Jump to content

Rank the fast bowlers of this era in order of their bowling perdormances


Majestic

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Majestic said:

Counting those with 90+ wickets in tests:

 

Pat Cummins

Mitchell Starc

Josh Hazelwood

 

Kagiso Rabada

 

James Anderson

Stuart Broad

Mark Wood

 

Trent Boult

Tim Southee

Neil Wagner

 

Mohammad Shami

Jasprit Bumrah

 

Shaheen Shah

 

Kemar Roach

Sorry Cummins is overrated.

In terms of ability at peak level

 

1( bumrah

2) rabada

3) Cummins

4) shami 

5) hazlewood

6) andy

7) boult

8) starc

9) Wagner

10) broad

11) shaheen

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Majestic said:

Counting those with 90+ wickets in tests:

 

Pat Cummins

Mitchell Starc

Josh Hazelwood

 

Kagiso Rabada

 

James Anderson

Stuart Broad

Mark Wood

 

Trent Boult

Tim Southee

Neil Wagner

 

Mohammad Shami

Jasprit Bumrah

 

Shaheen Shah

 

Kemar Roach

this list is not complete. jason holder, shannon gabriel, umesh yadav, etc are all missing.

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, sarchasm said:

 

The hottest of hot takes. :hysterical:

Yea we all saw what happened in India vs piss poor batsmen. Record v Sri Lankas is bad too. 

 

I dont mean he isn't good. He is but he is. Boun e trck bully. 

 

Bumrah of injury free is at the top with relative ease. Shami shits on scummins in Asia too. 

Link to comment
19 minutes ago, sarchasm said:

 

Yes, but Cummins has a bigger and better body of work and now has leadership role as well. Staying injury free is a credit to him. Cummins could perform 10x worse in India or the subcontinent and he'd still stay ahead of Bumrah for me.

I look at ability. Ability wise chuckrah in form is better. Consistency due to being injury free you can give it to scummins. But he has been poor in India and lungaaa. So a no for me. 

 

Tullah rabada is another one struggled in india/lungaa and even in u.a.e to an extent. Bounce track bully to an extent. Great bowler but yes he has holes. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
3 hours ago, speedracer said:

Bumrah pre injury was better than both above him. Even now he is.

Nope not even close...A teen  Rabada was genuinely challenging every past pacer. 

Age fudger Waqar's record of youngest to  200 wickets should ideally be given to Rabada who is second on the list. 

 

Probably the last teenage sensation of our times. 

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Lone Wolf said:

Nope not even close...A teen  Rabada was genuinely challenging every past pacer. 

Age fudger Waqar's record of youngest to  200 wickets should ideally be given to Rabada who is second on the list. 

 

Probably the last teenage sensation of our times. 

When did he help SA win in India or Pakistan?

Ywa no. He won in Oz. Similar conditions to SA. 

 

Did ok in England. Nz conditions and ball is more similar to SA. Poor and quite pathetic in India and Asia overall. 

 

I dont think so. I love rabada but in terms of ability at peak form bumrah shits on him for me. 

 

Bumrah is a choker though in finals.

Link to comment
33 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Rabada lol, got outbowled by Hassan Ali and no name trundlers in Pak. Even in India he has been pathetic.

 

 

Rabada Pre & Post injury is in different league. 

That's why teen sensations have become rare.  His body wasn't able to sustain this. 

He is was in a decent shout to break age fudging Waqar's record for youngest to 200 wickets if not for the back injury   Eventually did at 25 still 3rd youngest & youngest non Asian to do that. 

 

He came too young... And was genuinely fast at 18-19 years as well.  A 90mph bowler. 

Cummins also probably would have gone on to break Waqar's record if not for injury. 

Edited by Lone Wolf
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...