How is Dhawan not part of team, but Rohit is?

[velu]

15 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Dhawan failed in Last series, rohit wasnt their to fail

 

you meant "not there" 

[velu]

"come to Australia" - rohit to starc & co

[Dil Dil India]

5 hours ago, Number said:

I cant recall the time Rohit was given a run of 7 8 games and he failed in each innings of them.

Hahahahahaha! I can't believe Sharma ji still has sycophants.

 

Sharma ji has been an UTTER FAILURE in test cricket aside from WI and SL bashing at home. In SENA, the useless hack averages less than Ashwin and Bhuvi. No wonder Bewda and lolhi keep picking no-talent Sharma given how delusional some of our fans are.

[Dil Dil India]

1 hour ago, nevada said:

Rohit is in because he is not playing as an opener. He plays at 6, and in theory he has the capability to do well on the bouncy pitches of Australia. Team management threw Vihari in as a sacrificial lamb instead of taking a gamble with Rohit as opener because they have no confidence in him in that role.  Dhawan has had his share of failures abroad and unlike Rohit, he cannot hide in the middle order either, so he has been dropped.

Dhawan is bad in SENA in tests, but nowhere close to as bad as Rohit. He has a test century in NZ. No-talent would need 10 tests there to score a cumulative 100.

[raki05]

17 hours ago, Trichromatic said:

For all his shortcomings, Dhawan is more successful than Rohit in tests. 

They both shouldn't be in test team. Shaw should be other opener once he is fit.

[Adi BB]

What's this obsession  of going merry go round with these same players who have almost zilch scope of improving in test cricket and especially when you have got many talented players waiting in the ranks!

Why cant icfers differentiate between formats ?

It's always better to go with young guns because they are hungry for success than crying over why sh1t played over sh1ttier!

[MCcricket]

17 hours ago, Trichromatic said:

Since we have queue system, surely Dhawan should be ahead of Rohit in that queue.

The question applies for losers n people who don't hire Bunty. The team management n selectors have failed in many ways n tend to use recycle trash and are eco friendly. 

Dhawan , Rohit, Rahne, have proved 100 of times they can be successful in only certain formats and against good judgement and common sense they are given countless chance for the sake of so called experience but India ain't NZ and we have a huge pool of players.

 

Same with bowlers why do we keep playing some bowlers and over reliant on Bumrah why can't we try find one more Bumrah. Umesh has been mediocre, BK is limited and Ishant is ok at present, how long will we keep playing ASHWIN away from Sub con where he is mediocre.

[nevada]

53 minutes ago, Dil Dil India said:

Dhawan is bad in SENA in tests, but nowhere close to as bad as Rohit. He has a test century in NZ. No-talent would need 10 tests there to score a cumulative 100.

I agree with both your points. But I was only pointing out selectors'/team management's logic in picking Rohit at this time. THey had used similar flawed thinking with Dhawan before and he has wasted away his chances. It will take a while for Dhawan to find favor again but it can happen if things fall in place for him. Bottom-line is neither is a good test player in SENA with Rohit decidedly the worst among the two but time to time they get in the door due to their dazzling feats in ODIs. 

[Number]

10 hours ago, Dil Dil India said:

Hahahahahaha! I can't believe Sharma ji still has sycophants.

 

Sharma ji has been an UTTER FAILURE in test cricket aside from WI and SL bashing at home. In SENA, the useless hack averages less than Ashwin and Bhuvi. No wonder Bewda and lolhi keep picking no-talent Sharma given how delusional some of our fans are.

lol I have no faith in Rohit.

Just that Dhawan has been given continuous run the same has not happened with Rohit. Thats why "experts" start asking for his inclusion whenever our batting fails without him.

[Ankit_sharma03]

2 hours ago, Number said:

lol I have no faith in Rohit.

Just that Dhawan has been given continuous run the same has not happened with Rohit. Thats why "experts" start asking for his inclusion whenever our batting fails without him.

u get that if u do something and he doesnt do anything to demand it

[JourneyMan]

If you remove the first digit of Rohits score today, then I agree that Dhawan could have made the same amount of runs.