Singh bling Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 Virat-Anushka breakup was due to Rs. 40 Crorehttp://jknewsservice.com/virat-anushka-breakup-was-due-to-rs-40-crore/If the above is true then this clearly shows that these type of actresses just use Cricketers or any other rich guy for money diehardpacer 1
bulbul Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 If the above is true then this clearly shows that these type of actresses just use Cricketers or any other rich guy for money If it's true it's Virat's mistake to put money blindly into such projects...also can't believe it's 120 crore budget movie...lol..
rkt.india Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 Bombay was gigantic disaster.Sent from my MX5 using Tapatalk
bulbul Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 Bombay was gigantic disaster.Sent from my MX5 using Tapatalk??
rkt.india Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 Bombay velvet was a gigantic disaster.Sent from my MX5 using TapatalkBudget was 90 crore.Sent from my MX5 using Tapatalk
rkt.india Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 ?? Bombay velvet, budget 90crore. Such type of films arent going to work in India, too dark. Sent from my MX5 using Tapatalk
Captain Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 If this is true, i must say it's Virat's fault. Even if Ansuhka had insisted him to invest, it's still not her fault that the movie ended up as a disaster bringing in huge losses for all parties involved.
Bigg Brother Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 40 crore is huge...His 3 IPL season's salary...lol
Malcolm Merlyn Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 What utter rubbish article.Bombay velvet was produced by Fox Studios and Phantom films(50% owned by reliance rest by bjg producers like Madhu Mantena Vikramaditya Motwane etc).Its ridiculous to think that Kohli invested 1/3 in the movie.Plus Anushka is a very highly successful actress herself and may be earning as much as virat if not more. Budget was 90 crore.Sent from my MX5 using TapatalkNopes.120cr.
Malcolm Merlyn Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 Budget was 90 crore.Sent from my MX5 using TapatalkNopes.120cr. Budget was 90 crore.Sent from my MX5 using TapatalkNopes.120cr.
BlueBee Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 What a disastrous choice of movie to invest his money in. [emoji23]
vayuu1 Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 Should have named it anushka blew it . diehardpacer 1
bulbul Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 40 crore is huge...His 3 IPL season's salary...lolI guess he earns more than that in a year based on Advertisements...
Bigg Brother Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 I guess he earns more than that in a year based on Advertisements...Still thats huge...
Trichromatic Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 No credible source. I guess this thread should be closed.
rkt.india Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 Budget was 90, 120 is a wrong info.Sent from my MX5 using Tapatalk
bulbul Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 Budget was 90, 120 is a wrong info.Sent from my MX5 using TapatalkMay be it's including publicity...still it's too much.
rkt.india Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 May be it's including publicity...still it's too much.90 is including publicity. 80 odd plus 5-10 for publicity.Sent from my MX5 using Tapatalk
PBN Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 (edited) can't believe budget is 120cr for hindi movie. 'article' is just gossip sensation Edited March 13, 2016 by PBN
jusarrived Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 If the above is true then this clearly shows that these type of actresses just use Cricketers or any other rich guy for money you talk as though some of these actresses dont have enough of their own money . wasnt Virat using her anyway , if not for money something else ?
Recommended Posts