Lord Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 He may end up being a workhorse type of bowler who creates pressure on one end but doesn't have the strike capabilities expected of a spearhead. Which is ok. Siddle is a good example of a workhorse.not as gifted as other n as many variations but constantly at the batsmen n building pressure.Ishant isnt that.he bowls too much outside off.
CG Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 Pitch itself has to provide assistance for him to be effective. On a decent batting surface he is simply not good enough to extract life. He just relies on angles nothing more. He has to generate movement off the seam or in the air. He neither has a good bouncer nor a good yorker. So limited variations. Relies largely on the response from surface. Total Rubbish-Here is a simple look at his home and away record Career averages Span Mat Runs HS Bat Av 100 Wkts BBI Bowl Av 5 Career- 2007-2011 42 383 31* 10.94 0 128 6/55 36.20 3 11 0 Profile Home- 2007-2011 16 128 31 11.63 0 51 5/118 32.17 1 5 0 He has done well on dead indian surface ,If we breakdown his performances overseas He had problems with his action on tour of southafrica and came back with some modifications to his action and was back in the 140+ speed but missing the inswinger which made him a handful in his first 3 years,Ishant is best when he holds the ball lightly and gives a whip with his wrist nowadays he is holding the ball far too deep and not imparting the whip he used too like here and also he is too close to stumps while bowling which affects his inswinger. 72AyIbXlx5U&feature=related Unless he gets his inswinger going his ability to take wickets is going to be hampered.
cowboysfan Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 He has to pitch the damn thing up And make the batsmen play...
ShebbySB Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 He'll take more wkts in the 2nd innings.Totally a different bowler when Zak guides him.
Lord Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 He'll take more wkts in the 2nd innings.Totally a different bowler when Zak guides him. why didnt Zak do that in 1st innings:dontknow:
ShebbySB Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 why didnt Zak do that in 1st innings:dontknow: Probably Zak himself was bit out of sort initially so he was only concentrating on his own game but now he's back in form & confident.So he'll be more involved for sure.
Laaloo Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 He needs to stop bowling short balls down the leg side to the freaking tailenders especially when you can't pitch the ball up
The Realist Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 there is no use bowling an occasional good ball if you cant get wickets' date='Ishant is lucky that we dont have any capable replacement for him right now.[/quote'] Exactly. There is no use being a nearly man when you only have 4 bowlers. He has to take wickets, that is what he is in the team for. You don't carry on picking forwards in football if they can't score goals, same applies to bowlers in cricket. Only so long you can persist with a passenger in a 4 man attack.
HouMac Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 Obviously, a more consistent line and length is a given, but the biggest reason he doesn't pick wickets is b/c he just bowls too damn straight. You are not picking wickets if you can't move the ball.
MCcricket Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 A few balls he bowled were unplayable, he needs to bowl that length where the batsmen is not sure if he has to come forward or stay back, with his natural ball coming in, if he targets that area more and attacks the stumps, aim to hit the top of off stumps.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now