Jump to content

Khota 1 -0 ICF, Resistance Is Futile, Allrounders Do Not Exist


Khota

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 minutes ago, R!TTER said:

Does eating, talking BS & posting all at the same time count :eyedance:

At ICF level yes. At highest level no.

Posted
16 minutes ago, zen said:

WKs should not bat as their body is taxed twice as much :((

Not necessarily true. 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Khota said:

Not necessarily true. 

 

Human body cannot to do multiple tasks efficiently in sports :((

Edited by zen
Posted

Khota you need to articulate it better.

 

A player needs to be picked on one skill and if he has an additional skill it is a bonus. If 2 batsmen are tied for a spot then maybe the guy with the extra skill can be considered. That could be anything. A bowler who can bat a bit or vice versa, good fielder etc.

 

Picking a player because he has 3d skills or he can do a little bit of this and that while not having one prime skill is a concern. I am on board on that one.

 

Thakur was picked as a 4th bowler in tests who could bat a bit and he did his job well. He flopped in T20 and has not added to the balance as his bowling in T20 has been lackluster.

 

There is a difference here 

Posted
1 minute ago, asterix said:

Bhuvi can be a cheap version of AllRounder…

:behindsofa:

Poor man's version on a sunny day when batting and cloudy when bowling.

Posted
13 minutes ago, zen said:

 

Human body cannot to do multiple tasks efficiently in sports :((

People running 100m have a different body than those running marathon.

100 m strong muscular body.

Marathon lean body with long legs short torso.

Swimming long torso short legs.

Plenty of examples out there.

Posted
Just now, Khota said:

People running 100m have a different body than those running marathon.

100 m strong muscular body.

Marathon lean body with long legs short torso.

Swimming long torso short legs.

Plenty of examples out there.


A body expert on ICF says that cricketers cannot do two things - WKs should not bat :((

Posted
1 minute ago, Khota said:

Do it consistently and then come back. Fluke.

Yes, in order to do it consistently he needs time and opportunities. 

You posted above that he is finished as an all-rounder. So atleast wait before judging if he failed or succeeded. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, maniac said:

Khota you need to articulate it better.

 

A player needs to be picked on one skill and if he has an additional skill it is a bonus. If 2 batsmen are tied for a spot then maybe the guy with the extra skill can be considered. That could be anything. A bowler who can bat a bit or vice versa, good fielder etc.

 

Picking a player because he has 3d skills or he can do a little bit of this and that while not having one prime skill is a concern. I am on board on that one.

 

Thakur was picked as a 4th bowler in tests who could bat a bit and he did his job well. He flopped in T20 and has not added to the balance as his bowling in T20 has been lackluster.

 

There is a difference here 

Articulation is not my forte.

Tame baseball. All pitchers have long wingspan to generate arm velocity. Bats have hand eye coordination with tremendous eyesight and fast running. You cannot multitask. Impossible

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, zen said:


A body expert on ICF says that cricketers cannot do two things - WKs should not bat :((

You are being funny. Wicket keepers can bat some because xss e of hand eye coordination. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Adamant said:

Yes, in order to do it consistently he needs time and opportunities. 

You posted above that he is finished as an all-rounder. So atleast wait before judging if he failed or succeeded. 

I know how it ends. Not well.

Posted
Just now, Khota said:

You are being funny. Wicket keepers can bat some because xss e of hand eye coordination. 


Nah. No two things can be done as that expert has convinced everyone on ICF 

Posted
Just now, Khota said:

These are similar tasks Einstein. 


Nah. Cricket needs 11 specialist batsmen when batting and 1 WK + 10 bowlers when bowling … Need to rewrite for the playing 11, I mean 22 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Khota said:

He fluked his way in one format.

Fluked his was in 2-3 crucial away tests, when the odds were really stacked against us? Do you need this new stuff called LSD? Yes, when we expect more from him & teams plan him out that's when his real test will be. But let's not make light of his bowling or batting achievements just yet, FYI he's better in the longer formats than T20's at least IMO.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...