saik Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 Shami is a good bowler in SC conditions, average in SENA . Link to comment
express bowling Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 Unless there is a crisis or a horses for courses policy based change ... changes should be made only if there is a clearly better short term and long term option available. That option is Siraj. If Siraj is chosen then he can replace Shami ... if not then Shami should play. No point bringing in a Shardul or an Umesh ... and then want them out after one match if they fail. Teams are not built that way. MCcricket and sandeep 1 1 Link to comment
The Dark Horse Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 1 hour ago, Trichromatic said: 3 matches 8 wickets Avg of 40 Told you he must be 36... Link to comment
Trichromatic Posted August 21, 2018 Author Share Posted August 21, 2018 3 minutes ago, The Dark Horse said: Told you he must be 36... Avg speed of 140. Link to comment
Samcric Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 Even when he is in rhythm, he just can't bowl 6 good bowls in the channel in an over. Hence, the high economy rate. If the way Siraj has performed can't get him in the team, I don't think that will be encouraging for those vying for a spot in the Indian team. Let the likes of Umesh, Shardul, Shami go and prove themselves in India A games or Ranji. I really doubt if they can outperform the likes of Siraj, Rajpoot or Gurbani. We must induct good pacers performing well especially if they are in the 22-26 age group and have a good mix of youth and experience. Link to comment
Suhaan Posted August 22, 2018 Share Posted August 22, 2018 The current team management doesn't have the guts to play Siraj in place of Shami,if somehow he gets selected in the squad,they will select the worst variant called" Umesh"..Siraj cant bowl bad....this is test cricket and infact he did extremely well with the A side there,I dont mind even if Rajpoot is given a chance express bowling 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted August 22, 2018 Share Posted August 22, 2018 Problem with Shami is he does not swing the ball much and he is too short to be a hit the deck bowler. Link to comment
Moochad Posted August 22, 2018 Share Posted August 22, 2018 India bowling averages Player Mat Inns Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI BBM Ave Econ SR 5 10 Ct St JJ Bumrah 1 2 41.2 10 122 7 5/85 7/122 17.42 2.95 35.4 1 0 0 0 HH Pandya 3 4 47.1 7 162 9 5/28 6/50 18.00 3.43 31.4 1 0 0 0 UT Yadav 1 2 24.0 3 76 3 2/20 3/76 25.33 3.16 48.0 0 0 0 0 I Sharma 3 5 81.0 11 300 11 5/51 6/97 27.27 3.70 44.1 1 0 0 0 R Ashwin 3 5 87.5 20 236 8 4/62 7/121 29.50 2.68 65.8 0 0 1 0 Mohammed Shami 3 5 83.4 13 332 8 3/64 3/96 41.50 3.96 62.7 0 0 1 0 Kuldeep Yadav 1 1 9.0 1 44 0 - - - 4.88 - 0 0 0 0 S Dhawan 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 0 KD Karthik 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 0 V Kohli 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 0 RR Pant 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 0 CA Pujara 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 AM Rahane 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 0 KL Rahul 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 0 M Vijay 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 Never mind what I said earlier. Shami has a poor SR. Ashwin overall surpasses Shami's performance so far on tour. Bumrah, Pandya, and Ishant each with a 5-for so far Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now