nitinbwj Posted February 9 Posted February 9 1 minute ago, rangeelaraja said: Rakesh @raki05 . Do we need a tri series with the 2 ISLAMIC republics ? Which has been rejected by ICC as it doesn't come under their jurisdiction addicted4444, raki05 and spiritb2 1 1 1
nitinbwj Posted February 9 Posted February 9 MChod BCCI Haram ke jane have once again started bending their behinds for Napak's ****. Thuu hai BC
deathmonger Posted February 9 Posted February 9 Thing is BCB will anyways mend ties with India once new government comes in and bilaterals with them will happen anyway. addicted4444 1
nitinbwj Posted February 9 Posted February 9 Just now, deathmonger said: Thing is BCB will anyways mend ties with India once new government comes in and bilaterals with them will happen anyway. I would rather have matches with Nepal than this ugly mfing Kanglus lemsip and raki05 1 1
mishra Posted February 9 Posted February 9 1 hour ago, jf1gp_1 said: Wait.. who is bulbul ? There are two guys Asif Nazrul and Aminul Islam Bulbul. Asif Nazrul is Yunius Adminstration apointee, He is Zamaat person and was doing all pro Pakistan and anti India statements in media while Bulbul kept silent because under Yunus adminsitration, anyone opposing Zamaat was / is being tried and sent to prison while mobs will attack the houses and family. So, story is slightly deeper than what is in media. hence I told , Post Feb 12 elections, Things will change with BCB. addicted4444 1
lemsip Posted February 9 Posted February 9 Pakistan can be relied upon to shoot themselves in the foot. The only reason they have any commercial return from international cricket broadcasts is because of their enmity with India that helps promote these fixtures. Outside of that they have nothing. They neither have charismatic players or a team that broadcasters would want to pay up for. Hopefully the inability to get any concerssions at all will help some of the less deluded folks in Pakistan seethat they are only being sustained by India playing with them. Take that away and there would no difference between them and Zimbabwe.
Tillu Posted February 9 Posted February 9 The ICC granted a special window for the IPL in return for India playing a tournament every year. So we'll have to continue tolerating the PCB tantrums every year as the ICC cannot live without the India Pakistan fixtures every tournament. BCCI cannot do anything as it will put their IPL plans and window in a jeopardy. Bollywood and Indian cricket hardly generate 1 billion $ each towards our country's GDP but make the most useless noise every year.
putrevus Posted February 9 Posted February 9 (edited) Just now, Tillu said: The ICC granted a special window for the IPL in return for India playing a tournament every year. So we'll have to continue tolerating the PCB tantrums every year as the ICC cannot live without the India Pakistan fixtures every tournament. BCCI cannot do anything as it will put their IPL plans and window in a jeopardy. Bollywood and Indian cricket hardly generate 1 billion $ each towards our country's GDP but make the most useless noise every year. No they didn't grant any special windows, no cricket is played in summer months in other countries. Edited February 9 by putrevus
deathmonger Posted February 9 Posted February 9 16 minutes ago, nitinbwj said: I would rather have matches with Nepal than this ugly mfing Kanglus Naah, having subservient Kangludesh is useful for us. India killed off lots of NE separatists under Hasina's rule. raki05 1
Lone Wolf Posted February 9 Posted February 9 45 minutes ago, raki05 said: And you are sure icc will accept all their demands on behalf of bcci. Folks here overvalue pakistani a lot.. same randi rona they were doing when kangalus were demanding to move their match out of india, cut 2 the have been shown their aukaat. Pakistani does these RR all the time be it 23 wc 16 t20 wc not sure why folks getting twist in their panties, especially those who are galaxy away from subcontinent. Old BCCI won't even entertain these Bhikharis and would rather screw them over and squeeze money Outta them. Current lot is besharam and took an entire tournament (Asia Cup) out of India to accomodate Pak and signed some lodu aggrement with Chor Nakvi that Indo -Pak matches will only happen in neutral place no matter who is the host. The nepo chairman couldn't even bring Asia Cup trophy home which India rightfully won.
deathmonger Posted February 9 Posted February 9 (edited) 6 minutes ago, putrevus said: No they didn't grant any special windows, no cricket is played in summer months. Naah. West Indies tests used to be played in that window. Even Pak-Ind tests. The 2004 Pak test series was in April. Edited February 9 by deathmonger
deathmonger Posted February 9 Posted February 9 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Tillu said: The ICC granted a special window for the IPL in return for India playing a tournament every year. So we'll have to continue tolerating the PCB tantrums every year as the ICC cannot live without the India Pakistan fixtures every tournament. BCCI cannot do anything as it will put their IPL plans and window in a jeopardy. Bollywood and Indian cricket hardly generate 1 billion $ each towards our country's GDP but make the most useless noise every year. Naah the reverse. ICC gave a window not out of goodwill because a lot of players were rebelling and leaving. PCB can keep throwing tantrums but none of them will be accepted. If BCCI split with ICC, it is international cricket that will be affected not IPL. Anyways this is a moot point. ICC-BCCI are aligned. It is PCB who is the outsider. Edited February 9 by deathmonger raki05 and addicted4444 2
Tillu Posted February 9 Posted February 9 Just now, putrevus said: No they didn't grant any special windows, no cricket is played in summer months. ICCs leverage against BCCI is they could stop giving NOCs from players attending the tournament. This is a quid pro quo arrangement between ICC and BCCI. ICC grants a special window to IPL in return for BCCI agreeing to an ICC tournament every year. Also a long bilateral test series to Australia and England for allowing their players in IPL.
deathmonger Posted February 9 Posted February 9 1 minute ago, Tillu said: ICCs leverage against BCCI is they could stop giving NOCs from players attending the tournament. This is a quid pro quo arrangement between ICC and BCCI. ICC grants a special window to IPL in return for BCCI agreeing to an ICC tournament every year. Also a long bilateral test series to Australia and England for allowing their players in IPL. Thing is this is a mutually beneficial arrangement and how the world works. Pak can keep making noise but they will always back out because ICC/other boards don't have same equation with them as they have with BCCI. It's not Pak that has leverage with ICC. It's the opposite. See them backtrack this with no concessions just like in AC 2025. No one touched Andy Pycroft. raki05 1
Tillu Posted February 9 Posted February 9 3 minutes ago, deathmonger said: Naah the reverse. ICC gave a window not out of goodwill because a lot of players were rebelling and leaving. PCB can keep throwing tantrums but none of them will be accepted. If BCCI split with ICC, it is international cricket that will be affected not IPL. Anyways this is a moot point. ICC-BCCI are aligned. It is PCB who is the outsider. BCCI splitting with ICC is just hypothetical. BCCI wouldn't jeopardise something highly profitable right now insearch of something which may never materialise by splitting with the ICC.
deathmonger Posted February 9 Posted February 9 3 minutes ago, Tillu said: BCCI splitting with ICC is just hypothetical. BCCI wouldn't jeopardise something highly profitable right now insearch of something which may never materialise by splitting with the ICC. Yeah, they won't split. Similarly ICC won't make BCCI do anything it doesn't want to with regards to PCB. It is a mutually beneficial relationship. addicted4444 and Tillu 2
rkt.india Posted February 9 Posted February 9 17 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said: Old BCCI won't even entertain these Bhikharis and would rather screw them over and squeeze money Outta them. Current lot is besharam and took an entire tournament (Asia Cup) out of India to accomodate Pak and signed some lodu aggrement with Chor Nakvi that Indo -Pak matches will only happen in neutral place no matter who is the host. The nepo chairman couldn't even bring Asia Cup trophy home which India rightfully won. Which nepo chairman?
Strangering Posted February 9 Posted February 9 The Jeopardy of agreeing to any demands through blackmailing is just unacceptable. ICC should not agree to anything. Such a strange situation...
deathmonger Posted February 9 Posted February 9 8 minutes ago, Strangering said: The Jeopardy of agreeing to any demands through blackmailing is just unacceptable. ICC should not agree to anything. Such a strange situation... It won't. Remember the Andy Pycroft saga. raki05 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now