Jump to content

Shami ahmed-First impression..!!!


Blue Panther

Recommended Posts

Nice analysis. Bhuvi actually does go inside his right shoulder to deliver and hence does not use his shoulder strength fully. He is very wrist dependant. It would not be easy for him to increase pace with this action, like Hilfy has . Hilfy's action uses his right shoulder more. I think PK has an action similar to BK in some ways and he too finds it difficult to hit the deck hard. This action is more conducive to floating the ball.
No, PK had better action. He could do both things outswing and inswing but his ounswing was better because he used to bowl from a straighter arm and used his wrist to swing the ball both ways but his flaws were in his runup and followthrough as they were nonexistent. PK is like a quicker version of Kumble. Look at Anderson who swings the ball both ways too but uses his wrist and seam position for different type of swings rather than his arm. BK gets great inswing due his arm coming inside the right shoulder but that does lead to loss of pace.
Link to comment
No' date=' PK had better action. He could do both things outswing and inswing but his ounswing was better because he used to bowl from a straighter arm and used his wrist to swing the ball both ways but his flaws were in his runup and followthrough as they were nonexistent. PK is like a quicker version of Kumble. Look at Anderson who swings the ball both ways too but uses his wrist and seam position for different type of swings rather than his arm. BK gets great inswing due his arm coming inside the right shoulder but that does lead to loss of pace.[/quote'] inswing bowler in general are less successful than outswing bowlers am i right?
Link to comment
inswing bowler in general are less successful than outswing bowlers am i right?
yeah but most in swing bowler have decent bowl which holds up its line so that makes them dangerous ..but most batsmen can deal with just inswing easily...but if you can bowl them both ways that makes you world class :--D
Link to comment
yeah but most in swing bowler have decent bowl which holds up its line so that makes them dangerous ..but most batsmen can deal with just inswing easily...but if you can bowl them both ways that makes you world class :--D
You don't need to swing it both ways, as long as you has one which just holds up. For example, Steyn's variation is not an inswing, his delivery just holds the line and goes straight. It is very effective as his regular balls swings a lot, so batsmen get trapped LBW or bowled on his straighter ones. Similarly for an inswing bowler, if his variation is one which holds his line, he can get the batsmen to edge behind Just check the first two wickets here The balls are outswingers which don't swing much but just enough. The third is an inswinger which swings like crazy 4es_0rsvaNQ
Link to comment
You don't need to swing it both ways, as long as you has one which just holds up. For example, Steyn's variation is not an inswing, his delivery just holds the line and goes straight. It is very effective as his regular balls swings a lot, so batsmen get trapped LBW or bowled on his straighter ones. Similarly for an inswing bowler, if his variation is one which holds his line, he can get the batsmen to edge behind Just check the first two wickets here The balls are outswingers which don't swing much but just enough. The third is an inswinger which swings like crazy 4es_0rsvaNQ
Bhuvi swings them both ways and Steyn has pace and he swings them from UN playable areas .. Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Link to comment
inswing bowler in general are less successful than outswing bowlers am i right?
It is mostly opposite in Indian FC cricket. Low bounce pitches, edges do not carry to slips, so I have seen more predominantly inswing bowlers than outswing bowlers in domestic though most of them have the ability to hold the ball straight but great outswing. Inswing brings LBW and bowled into play more than outswing.
Link to comment
You don't need to swing it both ways, as long as you has one which just holds up. For example, Steyn's variation is not an inswing, his delivery just holds the line and goes straight. It is very effective as his regular balls swings a lot, so batsmen get trapped LBW or bowled on his straighter ones. Similarly for an inswing bowler, if his variation is one which holds his line, he can get the batsmen to edge behind Just check the first two wickets here The balls are outswingers which don't swing much but just enough. The third is an inswinger which swings like crazy 4es_0rsvaNQ[/youtub
yes, he does that but they are not proper outswingers. They more more often ball just holds it line. He does swign away from right handers but they are mostly far wide of off stump. His bowling action needs a bit of technical rectification and with his seam and wrist position he can be even better even will gain pace if he does that. His use of left can be better and lateral flexion can be reduced. His body is flexible, otherwise, he would get lot of injuries with the present action which puts too much pressure on his left side of the back.
Link to comment

Recently, Cricinfo updated his status from fast-medium to fast. Few bowlers have increased their pace mid-career, especially to world-class level. cricinfo is anti indian website mostly, shami seems to be bowling faster than NCN but NCN is 'fast' shami probably would be listed 'medium' ...hell yadav was listed 'medium' for a long time now he is 'fast medium'. I dont read much into their descriptions, its based on what the bowler apparently bowls if he is 138 + average he is fast..shami is 140 average in the three games he bowled that's faster than what Yadav managed in some games, although Yadav definitely bowls much quicker peaks and uses more slower ones.. But yeah Ryan Harris is a special bowler aus spearhead now.

Link to comment
Recently' date=' Cricinfo updated his status from fast-medium to fast. Few bowlers have increased their pace mid-career, especially to world-class level.[/color'] cricinfo is anti indian website mostly, shami seems to be bowling faster than NCN but NCN is 'fast' shami probably would be listed 'medium' ...hell yadav was listed 'medium' for a long time now he is 'fast medium'. I dont read much into their descriptions, its based on what the bowler apparently bowls if he is 138 + average he is fast..shami is 140 average in the three games he bowled that's faster than what Yadav managed in some games, although Yadav definitely bowls much quicker peaks and uses more slower ones.. But yeah Ryan Harris is a special bowler aus spearhead now.
You have made a very good point here. This topic deserves a separate thread. You can make it . Cricinfo is definitely an anti Indian bowler website for sure. According to them -- Umesh , who bowls 137 to 150 k , is Fast Medium !! Aaron , who bowls similar speeds, is medium. !! Shami is medium, !! Srinath, who was at times quicker than Donald, is Fast-medium. !! NCN, who bowls 135 to 142 k, is Fast. Cricinfo's classification cannot be trusted.
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...