MCGGG Posted February 28, 2015 Posted February 28, 2015 I thought his dismissal was the most disappointing today, was as soft as it gets and it triggered the collapse, surely he's played his last game, can't have Bailey not getting a game with this parrot in the side and we have enough ARs to cover for his bowling.
adi B Posted February 28, 2015 Posted February 28, 2015 He is useless,better play Faulkner or Hazelwood instead of him
G_B_ Posted February 28, 2015 Posted February 28, 2015 He is useless' date='better play Faulkner or Hazelwood instead of him[/quote'] Yup... His time is up..
MCGGG Posted February 28, 2015 Author Posted February 28, 2015 I'd rework the batting order, I'd open with Haddin and Finch with Warner at 3.
velu Posted February 28, 2015 Posted February 28, 2015 you are like australia KT :rofl: Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
gaurav92 Posted February 28, 2015 Posted February 28, 2015 Warner Finch Smith Clarke Haddin Maxwell Marsh Faulkner Johnson Starc Cummins Their best XI
Clarke Posted February 28, 2015 Posted February 28, 2015 He needs to be moved down the order, one of the most powerful strikers out there and should be filling in Faulkner's slot at 7/8 if he's unavailable. It is absolutely criminal to not have Smith face more overs considering his form.
Number Posted February 28, 2015 Posted February 28, 2015 He is Australia's Afridi. There just because he is a superstar.
Precambrian Posted February 28, 2015 Posted February 28, 2015 Forget Watson, it should be Clarke who should be shown the door first.
MCGGG Posted February 28, 2015 Author Posted February 28, 2015 If they don't drop him they have to send him down the order, 5 or 6, open with Finch and Haddin and Warner at 3, or keep the openers the same and promote Haddin to 3.
MCGGG Posted February 28, 2015 Author Posted February 28, 2015 He needs to be moved down the order, one of the most powerful strikers out there and should be filling in Faulkner's slot at 7/8 if he's unavailable. It is absolutely criminal to not have Smith face more overs considering his form. Agreed, no3 isn't working out for him.
govinda Posted February 28, 2015 Posted February 28, 2015 watto gives team many options i mean oppiiste team
HippoSucks Posted February 28, 2015 Posted February 28, 2015 No, he needs to be down the order at #5 or #6. Clarke and Smith should occupy the #3 and #4 positions.
afan Posted February 28, 2015 Posted February 28, 2015 I thought Clarke did pretty well while they were under the pump. Faulkner...why isnt he in the playing 11?
HippoSucks Posted February 28, 2015 Posted February 28, 2015 I thought Clarke did pretty well while they were under the pump. Faulkner...why isnt he in the playing 11? He is unfit but I think he will be back next match.
MCGGG Posted February 28, 2015 Author Posted February 28, 2015 I thought Clarke did pretty well while they were under the pump. Faulkner...why isnt he in the playing 11? Injured, could have played as a specialist bat but why risk it, today's game was for bragging rights only, didn't mean anything in the grand scheme, and TBH I think the way both teams played showed that.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now