Khota Posted August 4, 2018 Posted August 4, 2018 Want to take every advantage they can get. Why not SG? nevada and UrmiSinhaRay 1 1
kosingh Posted August 4, 2018 Posted August 4, 2018 An interesting article from a few years ago about different cricket balls. Duke will not last 80 overs on typical Indian wickets. http://www.espncricinfo.com/blogs/content/story/607403.html UrmiSinhaRay 1
Turning_track Posted August 4, 2018 Posted August 4, 2018 Won't last in the subcontinent, also SG is much better for the spinners with its grip. Athers & Nass should have given the idea to Aussies after losing 4-0 against them, as they use machine made Kookaburra balls. UrmiSinhaRay 1
Nikhil_cric Posted August 5, 2018 Posted August 5, 2018 3 hours ago, kosingh said: An interesting article from a few years ago about different cricket balls. Duke will not last 80 overs on typical Indian wickets. http://www.espncricinfo.com/blogs/content/story/607403.html Not necessarily . A version of the Dukes is used in the West Indies and half of the Shield season in Australian domestic. And both those actually last longer than the kookaburra.
rkt.india Posted August 5, 2018 Posted August 5, 2018 4 hours ago, Turning_track said: Won't last in the subcontinent, also SG is much better for the spinners with its grip. Athers & Nass should have given the idea to Aussies after losing 4-0 against them, as they use machine made Kookaburra balls. Even SG doesn't last 80 overs in India.
Lannister Posted August 5, 2018 Posted August 5, 2018 The wicket was great. There was a balance between bat and ball with bowlers having a bit more help. Other boards should learn from this. A maximum score of 300 - 350 is what makes Test more watchable and captivating.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now