Breaking: No Indian Rafale lost in Operation Sindoor

[rangeelaraja]

Our military establishment has deliberately chosen to keep everything ambigious - so as to not give away to the adversary as to what has worked for them, what has not.

 

News also coming out of the major propaganda by ChinPak to discredit the Rafale - while they have given zero evidence from their side.

 

This statement from the Dassault CEO will be taken be a grain of salt by many - but I think it will shut up the traitors from within in Congress especially. 

 

 

Edited July 7, 2025 by rangeelaraja

[Lone Wolf]

Problem with Rafale is it is still without Meteor.  French apparently haven't supplied Meteor missiles to us yet.

 

 

[gattaca]

On 7/7/2025 at 3:38 AM, Lone Wolf said:

Problem with Rafale is it is still without Meteor.  French apparently haven't supplied Meteor missiles to us yet.

 

 

Indian engineering will retrofit other missiles . This is what we have been doing. 

[Lone Wolf]

3 hours ago, gattaca said:

Indian engineering will retrofit other missiles . This is what we have been doing. 

You need source code to integrate Indian limited ranged Astra 1 BvR missiles and substantial other changes within pylons, hardpoints etc...  without source code even engineering has no point.

 

Astra 1 (60-70km) so far has been armed only with Tejas.

French Mirages are equipped with Air to Surface Missiles like Scalp etc.

For BVR air to Air combat at longer ranges we need Meteor on Rafale otherwise it is a useless white elephant for us.

 

[jf1gp_1]

No Indian Rafale lost in Operation Sindoor. They were all found by pakistani news channels. 

[ravishingravi]

 

[Gollum]

Indian military needs a dedicated PR wing like ISPR. 

[rangeelaraja]

3 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Indian military needs a dedicated PR wing like ISPR. 

 

It certainly does but don't think it will be adequate.  

 

Foreign arms lobbies, mercenaries and bought out journalists from major publications ( many of whom are on CCP payroll ) ...all aid ISPR.

 

When we did Balakot, we were asked for proof and were questioned whether this even happened effectively.

 

When we slap overwhelm proof on their faces ( 9 camps + 11 airbases ).....clear cut satellite images......suddenly it does not matter any more. 

 

What matters is how many jets we purportedly, as per Pak claims...but Pak need not provide ANY proof for their claims. 

 

Only one side has to provide proof, when they do the "victory criteria" is twisted with alternative "facts" that don't require any hard evidence.

 

The only answer to this is to shift LoC to the West with every hammering that we give them and take our media there.  This will shame the Pak army and general in front of their own jaahil awam. Also we have to play dirty. We need to cultivate foreign media to do our bidding.

 

[ravishingravi]

1 hour ago, rangeelaraja said:

 

It certainly does but don't think it will be adequate.  

 

Foreign arms lobbies, mercenaries and bought out journalists from major publications ( many of whom are on CCP payroll ) ...all aid ISPR.

 

When we did Balakot, we were asked for proof and were questioned whether this even happened effectively.

 

When we slap overwhelm proof on their faces ( 9 camps + 11 airbases ).....clear cut satellite images......suddenly it does not matter any more. 

 

What matters is how many jets we purportedly, as per Pak claims...but Pak need not provide ANY proof for their claims. 

 

Only one side has to provide proof, when they do the "victory criteria" is twisted with alternative "facts" that don't require any hard evidence.

 

The only answer to this is to shift LoC to the West with every hammering that we give them and take our media there.  This will shame the Pak army and general in front of their own jaahil awam. Also we have to play dirty. We need to cultivate foreign media to do our bidding.

 

 

This or next year. Insha Ganesha

[MechEng]

5 hours ago, Gollum said:

Indian military needs a dedicated PR wing like ISPR. 

 

It's nice to have, but not needed.

 

All the shitshow began with that CDS interview. When your enemy is not revealing their losses, what was the need to speak?

[MechEng]

6 hours ago, rangeelaraja said:

 

It certainly does but don't think it will be adequate.  

 

Foreign arms lobbies, mercenaries and bought out journalists from major publications ( many of whom are on CCP payroll ) ...all aid ISPR.

 

When we did Balakot, we were asked for proof and were questioned whether this even happened effectively.

 

When we slap overwhelm proof on their faces ( 9 camps + 11 airbases ).....clear cut satellite images......suddenly it does not matter any more. 

 

What matters is how many jets we purportedly, as per Pak claims...but Pak need not provide ANY proof for their claims. 

 

Only one side has to provide proof, when they do the "victory criteria" is twisted with alternative "facts" that don't require any hard evidence.

 

The only answer to this is to shift LoC to the West with every hammering that we give them and take our media there.  This will shame the Pak army and general in front of their own jaahil awam. Also we have to play dirty. We need to cultivate foreign media to do our bidding.

 

 

I'm not a malevolent peron, but I'll happy the day when Uyhurs become violent and start attacking PLA like Baloch liberation folks are doing to Pakjabi forces.

 

Proper karma.

Edited July 10, 2025 by MechEng