Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, zen said:

Replay shows that Marsh would have been out of a review was taken 

 

Boult likes DC

surprised no review.. hope RR is not going to pay for this

Posted
1 minute ago, vvvslaxman said:

Sanju bottled it big time. Ball is swinging a lot. Why did he take prasidh off.

It’s Boult’s fault. Don’t think it is going to be hard to bully Samson into a review.

Posted
Just now, sensible-indian said:

There was no need for ashwin.

 

Samson is a moron.

 

No understanding of the rhythm of the game.

 

Dakkan

 

Prasidh was swinging a ball miles. That should have given him the clue

Posted
1 minute ago, maniac said:

Do the sponsors really think Murali K shouting Khan Academy cracking six really helps their product ?

Bcci must do something about this ugly way of promotion.

 

Tata Nixon crap where commies fake enthusiasm.

 

If I hear about kaziranga national park another time...

Posted (edited)

For RR, actually not a bad score considering both Buttler & Samson did not click, along w/ Hetmyer unavailable 


Could have tried RVD at 3 but maybe wanted to give those likely to be the 11 more an opportunity to bat in the middle (as RVD would be replaced by Hetmyer). But in that case, could have moved Padikkal to 3 or promoted Parag :hmmm:

 

Edited by zen
Posted
1 minute ago, sensible-indian said:

Bcci must do something about this ugly way of promotion.

 

Tata Nixon crap where commies fake enthusiasm.

 

If I hear about kaziranga national park another time...

game can't survive without those.

×
×
  • Create New...