Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, bowl_out said:

Or should have let KKR pick him for 12.8cr and struggle more. 

Pathetic decision to pick him when Urvil was already in the squad and firing 

Which pragaspathi played a role in pushing for him. Given that they entered late in the race, it is almost like they did as an after thought. Moment everyone started bidding , they probably thought.. oh "may be he is good" kind of pick. I am not sure it doesn't look like a well researched pick

Posted (edited)

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/sarfraz-khan-exposed-the-1-98-crore-hole-in-csks-kartik-sharma-and-prashant-veer-investment-101775415680129.html

 

 

They are not holding back in the press lol

 

Sarfaraz’s one innings made CSK’s expensive pair look like a bad investment

Spread across a 14-match league phase, Kartik Sharma and Prashant Veer together cost CSK roughly 2.03 crore per match. In Bengaluru, when their output is measured against the value benchmark set by Sarfaraz’s innings, that combined return comes to only around 4.54 lakh.

Which means the shortfall from that one match alone sits at roughly 1.98 crore.

That is not a small cricketing miss. That is the kind of money that can fund a lavish Indian wedding, or cover rent of 1 lakh a month for more than 16 years, or pay a 50,000 monthly salary for around 33 years. CSK put that kind of value on the field in one game and got back less than what their 75 lakh batter delivered alone.

 

 

Edited by vvvslaxman
Posted
18 hours ago, Ultimate_Game said:

CSK win this contest by a distance with KKR in the 2nd spot. No other contenders in sight with LSG and Goenka winning the consolation prize.

What's the disaster with LSG?

×
×
  • Create New...