Love Jihad stories

[Gollum]

4 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Hindus have always been weak willed...  They need government,  police help to keep order.  It has never worked & will never. 

Community level work has to be there.   UC's have zero unity,  SC/ST have better unity & coordination but lack confidence. 

They never had something which Sikhs had...  They literally throw caution to the wind when it comes to their people. 

 

Someone should make a Pope or Caliph or some sort of higher authority to unify and mobilize the masses...  Make Tuesday Temple going compulsory just like Friday Jumma and Sunday mass and have some sort of coordination. 

Sikhs too are victims in Punjab, so many cases and not just from Malerkotla. Yet they don't have the guts to raise their voices, Islamists are their new masters.

 

Syrian Christians from Kerala, Ladakhi Buddhists, all are victims of this disgusting ideology.

 

In developed countries there are so many grooming gangs. Pakistanis, Bangladeshis in UK......North Africans in France, Syrians and Iraqis in Germany. It is a cluster*. Heck Nigerians and Kenyan non-Muslims are suffering and they look up to us Hindus and Chinese on how to deal with the Islamists. 

 

Don't sell Hindus short, at least we are fighting back, have vigilante groups, hit back in most states. Sure we may not be as efficient as the Chinese but bigger demographical and geographical challenge in India, also the curse of democracy and Islamist appeasing opposition parties. 

Edited April 27 by Gollum

[AuxiliA]

14 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Sikhs too are victims in Punjab, so many cases and not just from Malerkotla. Yet they don't have the guts to raise their voices, Islamists are their new masters.

 

Syrian Christians from Kerala, Ladakhi Buddhists, all are victims of this disgusting ideology.

 

In developed countries there are so many grooming gangs. Pakistanis, Bangladeshis in UK......North Africans in France, Syrians and Iraqis in Germany. It is a cluster*. Heck Nigerians and Kenyan non-Muslims are suffering and they look up to us Hindus and Chinese on how to deal with the Islamists. 

 

Don't sell Hindus short, at least we are fighting back, have vigilante groups, hit back in most states. Sure we may not be as efficient as the Chinese but bigger demographical and geographical challenge in India, also the curse of democracy and Islamist appeasing opposition parties. 

 

 

Only the Communists know how to properly deal with Islamists. And only the Islamists know how to properly deal with Communists. 

 

Funny how they both don't let the other survive in their territories but are hand in hand with each other in neutral territories.

 

 

[coffee_rules]

1 minute ago, AuxiliA said:

 

 

Only the Communists know how to properly deal with Islamists. And only the Islamists know how to properly deal with Communists. 

 

Funny how they both don't let the other survive in their territories but are hand in hand with each other in neutral territories.

 

 

Communists are in bed with Islamists. You must only China knows how to deal with Islamists. Islamists use commies as useful idiots, once they take over they eliminate them. As seen in Pak and BD. 

[Gollum]

8 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Communists are in bed with Islamists. You must only China knows how to deal with Islamists. Islamists use commies as useful idiots, once they take over they eliminate them. As seen in Pak and BD. 

USSR dealt with Islamists just fine, Central Asian countries are doing better now because of that legacy.

 

Even Indonesia in the 60s and 70s.

Communists and Islamists are allies in neutral places as @AuxiliA correctly pointed out. 

[coffee_rules]

2 minutes ago, Gollum said:

USSR dealt with Islamists just fine, Central Asian countries are doing better now because of that legacy.

 

Even Indonesia in the 60s and 70s.

Communists and Islamists are allies in neutral places as @AuxiliA correctly pointed out. 

Yes, but, there is a difference. it is about power. uSSR, China and Central Asian countries have dealt with Islamists using power, not being supportive of them.  Whereas in Islamic countries , commies have supported Islamists and have got eliminated. That’s the distinction I am making. Iran, Turkey, Pak , BD are evidence of that. Even Kashmir too, the terrorists eliminated all communist minded non-Islamists. 

[BacktoCricaddict]

6 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Hindus have always been weak willed... 

And yet, Hindus have survived waves and waves of invasions spanning millenia.

[AuxiliA]

Another one from Karnataka, just last week.

 

Married Hindu dalit woman raped by Jihadi man while his Jihadi wife video records it to blackmail her to convert.

 

Man, Islam is such a horny-men friendly religion that even your wife is cool with you raping other ladies in front of her if that leads to conversion! 

 

Also shoutout to Bheem-Meem unity.

 

 

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/karnataka/story/forced-religious-conversion-hindu-muslim-karnataka-belagavi-married-woman-rape-intimate-photos-2529912-2024-04-21?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=recirculation

[Gollum]

4 hours ago, AuxiliA said:

Another one from Karnataka, just last week.

 

Married Hindu dalit woman raped by Jihadi man while his Jihadi wife video records it to blackmail her to convert.

 

Man, Islam is such a horny-men friendly religion that even your wife is cool with you raping other ladies in front of her if that leads to conversion! 

 

Also shoutout to Bheem-Meem unity.

 

 

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/karnataka/story/forced-religious-conversion-hindu-muslim-karnataka-belagavi-married-woman-rape-intimate-photos-2529912-2024-04-21?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=recirculation

Sick, disgusting ideology. In many of these LJ cases, whole family including parents, wife, brothers involved. These are not random acts, lots of planning and strategy. Part of a larger conspiracy to wage terror on kafirs. Islamic terrorism comes in all shapes and sizes, whether this or land grab using waqf, one thing common is victim card when they are cornered.

[Lone Wolf]

7 hours ago, BacktoCricaddict said:

And yet, Hindus have survived waves and waves of invasions spanning millenia.

Nearly 60 crore of our people adopted Abrahamaic faiths...  As a result. 

Have to thank Brits and Sikhs to free North Indians of Afghan tyranny.  Marathas were nowhere to be seen post Panipat in the North...  Had these people succeed in 1857 Idk how much of country would be Mughal/Muslim ruled or what?.. 

 

Indian and Iranians the two pinnacle civilizations were perhaps most subjugated one throughout the history...  I fail to find another example. 

Thank god North Indians repelled Arab invasions in the 8th century or we would have a similar fate like Iranians. 

[AuxiliA]

35 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Nearly 60 crore of our people adopted Abrahamaic faiths...  As a result. 

Have to thank Brits and Sikhs to free North Indians of Afghan tyranny.  Marathas were nowhere to be seen post Panipat in the North...  Had these people succeed in 1857 Idk how much of country would be Mughal/Muslim ruled or what?.. 

 

Indian and Iranians the two pinnacle civilizations were perhaps most subjugated one throughout the history...  I fail to find another example. 

Thank god North Indians repelled Arab invasions in the 8th century or we would have a similar fate like Iranians. 

 

 

Hindus did pretty well to survive to survive the full onslaught of both the Islamists and Missionaries. Despite being totally unorganised.

 

The North Indian Kshatriya rulers successfully repelled Islamic invaders for 500 long years(700-1200). Many other great ancient civilizations like Iran, Syria,etc were converted to Islam within a few decades. 

 

If Hindus had some kind of central authority like the European Christians had they could have repelled the mediaeval Islamic invasions too. But sadly Hindu Kings of North and South had no coordination and fell one after the other like dominos. 

 

Sikhs are basically abrahamized versions of Hindus. They are part of the Dharmic family, just like the Jains and Buddhists. 

 

[coffee_rules]

8 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Nearly 60 crore of our people adopted Abrahamaic faiths...  As a result. 

Have to thank Brits and Sikhs to free North Indians of Afghan tyranny.  Marathas were nowhere to be seen post Panipat in the North...  Had these people succeed in 1857 Idk how much of country would be Mughal/Muslim ruled or what?.. 

 

Indian and Iranians the two pinnacle civilizations were perhaps most subjugated one throughout the history...  I fail to find another example. 

Thank god North Indians repelled Arab invasions in the 8th century or we would have a similar fate like Iranians. 

Iran was Islamized before even Afghans  in a wave of mere 30 years. After that, most invasions came from Turkic/Afghani rulers.  After M Qasim invasion, Bappa Rawal and his successors fought against Arab invasions until Ghori, it was in Morth India as that is how invasions happened through land and North Indians had to defend. After Ghori and establishment of Qutub Aibal and the Delhi Sultanate, large amounts of conversions did happen and destruction of temples by them and Moghuls , so much that the first big temple built in North India was Birla Mandir in 1937!!

 

It was not like Islamic rule was not restricted only to North India before Moghuls, Bahanis and other Islamic rulers reached Arcot in TN as well. Until resistance from Vijayanagara , there was rampant Islamic rule unchecked by “North” Indians. 
 

You have to check rule of Peshwas and Marathas after Abdali . They were not decimated as you think. Madhavarao Peshwa and his successor till Baji Rao had a good hold of North India .  Peshwas defeated British (first war) , Tipu and Nizams before  , and lost it only after Third Anglo Maratha war in 1818. They had checked widespread Islamization even before British did. Tipu had to stop his forced conversion and temple destruction after he had a treaty with Peshwas. They also helped Sikhs and was responding for Ranjit Singh to establish the first Sikh empire. 
 

You continue to short sell Hindu rulers for not defending Islamization, I don’t think they would lead to rampant takeover of India by Islam if they had succeeded in 1857.  It was a marriage of convenience between Awadh Maratha rulers and Moghuls , Sikhs didn’t join the war and were supportive of British. 

[Lone Wolf]

2 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Iran was Islamized before even Afghans  in a wave of mere 30 years. After that, most invasions came from Turkic/Afghani rulers.  After M Qasim invasion, Bappa Rawal and his successors fought against Arab invasions until Ghori, it was in Morth India as that is how invasions happened through land and North Indians had to defend. After Ghori and establishment of Qutub Aibal and the Delhi Sultanate, large amounts of conversions did happen and destruction of temples by them and Moghuls , so much that the first big temple built in North India was Birla Mandir in 1937!!

 

It was not like Islamic rule was not restricted only to North India before Moghuls, Bahanis and other Islamic rulers reached Arcot in TN as well. Until resistance from Vijayanagara , there was rampant Islamic rule unchecked by “North” Indians. 
 

You have to check rule of Peshwas and Marathas after Abdali . They were not decimated as you think. Madhavarao Peshwa and his successor till Baji Rao had a good hold of North India .  Peshwas defeated British (first war) , Tipu and Nizams before  , and lost it only after Third Anglo Maratha war in 1818. They had checked widespread Islamization even before British did. Tipu had to stop his forced conversion and temple destruction after he had a treaty with Peshwas. They also helped Sikhs and was responding for Ranjit Singh to establish the first Sikh empire. 
 

You continue to short sell Hindu rulers for not defending Islamization, I don’t think they would lead to rampant takeover of India by Islam if they had succeeded in 1857.  It was a marriage of convenience between Awadh Maratha rulers and Moghuls , Sikhs didn’t join the war and were supportive of British. 

I know... Turkic Islamic invasion were low key loot based ones...  Malik Kafur literally raided Madurai during Khilji rule.  Dude was a unparalleled General of his times. 

 

Arab invasions on the other hand were driven mostly in the name of Prophet and Caliph... Abbasid Caliphate had proclaimed to bring India under Islamic fold...  The OG Gazwa e Hind.. 

They were conversion oriented....  Sindh and Multan bore the brunt of mass Conversion. 

Then Rulers of KasHmir and Punjab ( Lalitaditya)  and Gurjars dynasty of Bappa Rawal and co stopped their invasions.   Biggest heroes of Indian history by a humongous margin. 

 

Nagbhatta of Deccan stopped them in Central India. 

 

After that there is Nothing to show I am afraid.  

Turks were simply unstoppable 300 years later & only faced reversals in Kashmir. 

[randomGuy]

51 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Iran was Islamized before even Afghans  in a wave of mere 30 years. After that, most invasions came from Turkic/Afghani rulers.  After M Qasim invasion, Bappa Rawal and his successors fought against Arab invasions until Ghori, it was in Morth India as that is how invasions happened through land and North Indians had to defend. After Ghori and establishment of Qutub Aibal and the Delhi Sultanate, large amounts of conversions did happen and destruction of temples by them and Moghuls , so much that the first big temple built in North India was Birla Mandir in 1937!!

 

It was not like Islamic rule was not restricted only to North India before Moghuls, Bahanis and other Islamic rulers reached Arcot in TN as well. Until resistance from Vijayanagara , there was rampant Islamic rule unchecked by “North” Indians. 
 

You have to check rule of Peshwas and Marathas after Abdali . They were not decimated as you think. Madhavarao Peshwa and his successor till Baji Rao had a good hold of North India .  Peshwas defeated British (first war) , Tipu and Nizams before  , and lost it only after Third Anglo Maratha war in 1818. They had checked widespread Islamization even before British did. Tipu had to stop his forced conversion and temple destruction after he had a treaty with Peshwas. They also helped Sikhs and was responding for Ranjit Singh to establish the first Sikh empire. 
 

You continue to short sell Hindu rulers for not defending Islamization, I don’t think they would lead to rampant takeover of India by Islam if they had succeeded in 1857.  It was a marriage of convenience between Awadh Maratha rulers and Moghuls , Sikhs didn’t join the war and were supportive of British. 

 

[coffee_rules]

4 minutes ago, randomGuy said:

 

Bit exaggerated,  imo. Esp south

[gattaca]

51 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

I know... Turkic Islamic invasion were low key loot based ones...  Malik Kafur literally raided Madurai during Khilji rule.  Dude was a unparalleled General of his times. 

 

Arab invasions on the other hand were driven mostly in the name of Prophet and Caliph... Abbasid Caliphate had proclaimed to bring India under Islamic fold...  The OG Gazwa e Hind.. 

They were conversion oriented....  Sindh and Multan bore the brunt of mass Conversion. 

Then Rulers of KasHmir and Punjab ( Lalitaditya)  and Gurjars dynasty of Bappa Rawal and co stopped their invasions.   Biggest heroes of Indian history by a humongous margin. 

 

Nagbhatta of Deccan stopped them in Central India. 

 

After that there is Nothing to show I am afraid.  

Turks were simply unstoppable 300 years later & only faced reversals in Kashmir. 

Ahoms beat the hell out of Mughals. Yet no mention in history as it was written by Muslims and communists. Aurangzeb lost so much that he finally gave up. Ahoms were smart they negotiated a treaty and broke it right away caught the Mughals off guard. They also never had stone castle so defending them was never easy for Mughals once they captured it. 

Edited April 28 by gattaca

[Lone Wolf]

9 minutes ago, gattaca said:

Ahoms beat the hell out of Mughals. Yet no mention in history as it was written by Muslims and communists. Aurangzeb lost so much that he finally gave up. Ahoms were smart they negotiated a treaty and broke it right away caught the Mughals off guard. They also never had stone castle so defending them was never easy for Mughals once they captured it. 

Ahoms were Thai settlers that came around the same time as Turks...  Bakhtiyar Khilji who ravaged Bengal had a failed campaign too that people forget in Assam...  He described these people supremely better trained and skilled than regular Indians and compared them with Turks. 

It's a shame their history isn't taught. 

[AuxiliA]

Another fresh case in MP where an entire Muslim family was torturing a kidnapped Hindu girl to convert and marry an already married Muslim man. Even that M guy's wife and mother were torturing the Hindu girl to marry him!

 

Hope bulldozer action is taken here too.

 

 

https://www.republicworld.com/india/in-alleged-case-of-love-jihad-in-gwalior-man-rapes-girl-feeds-her-with-beef-forces-to-convert/?amp=1

Edited April 28 by AuxiliA

[mishra]

I think Muslims Community leaders should be brought and told in no uncertain terms that its local mosque and its Maulavi who will be held accountable as Community is getting religious inspiration. Mosque should bocott such Muslim families specially put a nationwide ban religious interfaith marriage and conversions.

 

A countrywide single law which dictates groom must convert into girls faith and stay and abide by it for life must be brought in Modis third term.

Edited April 29 by mishra

[coffee_rules]

SHOCKING NEWS Taxi Driver Nizam allegedly kiI*Ied, cho**ped & p@cked 27 year old Hindu Girl in suitcase in Navi Mumbai.

Entire India in shock As per News18 report, Nizam was trying to date with girl. Girl found that Nizam was married and had a child.

Nizam then allegedly… pic.twitter.com/qZljtT5CUb

— Times Algebra (@TimesAlgebraIND) April 29, 2024

[coffee_rules]

Nobody covers the daily crime stories , pathraav on Ram Navami yatra, etc. Muslims living in fear in India is a global narrative