Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

All debates on internet leads to ad hominem attacks and tu tu main main - Murphy’s law

 

Thats one thing but i dont think this mulogonto guy is capable of making an argument without a logical fallacy as its foundation. I already pointed them out and he responds to them by using more logical fallacies. 

Posted
1 hour ago, TellTheTruth said:

 

Thats one thing but i dont think this mulogonto guy is capable of making an argument without a logical fallacy as its foundation. I already pointed them out and he responds to them by using more logical fallacies. 

You didnt point out any logical fallacy, you only pointed out ad-hominems you engaged in. All you did, is demonstrate that you are incapable of addressing any of the objective facts i pointed out and ended up in deliberate obfuscation of trying to justify enabling voter fraud.

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

You didnt point out any logical fallacy, you only pointed out ad-hominems you engaged in. All you did, is demonstrate that you are incapable of addressing any of the objective facts i pointed out and ended up in deliberate obfuscation of trying to justify enabling voter fraud.

 

I'm not trying to sound rude or anything, but this post itself is loaded with very obvious logical fallacies. I'm really not sure how to proceed if you can't see that.

Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, TellTheTruth said:

I'm not trying to sound rude or anything, but this post itself is loaded with very obvious logical fallacies. I'm really not sure how to proceed if you can't see that.


images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQxnBjfMi8WzdDY6hwxkYG
 

Instead of schooling us all about logical fallacies, what is it that you want to say? Voter Fraud is fake news? But a lot of people have been caught voting wrongly. No?  Is voter fraud not so widespread that it affects elections? Perhaps not. But can we have a system to eliminate voter fraud even if it is 0.0000001%? It’s not that costly to implement voter ID that most of the world has implemented. What’s the push back for?

 

Next, mail-in voters regulation. Can we have a system to eliminate any fraud in mail-in votes, instead of debating if it happens or not. World’s most technologically advanced country can’t implement one such thing? Cut down a few wars so we have money to improve domestically!

Edited by coffee_rules
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

 

Voter Fraud is fake news? But a lot of people have been caught voting wrongly. No?  

This is why critical thinking and logic is important. When did I say voter fraud is fake news? 

Edited by TellTheTruth
Posted
29 minutes ago, TellTheTruth said:

This is why critical thinking and logic is important. When did I say voter fraud is fake news? 

Ok , now that we established that fact, I agree that it is not as widespread that it impacts elections. But, why is there a  push-back to regulate voter fraud? Any effort in that direction is termed as  undemocratic  and disenfranchising poor black voters by liberals . 

Posted
33 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Ok , now that we established that fact, I agree that it is not as widespread that it impacts elections. But, why is there a  push-back to regulate voter fraud? Any effort in that direction is termed as  undemocratic  and disenfranchising poor black voters by liberals . 

 

Because democrats are more likely to lose votes if Id law is applied but they can't say that directly so they claim racism while Republicans on the other hand haven't been able to prove the type of voter fraud that they claim.  

 

 

Posted
19 hours ago, TellTheTruth said:

I'm not trying to sound rude or anything, but this post itself is loaded with very obvious logical fallacies. I'm really not sure how to proceed if you can't see that.

There are no logical fallacies and stating logical fallacies incorrectly, then engaging in ad-hominem and refusal to answer the points while obfuscating is a classic liberal move.

 

Posted

It was dead on arrival. I told my wife she is going to cause a massive shellacking for Democrats as soon as she was picked.  She did damage not just to herself also the party.

Posted
1 hour ago, diga said:

How did she end up raising so much funds? 

Jews. A reason why she was not openly critiquing Israel. Ironically she lost a lot of votes in rust belt from Muslims. Muslim governor openly endorsed Trump. Even Pakistanis and other Muslims were rooting for Trump. She lost a sizable Muslim votes, latino votes  because of her stance on war in Israel. The funny thing Israel also prefers Trump lol even though Biden administration released  record amount of money to Netanyahus administration. 

Posted
2 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

It was dead on arrival. I told my wife she is going to cause a massive shellacking for Democrats as soon as she was picked.  She did damage not just to herself also the party.

 

It was not her. It was Uncle Joe. I think this was Joe's revenge to stand her up. He knew what he was doing. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, ravishingravi said:

 

It was not her. It was Uncle Joe. I think this was Joe's revenge to stand her up. He knew what he was doing. 

Not uncle Joe. Uncle Joe ran for presidency after earning popular vote in primary.  Sure he became senile. Rightly dropped out once he dropped out with just 107 days to go you should try to field an electable candidate not someone who got 0 votes in primary. That was too short a period to come up with a new message especially someon3 from incumbent administration. Strategically the worst pick. She lost 12% of latino men vote. As per the analysis that clinched the deal fo4 Trump

 

Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Jews. A reason why she was not openly critiquing Israel. Ironically she lost a lot of votes in rust belt from Muslims. Muslim governor openly endorsed Trump. Even Pakistanis and other Muslims were rooting for Trump. She lost a sizable Muslim votes, latino votes  because of her stance on war in Israel. The funny thing Israel also prefers Trump lol even though Biden administration released  record amount of money to Netanyahus administration. 

No, the hi-tech billionaires who hate Trump, like Soros, Bezos, Bloomberg etc. Jew thingy was a calculated risk, she ran for both sides and got burnt.

 

https://www.cnbctv18.com/world/us-presidential-elections-meet-the-donors-financing-the-kamala-harris-campaign-19501529.htm

Edited by coffee_rules
Posted
31 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Jews. A reason why she was not openly critiquing Israel. Ironically she lost a lot of votes in rust belt from Muslims. Muslim governor openly endorsed Trump. Even Pakistanis and other Muslims were rooting for Trump. She lost a sizable Muslim votes, latino votes  because of her stance on war in Israel. The funny thing Israel also prefers Trump lol even though Biden administration released  record amount of money to Netanyahus administration. 

Dont make up stuff. Latinos dont give a flying toss about the war in israel. They care about illegal immigration more.

 

Posted
Just now, Muloghonto said:

Dont make up stuff. Latinos dont give a flying toss about the war in israel. They care about illegal immigration more.

 

Combination of Latino and Muslim votes drowned her.

×
×
  • Create New...