Rohit Sharma Appreciation Squad

[Lord]

:giggle: It is not about Rohit though. 1 week earlier Balaji/Dinda were the best bowlers, now someone comes up and says it was a no-brainer to play Balaji ahead of Chawla. :facepalm:

as they say hindsight is 20-20:--D but for Rohit,its correct,too many chances hv been given to him,the returns on investment arent there

[Crookbond]

as they say hindsight is 20-20:--D but for Rohit,its correct,too many chances hv been given to him,the returns on investment arent there

I would not mind dropping Rohit but the way arguments are put for other players seem like posters out here should be in the Indian team management.

[Lord]

I would not mind dropping Rohit but the way arguments are put for other players seem like posters out here should be in the Indian team management.

thats all we can do,put argumnents.

[The Outsider]

:giggle: It is not about Rohit though. 1 week earlier Balaji/Dinda were the best bowlers, now someone comes up and says it was a no-brainer to play Balaji ahead of Chawla. :facepalm:

What's with these generalizations - they make no sense. X, Y, Z say that Player 1 should be dropped while A, B, C say Player 1 should play. If Player 1 scores then you get back to A, B, C saying that "everyone" was asking for him to be dropped and if Player 1 fails you get back to X, Y, Z saying that "everyone" was asking him to play. You seem to have cracked the winning strategy! Argue with specific posters' viewpoints rather than making sweeping generalizations.

[Crookbond]

^ Anything else sir - am I a "lunatic" or am I "intellectually dishonest" now? :giggle:

[The Outsider]

^ Anything else sir - am I a "lunatic" or am I "intellectually dishonest" now? :giggle:

I don't know the word for it, but what you are doing is putting X's words in A's mouth and arguing against them to prove some non existent point. Makes zero sense. Your point would carry weight only if the same person who claimed Balaji to be the trash comes up and says that it was a no brainer to play Balaji ahead of Chawla. Otherwise you are just doing hawai phire.

[Crookbond]

I don't know the word for it' date=' but what you are doing is putting X's words in A's mouth and arguing against them to prove some non existent point. Makes zero sense. Your point would carry weight only if the same person who claimed Balaji to be the trash comes up and says that it was a no brainer to play Balaji ahead of Chawla. Otherwise you are just doing hawai phire.[/quote'] Good - I'm spared the abuse.

[The Dark Horse]

Yes, we should "try" other players because international cricket is the place where you "try" players right?.

Still better than giving more and more chances to a tried and tested failure

We do not have any other form of cricket but international cricket. I propose we give each Ranji player one Test match from the upcoming England/Australia series. You never know how they will perform

What's the point of having other 'forms' when people don't get selected in spite of the perfomances there.

[panther]

rohit 50 tonight.

[Old guy]

will be todays man of match :proud:

[velu]

will be todays man of match :proud:

considering your track record , i agree :agree:

[Old guy]

considering your track record ' date=' i agree :agree:[/quote'] it only works when every one disagrees :cantstop: so no agreeing

[rkt.india]

He scored 30 ball 50 in the one good match we won till now and people are still hell bent.

[Old guy]

He scored 30 ball 50 in the one good match we won till now and people are still hell bent.

now hating him is in thing :giggle:

[Crookbond]

Still better than giving more and more chances to a tried and tested failure What's the point of having other 'forms' when people don't get selected in spite of the perfomances there.

Both are the same sooner you realize the better it is. So, now two wrongs make a right, eh?

[The Dark Horse]

Dude im not telling that a random.player should be given chances. All I tell is deserving players should be given chances like those who.perform in domestic and A tours.

[Number]

^ Before this tour Rayudu wasn't even for A tours. Even Challengers. So from where he would've got a chance, directly into India colors. Now one good tour he is having and you think he is the greatest thing since Murgi ka anda. Seriously stop being such a fickle.

[Crookbond]

Dude im not telling that a random.player should be given chances. All I tell is deserving players should be given chances like those who.perform in domestic and A tours.

I ask for that too but in the current team no X,Y players are that good. You pick X or you pick Y does not make a difference.

[Lord]

^ Before this tour Rayudu wasn't even for A tours. Even Challengers. So from where he would've got a chance, directly into India colors. Now one good tour he is having and you think he is the greatest thing since Murgi ka anda. Seriously stop being such a fickle.

in IPL he always did well

[rkt.india]

in IPL he always did well

But his SR has never been great. Rohit is guy who can score 30 ball 50 against an international attack and he has done that. I dont expect that from Rayudu.