Jump to content

Ravichandran Ashwin


Recommended Posts

Posted
If we play 3-spin attack on raging turners, it is difficult for just one bowler to dominate; see e.g. WI pace quartet where max wkts per match was only 4.7 or so for Croft, and around 4 to 4.3 for the rest. Secondly, even he can be prone to losses of form. Started career very well against WI and others, and then, on home pitches, Captain Cook and co walloped him (one reason why we lost; since Pragyan Ojha was doing allright). Thirdly, getting wickets in SA and Eng won't be that easy - both will prepare green pitches when we tour, both to negate our spinner(s) and batsmen. WI yes.
1. Yes, 3 spinners at home means odds are lesser. Agreed. But he got a lot of wickets in that Aus home series when 3 spinners played every game. 2. Loss of form is a valid concern but solid technical base (which he has developed now) will lessen the odds. 3. England has pitches that aid spin decently (some tracks). Ashwin got 3/72 in his last innings there (and he was hardly as good as now). Even the green Lord's track spun big in the last day which Jaddu didn't exploit. England, SA have a good mixture of wickets. All aid pace. Some aid spin too. WI aids spin. Aus and NZ are graveyards. I am not saying Ashwin will get those 6 wickets a match (but he does have a ridiculous rate for getting 5fers and he will be bowling with a SG ball on rank turners/very good spin tracks a lot of times). I am just speculating talking about the pros and cons considering 1. Pitches 2. Ball used 3. Countries which help spin at some level
Posted
One could claim the same for Yasir Shah' date=' as long as he plays much of his cricket in UAE and SC. Only about 1/2 year in age separating them.[/quote'] I sooo didn't say that if Ashwin only plays in India or SC. :cantstop:
Posted
That he beat Cook with few odd deliveries doesn't mean much. Avg of 52 tells its own story; was also expensive going at 3.1 an over when Ojha went for 2.4 and Jaddu at 1.7; even the googly bowler Chawla (with no legbreaks) went at 2.8 and avg much better.
When did I say it meant much? The point was he could still bowl the good ones but his other deliveries were bad that no pressure could be created.
Posted

Did well today... he is going to beat Bhajji's records if he is able to sustain his fitness levels ps: BTW Mishraji had a match aggregate of 7/70 odd while Ashwin had figures of 7/110

Posted
What HAS Murali been smoking? :omg: The only man who took close to 6+ wkts per match after 50+ Tests was Murali himself.
If he keeps playing on pitches like these.
Posted

All of these records are far away. Many bowlers start off really well and then dwindle down. Ashwin has done well in quite a few tests but it is still too early to predict how he will do.

Posted
1. Yes, 3 spinners at home means odds are lesser. Agreed. But he got a lot of wickets in that Aus home series when 3 spinners played every game. 2. Loss of form is a valid concern but solid technical base (which he has developed now) will lessen the odds. 3. England has pitches that aid spin decently (some tracks). Ashwin got 3/72 in his last innings there (and he was hardly as good as now). Even the green Lord's track spun big in the last day which Jaddu didn't exploit. England, SA have a good mixture of wickets. All aid pace. Some aid spin too. WI aids spin. Aus and NZ are graveyards. I am not saying Ashwin will get those 6 wickets a match (but he does have a ridiculous rate for getting 5fers and he will be bowling with a SG ball on rank turners/very good spin tracks a lot of times). I am just speculating talking about the pros and cons considering 1. Pitches 2. Ball used 3. Countries which help spin at some level
Ashwin's progress in the next few years will indeed be fascinating, as will the batsmen's strategies to counter him.
Posted
Did well today... he is going to beat Bhajji's records if he is able to sustain his fitness levels ps: BTW Mishraji had a match aggregate of 7/70 odd while Ashwin had figures of 7/110
Yes, Mishy has been unfairly forgotten... his bowling avg this series is phenomenal, best on both sides I think.
Posted

all these stats doesn't mean anything, if india is not winning matches consistently.....We are so crazy about stats.... BTW, he can contribute more to the team, if he can get back his batting form without loosing focus on bowling

Posted
all these stats doesn't mean anything, if india is not winning matches consistently.....We are so crazy about stats.... BTW, he can contribute more to the team, if he can get back his batting form without loosing focus on bowling
Seems unlikely to me. Doesn't appear very interested in batting based on evidence this series. Came, threw his bat around, hit-and-giggle and then left.
Posted
Ashwin is a very good bowler but Ishant will beat him to 200 wickets. :giggle:
Nah Pishant will take another 1 year minimum to pick the remaining 10 wkts to reach 200 ,meanwhile ashwin needs 2 more series :giggle:
Posted
Just cos Ashwin picked up a few wickets...let's not sling mud at the true legendary bowler of Indian cricket.
Pisshant Sharma?
Posted
Sharma. Ishant Sharma. Soon you guys will see who he is. He is getting there.
:hysterical: Nice post! To paraphrase Blade Runner: "I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Ishant in full attack mode, on fire, on the coasts of Aus, SA and Eng." As if. I'll be a monkey's uncle when that happens.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...