adi B Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 Personally I think this wc has been a disappointing one though nothing beats 2007 in that aspect. The quality of matches were way too low,hardly a contest between the and the ball,too many one sided matches and the most importantly pathetic schedule!! I think this world cup has been the second worst after 2007
vvvslaxman Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 To make matters worse they had Manju as a commentator.
BeautifulGame Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 Yep.Most of the matches between big teams have been too oe sided.And the QF were too boring as well.Obviously nothing comes close to the farce that is 2007 Think the 1996 and 2011 were the best.Lot of quality matches and great crowds
BeautifulGame Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 The format sucks Dont agree.2011 with the same format was very good whereas the 99 with super 6 round mostly sucked.
gaurav92 Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 None of the QFs were interesting, may be thats why.
sage Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 After today's game you'd be stupid to say that. Wow, it was a blinder
maniac Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 After today's game you'd be stupid to say that. Wow' date=' it was a blinder[/quote'] So 1 game made up for all the crappy games so far ???
adi B Posted March 24, 2015 Author Posted March 24, 2015 To make matters worse they had Manju as a commentator. insult to injury :cantstop:
adi B Posted March 24, 2015 Author Posted March 24, 2015 Dont agree.2011 with the same format was very good whereas the 99 with super 6 round mostly sucked. i think the 99,03 wc were the best along with 2011
maniac Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 To make matters worse they had Manju as a commentator. Manjrekar is a bad commie but a good analyst
sage Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 So 1 game made up for all the crappy games so far ??? Ireland win Pakistan bowling vs Aussies Guptil 200 Australia vs New Zealand Bangladesh defeating England The list can go on, ... this is a great WC, perhaps not the best. But certainly not comparable to 2007 which was awful across all fronts
BeautifulGame Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 i think the 99' date='03 wc were the best along with 2011[/quote'] 96 was excellent particularly the knock out stage .Personally think the 2 SA-Aus matches cloud people's judgement about 99 world cup.Most of the other super 6 matches sucked rain messed up a lot and the final was a joke as well
gaurav92 Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 Worst WC - 1999 followed by 2007. This has been pretty decent to be honest. Loved it.
adi B Posted March 24, 2015 Author Posted March 24, 2015 96 was excellent particularly the knock out stage .Personally think the 2 SA-Aus matches cloud people's judgement about 99 world cup.Most of the other super 6 matches sucked rain messed up a lot and the final was a joke as well i go by the quality of teams as well.pak,nzl,aus,saf were really solid sides with india not too far behind.in 96 the KOs were certainly more enthralling though
maniac Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 i go by the quality of teams as well.pak' date='nzl,aus,saf were really solid sides with india not too far behind.in 96 the KOs were certainly more enthralling though[/quote'] Every World Cup had some memorable games that for ever will be remembered...hell even 2007 for the pak-ire and ind-ban match. This has been the most plain,uneventful and boring wc for sure. 2 batsmen went past 200 but still no one seemed to care.
Cricketics Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 To be honest, I have enjoyed this world cup. Some great commentry being done by Cricket greats like Shane Warne and there were some brilliant matches. Matches have been one sided in pretty much every tournament. Yes, q/f weer bit one sided but I enjoyed them none the less.
BeautifulGame Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 i go by the quality of teams as well.pak' date='nzl,aus,saf were really solid sides with india not too far behind.in 96 the KOs were certainly more enthralling though[/quote'] Pak Ind WI and Srl are all were much better in 96 .Also don't think there was much different for NZL just the English conditions made them more competitive .
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now