Jump to content

Do NZ have the best match ups against India ? IndiaVsNZ Dharamshala - Prematch Discussion Thread.


Number

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, putrevus said:

no Ashwin?

 

not clear. The track suits seam more than spin. But he still may come in for Thakur

 

I;d have wanted Kishan though

Posted
2 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

not clear. The track suits seam more than spin. But he still may come in for Thakur

 

I;d have wanted Kishan though

Kishan adds no value though.

Posted
8 minutes ago, putrevus said:

Kishan adds no value though.

 

He does. Left hander to counter Santner in middle overs.

 

Jaddu is too high at 6. Even 7 is high for him.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

He does. Left hander to counter Santner in middle overs.

 

Jaddu is too high at 6. Even 7 is high for him.

I would drop Thakur. Ashwin and Shami replace Pandya and Thakur. 6 bowlers and five batsmen.

Posted
34 minutes ago, putrevus said:

I would drop Thakur. Ashwin and Shami replace Pandya and Thakur. 6 bowlers and five batsmen.

 

That's too bowler heavy. Need a batsman at 6 instead of Jaddu who is bowling AR

Posted
14 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

That's too bowler heavy. Need a batsman at 6 instead of Jaddu who is bowling AR

Nz manages with 20 overs from part timers. We should be able to manage 50 overs with full time bowlers including jaddu. Atleast we get  extra batsman. Worst case let us use james kohli

Posted
14 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Nz manages with 20 overs from part timers. We should be able to manage 50 overs with full time bowlers including jaddu. Atleast we get  extra batsman. Worst case let us use james kohli

 

yeah Kishan or SKY has to come in. I'd prefer Kishan to counter Santner threat as otherwise he can choke our righties.

Posted
30 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

That's too bowler heavy. Need a batsman at 6 instead of Jaddu who is bowling AR

While I dont disagree, Jaddu and Ash combined do make a genuine batsmen, given its Indian conditions. Definitely not in SENA.

 

Our batsmen are in form aside from Aussie game, so I would roll the dice. Our problem is not taking early wickets and placing pressure on the batting side.

 

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Nz manages with 20 overs from part timers. We should be able to manage 50 overs with full time bowlers including jaddu. Atleast we get  extra batsman. Worst case let us use james kohli

Kohli bowled 3 balls and they all looked good.

 

I get the feeling Kohli definitely can bowl, but doesnt want to, because of his brand.

 

If Kohli could bowl 10 overs for 60 runs, you would 100% accept that as a win.

Posted
Just now, SRT100 said:

While I dont disagree, Jaddu and Ash combined do make a genuine batsmen, given its Indian conditions. Definitely not in SENA.

 

Our batsmen are in form aside from Aussie game, so I would roll the dice. Our problem is not taking early wickets and placing pressure on the batting side.

 

 

 

The bowling is doing fine. It's what won us most games. Everyone is in form.There's no need to have additional 6th bowler.

 

Only reason I can think is they fear another injury can happen.

Posted
Just now, Lord said:

 

The bowling is doing fine. It's what won us most games. Everyone is in form.There's no need to have additional 6th bowler.

 

Only reason I can think is they fear another injury can happen.

 

India's opening bowlers have given excellent platforms for when they bowled first, it just takes one team to take advantage of this and we are looking at chasing 320+

 

I disagree. We have struggled to take early wickets in the opening few overs.

Posted
2 minutes ago, SRT100 said:

 

India's opening bowlers have given excellent platforms for when they bowled first, it just takes one team to take advantage of this and we are looking at chasing 320+

 

I disagree. We have struggled to take early wickets in the opening few overs.

 

That we can try to amend by replacing Siraj with Shami. No need to play extra bowler here compromising batting.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

That we can try to amend by replacing Siraj with Shami. No need to play extra bowler here compromising batting.

Im not against that.  However I would be more leaning SKY than Kishan.

 

6 bowlers is an overkill and having that extra batsmen does give a safety net.

 

However, if the team manager had any sense, he would be getting players like Kohli, Iyer, SKY to all practice bowling. Losing a bowler when there is just 5 is something that can easily happen.

Posted
46 minutes ago, AKane said:

Five more matches before semis.

 

Eventually people are going to figure out Kuldeep...... have to be prepared for that.

they had 10 years to figure him out. it's not like he is 20 yr old, and in the first 1-2 yr of int'l cricket.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...