Jump to content

From one statistical perspective, Prasidh Krishna was the best bowler in the series


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, Trichromatic said:

Bowlers should look to be economical first.

 

All talented bowlers became better when they became economical.

So true, You cannot become better bowlers if you keep leaking boundaries every ovar. PK is a run leaking machine. 

Edited by putrevus
Posted
12 hours ago, Lord said:

In Tests wickets matter more. Trundlers will stop runs but it's useless. I'd have wicket taker any day 

 

Not saying he's perfect, but would have him any day over trundlers 

An opposition scoring 620 a.o in 120 overs doesn’t help as well .. 

Posted
2 hours ago, figo6762 said:

An opposition scoring 620 a.o in 120 overs doesn’t help as well .. 

 

That;'s an extreme example. Does an opposition scoring 200/2 in 80 overs help? they will always accelerate from that base

Posted
On 8/11/2025 at 7:40 AM, Lord said:

In Tests wickets matter more. Trundlers will stop runs but it's useless. I'd have wicket taker any day 

 

Not saying he's perfect, but would have him any day over trundlers 


That’s a myth.

 

Those who stop runs take wickets also.

Posted
On 8/8/2025 at 10:32 PM, BacktoCricaddict said:

Seriously, listen me out here.

 

I have been one of Prasidh Krishna's biggest critics on this forum, but he elicited the highest rate of false shots of any bowler in the entire series - 28.7% of his deliveries induced a false shot. Next was Siraj at 26.8% and Bumrah at 24.4 %. England's best was Gus Atkinson at 22.2%.  So, from this statistical perspective, one could argue that he was the best bowler in the series.

 

Only 1 out of every 13 false shots fetched him a wicket (the lowest ratio of any bowler), so one could argue that he was the unluckiest bowler.

 

Or should we argue that they must change the definition of what constitutes a false shot?  Which brings up the question - how *do* they define a false shot?

 

 

 

 

That  false shot must be hitting a single or double instead of a four or a six .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...