Iconoclast Posted June 19, 2017 Posted June 19, 2017 Just like in 92 it was the holy month and phixing is a big sin during this time This is the Pak team playing to its potential.
veer Posted June 19, 2017 Posted June 19, 2017 2 minutes ago, Iconoclast said: Just like in 92 it was the holy month and phixing is a big sin during this time This is the Pak team playing to its potential. Lol.. you are saying they fix matches in rest of 11 months..
DGBOSS Posted June 19, 2017 Posted June 19, 2017 12 minutes ago, Shaz1 said: I think it was the over confindence that killed India. There is no overconfidence . This is a very profesional team. This batting line up is most capable ofchasing 338. Pak Bowlers bowled well and the Ind batsmen played into their hands. Its simple . End of story
mancalledsting Posted June 19, 2017 Posted June 19, 2017 1. Indian over confidence 2. Pakistans fierce intensity 3. India's inability to match intensity at any stage of game- why? rohit, ashwin- return from injury kohli, jadeja- burnout (long test series, IPL) dhoni, yuvi- age 4. Poor tactics- pandya bowls an opening bowlers length-but kept for middle overs bumrah bowls death overs length- opened the bowling 5. Poor team and squad selection- msd, yuvi and ashwin- no wrist spinner to be fair we over achieved by reaching the final- but once faced with Pakistan in the final, should have won
Iconoclast Posted June 19, 2017 Posted June 19, 2017 1 hour ago, veer said: Lol.. you are saying they fix matches in rest of 11 months.. Honestly I have a suspicion they might have under-performed the first match to get better odds for the rest of tournament. IIRC they were 30:1 to win afterwards and became more profitable to win.
youngindia Posted June 19, 2017 Posted June 19, 2017 Basically our strengths in bowling(not topnotch anyway) was nullified by the conditions. we depend on swing and spin. pakistan and sl can punish our spinners easily in these totally unhelpful conditions. 2 spinners rendered null and void. 2 pacers only known for death bowling(not wickets). A young bowling allrounder who has limitations at the moment in range of skills. where r the wickets goin to come from? despite the fact pakistan is not the grestest of batting lineups.we didnt have one hostile top notch bowler More hostile 6 ft 3 and above bowlers are needed. Also the batting has been top heavy with yuvraj's decline and raina's failure to be better. There has been some unsettled middle order with oldies with shaky techniques on their last legs and jadhav a rubbish fielder and unproven. They didnt respond well to the fall of wickets There has to be some firepower to the 4-6 positions and thats where rahul and pandey are important in the near future.
veer Posted June 19, 2017 Posted June 19, 2017 9 minutes ago, Iconoclast said: Honestly I have a suspicion they might have under-performed the first match to get better odds for the rest of tournament. IIRC they were 30:1 to win afterwards and became more profitable to win. wait.. didnt first game fall in ramzaan too? you sound like Aamir Sohail junior..
vvvslaxman Posted June 19, 2017 Posted June 19, 2017 I would add one more thing. After seeing Rohit's struggle against Aamir in the first match (25 dots with plays and misses i would have had Dhawan facing Aamir first up. It might sound like you don't back your batsman up. But you are reducing the probability of losing a wicket in the first over. Laaloo 1
DGBOSS Posted June 19, 2017 Posted June 19, 2017 8 minutes ago, Shaz1 said: So do you really think India played best to its ability? Looks like you did notread the post. I said Indian batsmen played in the plans of the Pak Bowlers. If they played to their abilities that wont happen isnt it ?
vvvslaxman Posted June 19, 2017 Posted June 19, 2017 1 minute ago, Shaz1 said: Didn't Dhawan get out to Amir? That was more of his own mistake than laziness. He would not have played such a silly shot upfront. Rohit was fidgety, nervous upfront to see off that over. Dhawan is never nervous.
vvvslaxman Posted June 19, 2017 Posted June 19, 2017 If Kohli had come in after say 10 overs whole thing would have been different. New ball vs Kohli is always risky based on his style. India lacked a left arm seamer to practice against. I would rather have taken Unadkat instead of Ashwin.As soon as the squad was announced most fans were pissed off for not selecting youngsters. Somehow top 3 coming to form masked that short coming. Also there was no out of the box thinking like changing the batting order on the fly. Kohli is a batting legend. But he just is tactical like Gambhir. Gambhir was the first to get the leg slip position for Ashwin against NZ matches frequently during the 5-0 whitewash against NZ. Also with KKR he would always use his bowlers based on batsmen, pitch condition. You cannot follow the fixed plans. ThePhenomenal1 1
DGBOSS Posted June 19, 2017 Posted June 19, 2017 3 minutes ago, Shaz1 said: The Rohit wicket was due to his own weakness. Even Shoiab Akthar said to hit him on the pads. Interestingly enough Pakistan tried to get him out by bowling on the off side in the first game. It seems since that tactic never worked they got him out by hitting on his pads. Well we had Junaid Khan on the other end. Who had a good tournament as well. So lets say if Rohit survived Amir, would he be safe against Junaid? If u see properly Amir set rohit up. 2 balls left him and third came in. Brilliant tactic. Another day Rohit might win the duel.
Khota Posted June 19, 2017 Posted June 19, 2017 Rohit was a weak link all along. He should not have been selected. He did exceed expectations though.
Iconoclast Posted June 20, 2017 Posted June 20, 2017 1 hour ago, veer said: wait.. didnt first game fall in ramzaan too? you sound like Aamir Sohail junior.. That was a joke obviously
vvvslaxman Posted June 20, 2017 Posted June 20, 2017 48 minutes ago, Shaz1 said: The Rohit wicket was due to his own weakness. Even Shoiab Akthar said to hit him on the pads. Interestingly enough Pakistan tried to get him out by bowling on the off side in the first game. It seems since that tactic never worked they got him out by hitting on his pads. Well we had Junaid Khan on the other end. Who had a good tournament as well. So lets say if Rohit survived Amir, would he be safe against Junaid? 4 Yes Junaid was never a threat. His wicket meant Kohli against new ball. It was a tactic that they should have employed.
Vilander Posted June 20, 2017 Posted June 20, 2017 1, Pak played well 2, India selected poorly 3, did not execute plan b,c when got it. 4, pak had some luck. **** happens. Expect India to trounce opposition mercilessly in the next few series. I expect Handya to become epic and Krandya in the team, Shami back to being best.
Late Cut Posted June 20, 2017 Posted June 20, 2017 5 hours ago, PBN said: Ashwin used to be a real wicket taker.. off late he has been lacking that killer instinct once he gets hit for a few runs. A Not in ODIs
Khota Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 Selection. Kohli. Infighting with Kumble. There is nothing wrong with Indian cricket but plenty wrong with this team.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now