Jump to content

India reach 400 wins!


Sidhoni

Recommended Posts

Posted
:wall::wall::wall::wall: What a stupid question!!! Madame, I give you an example, check out India's figures- Total matches- 373 Wins- 201 Losses- 152 Tied- 3 No Result- 17 So, Total is 373. It's similar with the all the teams and all the figures shown.
You haven't understood the question. For eg, if there is a game that has no result/tie, it is a no result/tie for both the teams. Still the total number of wins and losses for all the teams combined should be the same. If Pak is playing SL, and SL wins. Its 1 in win column for SL and 1 in loss column for Pak. So when you add all wins (of all the teams) and losses (of all the teams) over the decade shouldn't it come to the same number? Where am I making a mistake with this line of reasoning?
Posted
You haven't understood the question. For eg, if there is a game that has no result/tie, it is a no result/tie for both the teams. Still the total number of wins and losses for all the teams combined should be the same. If Pak is playing SL, and SL wins. Its 1 in win column for SL and 1 in loss column for Pak. So when you add all wins (of all the teams) and losses (of all the teams) over the decade shouldn't it come to the same number? Where am I making a mistake with this line of reasoning?
There's bound to be discrepancy if you factor in games against teams other than the top8, against associate nations (especially in WCs, Champions trophy & Asia Cup) or against teams such as Asia XI, World X! etc. which were approved as official odis.
Posted
^ SL were minnow once. :dontknow:
hm so should the boundary for SL be 1995. They were WC champs in 1996 so. amazing, SL is vindicated a bit with post 1995. 20sy694.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...