putrevus Posted August 7, 2017 Posted August 7, 2017 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Trichromatic said: Agree with later part about Chris Broad. In fact you can look at the decision and guess who might be the referee. Srinath is kind of soft in his cases and goes for lower limits of punishments when he hearing any case. Same is case with Madugalle. Broad is biased and that's not a secret. It is not being soft, it is called white man phobia. This white man phobia is a disease which still haunts lot of Asian players and journalists/media guys alike. Edited August 7, 2017 by putrevus
Trichromatic Posted August 7, 2017 Posted August 7, 2017 Just now, putrevus said: It is not being soft, it is called white man phobia. This white man phobia is a disease which still haunts lot of Asian players and journalist alike. Doubt that it's white man phobia. Srinath judges his cases more or less in same way most of the time. Can't post anything to support my claim, but it has been the impression built in long time.
express bowling Posted August 7, 2017 Posted August 7, 2017 21 minutes ago, Trichromatic said: Beamers are just called no-ball with 1 warning no matter bowler throws it intentionally and a player is punished for throwing ball towards batsman in dangerous manner. Although it can be argued that both are similar offences, but punishments differ because it has already been mentioned what should be done in each case. Can we draw an analogy there? Document says that umpires can decline reviews in such cases. So there is no case of other punishment here, unless it is specifically mentioned? Not a correct analogy as beamers are unintentional more often than not.... and taking dressing room help has to be intentional.
putrevus Posted August 7, 2017 Posted August 7, 2017 (edited) 3 hours ago, Trichromatic said: Doubt that it's white man phobia. Srinath judges his cases more or less in same way most of the time. Can't post anything to support my claim, but it has been the impression built in long time. It is not like Srinath/Madugalle are doing it on purpose. It has been ingrained in their systems.I can't post anything to support my claim either.But these are my observations. Making a spinning pitch is called doctoring the pitch but making a green top to suit home team strength is termed excellent.These are myths which have been propagated by white nations. Mind you the same people resorted to making spinning pitches and came up with rule changes to stop the might of WI in 1980s. If they play T20s it is good for the game but if Indians play IPL it is killing the game. One more example two odis where more than 800 plus runs are scored one is termed greatest Odi of all time while second one is dubbed killing the game by same journalists. All these things lead to incidents like Stuart Broad getting away with stepping on ball. Why do you think two reviews per 80 overs was introduced.All I am saying is this ICC is so biased in administering the game that it has no credibility left.Guys like Malcolm speed have left their imprints which are still hard to overcome. Edited August 7, 2017 by putrevus express bowling, chewy and Stuge 3
putrevus Posted August 7, 2017 Posted August 7, 2017 Just now, Stumped said: You missed the regulation below that though : 2.1.3 Public criticism of, or inappropriate comment in relation to an incident occurring in an International Match or any Player, Player Support Personnel, Match official or team participating in any International Match, irrespective of when such criticism or inappropriate comment is made. Which Kohli was in violation of when suggesting repeated systematic cheating in the post match press conference with no evidence. I thought it looked pretty clear that both boards agreed not to pursue punishments against each other as each captain recieving punishments during the series wouldn't benefit anyone. If Smith was punished as soon as it happened , Kohli's reaction would have been different .Kohli never said the word "cheating" himself so I don't think he did anything wrong. The problem is instigator never gets punished Rabada was instigated by Stokes who is no saint but he escaped but Rabada got punished.If ICC bans sledging all together it will be Aussies then Pommies who will protest against it first.
Stuge Posted August 7, 2017 Author Posted August 7, 2017 Without a doubt its known to all how biased is ICC .As mentioned above Smith was let off itself showed the same . express bowling and Under_Score 2
Hyderabadi Tiger Posted August 8, 2017 Posted August 8, 2017 On 8/7/2017 at 6:30 AM, Mosher said: Got this video from Reddit. Root didn't get any demerit points for this. * ICC. https://streamable.com/j5kv5 that wasn't coming fast and he immediately apologized. Stop playing the victim card. We will never move forward if we keep whining about such incidents
rtmohanlal Posted August 9, 2017 Posted August 9, 2017 Yes, in general non whites , asians in particular get rough treatments when compared to whites is a well known factor. But what the hell , the so called influential BCCI is doing to stop such discriminations against Indian players???
Mosher Posted August 9, 2017 Posted August 9, 2017 2 hours ago, Hyderabadi Tiger said: that wasn't coming fast and he immediately apologized. Stop playing the victim card. We will never move forward if we keep whining about such incidents Not coming too fast??? That would have hurt Rahul too if it had hit him. The problem is with the ICC not enforcing the rules equally for all and this is not the first time the ICC has done something like this. Jadeja too puts up his hands to apologize. Watch the video here. http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/20283483/icc-earning-demerit-points-inconsistent-system express bowling 1
Hyderabadi Tiger Posted August 9, 2017 Posted August 9, 2017 13 hours ago, Mosher said: Not coming too fast??? That would have hurt Rahul too if it had hit him. The problem is with the ICC not enforcing the rules equally for all and this is not the first time the ICC has done something like this. Jadeja too puts up his hands to apologize. Watch the video here. http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/20283483/icc-earning-demerit-points-inconsistent-system if that would have hurt Rahul then he's not fit to play in the men's team, I'm sorry but nothing seemed dangerous at all
PBN Posted August 9, 2017 Posted August 9, 2017 Regarding Root's throw, was the demerit system in pace during that test? Also, found this funny demerit point for Harmanpreet Kaur on ICC's site " After an attempted run out Harmanpreet abused her equipment by throwing her bat to the ground." https://www.icc-cricket.com/about/cricket/rules-and-regulations/code-of-conduct
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now