Jump to content

Australia tour of Pakistan - 3 tests, 3 ODIs and 1 t20i


Recommended Posts

Posted
41 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

agar players ko itni jaldi dismiss karoge to kya hi hoga , he is a terrific prospect . Who doesnt have bad days 

The guy is avg 16 in t20 as bowler 

Is baar maar padi hai Isko psl mai... Once novelty factor wears off it is tough.   Let's see how he bats though.  Faheem Ashraf is still the only quality pace bowling A/R in Pakistan. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Frustrated said:

First 15 overs 112 runs.   Next 25 overs 123 runs:laugh:

Inexperienced hai middle order...  Understandable.  They are missing Wade Marsh Smith caliber players. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Lone Wolf said:

Is baar maar padi hai Isko psl mai... Once novelty factor wears off it is tough.   Let's see how he bats though.  Faheem Ashraf is still the only quality pace bowling A/R in Pakistan. 

t20 men sabko padti hai 

Faheem is batting A/r who has been groomed at international level for yrs

Mohd Wasim is a bowling who still is a rookie 

 

What novelity factor ?? He isnt a mystery spinner ....He wont be the team best bowler or batsman but someone who ll win games with both time n again but dnt expect him to be a shaheeen or babar. As far his batting, he does have the batting ability of razzaq but thats just ability. To transform that he needs to bat up n build a batsman game 

Never understood how players in such short careers are dismissed . Even today ur pointing when his eco is 5.66 which is ok n none of the seamer has taken a wkt till now 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Inexperienced hai middle order...  Understandable.  They are missing Wade Marsh Smith caliber players. 

Haan.  Lekin stoinis 26 off 42. (with so much experience)

Posted
42 minutes ago, Jay said:

next great tailunt kaun abhi? rauf phasssssssssssssssst

wasim swing king

zahid new sqalain?

Rauf bowled well..  Breached 150k.   Improved at death I think. 

Posted

There we go.. 

 

Barbie gets a cute little 50 at a strike rate of 75 , gets the required run rate to 7.5 and gets out softly when it was time to step it up. story of his entire career and his fake no. 1 ODI ranking. 

 

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Norman said:

There we go.. 

 

Barbie gets a cute little 50 at a strike rate of 75 , gets the required run rate to 7.5 and gets out softly when it was time to step it up. story of his entire career and his fake no. 1 ODI ranking. 

 

 

Very similar to Loli 2.0. 

Posted
30 minutes ago, Norman said:

There we go.. 

 

Barbie gets a cute little 50 at a strike rate of 75 , gets the required run rate to 7.5 and gets out softly when it was time to step it up. story of his entire career and his fake no. 1 ODI ranking. 

 

 

"best all format batsman in Asia".

 

At getting soft scores.

Posted
6 minutes ago, sandeep said:

"best all format batsman in Asia".

 

At getting soft scores.

Is he even better than Rahul in any format? I don't even rate Rahul all that high. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Jay said:

Is he even better than Rahul in any format? I don't even rate Rahul all that high. 

I don't think he is, but Rahul has had some bad slumps that knock his career numbers down.  Never mind the fact that Rahul has scored clutch runs opening in test cricket, home and away, while Babar is coddled in the middle order...

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, sandeep said:

I don't think he is, but Rahul has had some bad slumps that knock his career numbers down.  Never mind the fact that Rahul has scored clutch runs opening in test cricket, home and away, while Babar is coddled in the middle order...

I really do believe in Rahul the middle order player. I should have made that clear. I think he Is good at 4 /5 in tests and odi. Even t20. He should never open. Unless it's a turner. He just doesn't have the quality to open vs swing. He suckd as an opner. I am sure babar would be a bad opener too. Rahul is solid in the middle. I truly believe a better player than babar in middle order. 

Edited by Jay
Posted
9 minutes ago, Jay said:

I really do believe in Rahul the middle order player. I should have made that clear. I think he Is good at 4 /5 in tests and odi. Even t20. He should never open. Unless it's a turner. He just doesn't have the quality to open vs swing. He suckd as an opner. I am sure babar would be a bad opener too. Rahul is solid in the middle. I truly believe a better player than babar in middle order. 

I disagree - I believe in Rahul as an overall complete batsman.  He played really well for India as an opener early on.  He modified his technique and batting style to become a more effective hitter in white ball, and that impacted his performance against the new red ball.  But overall I believe in his ability.

Posted
1 minute ago, sandeep said:

I disagree - I believe in Rahul as an overall complete batsman.  He played really well for India as an opener early on.  He modified his technique and batting style to become a more effective hitter in white ball, and that impacted his performance against the new red ball.  But overall I believe in his ability.

That's true. Same happened with mayank. Mayank was very good vs australia in 2018 with a different stance and technique. After IPL exploits and LOI ambition he changed his entire technique. 

 

Rahul should feature in the middle if he cant adjust his technique accordingly based on the format. I definitely think he is useless vs swing. Enough evidence to support that barring 2 games vs england in those conditions.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...