Jump to content

ICC Women's T20 World Cup 2024 | Oct 3 - Oct 20, 2024 | Discussion


Tillu

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, neel roy said:

He kept Richa for the last 5 overs. We needed 40 odd from 24 with 7 wickets in hand. Very gettable. Then the usual collapse

 

The problem was letting the RR get beyond 8. The team simply doesn't have any hitting power and once the RR goes beyond 8, it's game over.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said:

Can't understand why Smriti is still part of T20. She always struggles to get a move on and wasted the PP overs. For women's team the PP overs are even more crucial as they don't have any ability to hit 6s. So make the most of PP overs and score as many as you can. And you can't do that with Smriti trudging along every match.

Smriti has lost her mojo. She plays like a fearful kitten now. She used to hit out everytime before. Now she has become so fearful i dont know why

Posted
1 minute ago, neel roy said:

He kept Richa for the last 5 overs. We needed 40 odd from 24 with 7 wickets in hand. Very gettable. Then the usual collapse

 

you can't keep hitting for the end only. Needed to keep with SR throughout

Posted

My issue is with landhana's approach she isn't power hitter,richa ghosh is too hit and miss and yes harmanpreet did score runs but at what pace need to drop landhana,also deepti has been inconsistent too many accumulators and let's face it landhana isnt cut for t20's,needs to be dropped and plz drop Mazumder as coach useless fellow 

Posted
9 minutes ago, deathmonger said:

Eng and Aus are on different levels.

 

Ind has defeated Eng a lot. Series as well as in some tourneys (CWG semi).

 

 

The one match I recall is the WC final where it was in our hands and we still somehow managed to lose it - I think around 2018 or thereabouts. They've yet to recover from that and have no belief they can get past Eng or Aus. Change the players as these ones are scarred and don't think they can do any different. Their ceiling is sneaking into SF, if they get lucky.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Bobzy the King has at least a decent WC2019 to his name... Mandhana is more like choker ABD in big events.

 

Don't disrespect ABD mentioning him with these 2. He was GOAT talent. Babar is choker in his own right and Madhana has had a few good tournaments of her own albeit with a choke.

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said:

Can't understand why Smriti is still part of T20. She always struggles to get a move on and wasted the PP overs. For women's team the PP overs are even more crucial as they don't have any ability to hit 6s. So make the most of PP overs and score as many as you can. And you can't do that with Smriti trudging along every match.

She is okay for ODI and Test where she can construct innings at her own pace. But on pitches like this you have to make the most of first 6 overs.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

Ofcourse it did. We had real chance in last few overs only because of her knock.

 

It doesn't make it look, they just didn't. You think others did okay?

 

Naah others are useless as well. Smriti shouldn't be there in the team due to her slow starts. And Shefali and Jemimah look good only in ads. But this knock from Harmanpreet is still an anchor type stats padding knock which relied on otehrs to do the heavy lifting.

 

The target was 153 and Harmanpreet scored 53 off 47 deliveries at a SR of 112. That means the rest of the team had to score 100 off 73 at a SR of 137! In Women's cricket, and especially against Aus, and given our hitting power that may as well be like asking for the moon, i.e.  not gonna happen.

 

And for the most part Harmanpreet was crawling at below run a ball. It was 2-3 boundaries at the end, when the match was already out of our hands which brought her SR above 100. Her innings was the definition of a stats padding, impactless knock which looks good on paper but in reality never gave her team much of a chance.

Posted
1 minute ago, vvvslaxman said:

She is okay for ODI and Test where she can construct innings at her own pace. But on pitches like this you have to make the most of first 6 overs.

 

Yup, great for those 2 formats but a total misfit for T20s. Even someone who plays 20(15) type of innings will be a huge upgrade over her.

Posted
Just now, Frustrated said:

Incredible that she always starts fighting once the match is lost.  LOL.   

 

Yup. She was batting at a SR below 100 for most of the innings. When the match was gone, she hit a few meaningless boundaries to make it look good on paper. Those boundaries earlier in the innings would've made a difference. Later on they were just window dressing.

Posted
13 minutes ago, neel roy said:

Smriti has lost her mojo. She plays like a fearful kitten now. She used to hit out everytime before. Now she has become so fearful i dont know why

 

Never saw her hit. Shefali or Jemimah may score quickly occasionally but Smriti has always been like a 12(16) type of player.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

Naah others are useless as well. Smriti shouldn't be there in the team due to her slow starts. And Shefali and Jemimah look good only in ads. But this knock from Harmanpreet is still an anchor type stats padding knock which relied on otehrs to do the heavy lifting.

 

The target was 153 and Harmanpreet scored 53 off 47 deliveries at a SR of 112. That means the rest of the team had to score 100 off 73 at a SR of 137! In Women's cricket, and especially against Aus, and given our hitting power that may as well be like asking for the moon, i.e.  not gonna happen.

 

And for the most part Harmanpreet was crawling at below run a ball. It was 2-3 boundaries at the end, when the match was already out of our hands which brought her SR above 100. Her innings was the definition of a stats padding, impactless knock which looks good on paper but in reality never gave her team much of a chance.

 

It doesn't work that way. Others had to support with shorter but quicker cameos and there were some extras too. 

 

Match wasn't out of the hands when she accelerated. But whenever the strike was rotated the other end was dead. 

 

It was definitely an impactful knock given how close we got from lost position, that too without zero support

Posted
4 minutes ago, Frustrated said:

Incredible that she always starts fighting once the match is lost.  LOL.   

"In most of the matches that I've played, I ended up accelerating my innings and taking the right decision in the last over, when it was too late," said Harmanpreet Mamadolla, "Similarly, my retirement also came up too late. I mean, Bangladesh could've tried out multiple youngsters in my position but I had to make sure, like the rest of the Pandavs, that I suck every single penny out of the board for as long as I can."

FB_IMG_1728842272828.jpg

Posted
Just now, Ultimate_Game said:

 

Never saw her hit. Shefali or Jemimah may score quickly occasionally but Smriti has always been like a 12(16) type of player.

I recall during the Asia Cup held couple of months ago, some ICFers were hyping her to the moon.   Labelling her as a very stylish classic female bradman  :laugh:

Posted
23 minutes ago, AuxiliA said:

 

Don't club AusW with anyone else. 

 

Ind was better than Eng during 2018-23. In the last 6-7 years Aus only lost to us in major tournaments.

 

Yes thats what my reply was.

 

England and Aus are on different levels and not the same.

 

The post I had replied to had clubbed them together.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...