Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

T20 is no place for measuring speeds.People watch this matches and say xyz has lost pace in tests and odis.I started this thread in Ipl 2 or 1 I do not remember.Every match we had fastest ball by indian and match fastest.If it would be in that format atleast it would show the speed gun errors.

Posted
Rahul Shukla is noting Specail Same with Yadav and others India need Junaid khan Type of WORLD Class fast bowler
Chup kar vai ab rulaiga kya..........:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Posted

5 of the fastest bowlers ri8 now in world cricket(who are playing intl cricket) are Steyn,Best,Yadav,Morkel & Pattinson.Finn & Roach have lost a bit of pace & Aaron along with Pat Cummins are always injured.Though we don't have an express bowler in the world cricket ri8 now like Akhtar,Lee,Bond or Tait.

Posted

Yesterday's match again showed why Indian fast bowlers are always going to be the problem. They simply do not have the temperament nor the pressure abilities to handle tough situations. Although, IPL should deserve some credit as at least these bowlers are getting some practice in these situation. No other domestic competition will offer this kind of pressure. And thus we have improved in this dimension compared 5 years back.

Posted

Bond was 145 to 150k bowler.Sometimes touching 153k.If Yadav qnd Steyn are not express neither is Bond. Shannon Gabriel is as quick as anyone on that list and so is Johnson. Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk 2

Posted
Bond was 145 to 150k bowler.Sometimes touching 153k.If Yadav qnd Steyn are not express neither is Bond. Shannon Gabriel is as quick as anyone on that list and so is Johnson. Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk 2
Agree.. BTW awesome bowling by bhuvan today.. Just bcos he has Kumar in his name people don't really support him enough:giggle:
Posted
Bond was 145 to 150k bowler.Sometimes touching 153k.If Yadav qnd Steyn are not express neither is Bond. Shannon Gabriel is as quick as anyone on that list and so is Johnson. Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk 2
Bond at his prime touched 160K. He is one of the 5-6 fast bowlers to have done that and those are all express bowlers Thomson, Lee, Akhtar, and Tait. He slowed down due to injuries but he was express at his best, quicker than any right now. Even in his last test series against Pak, he clocked 151 as quick as any you would see and he was supposed to be slowed down by then due to injuries.
Posted
157kph can be Error but most of his Ball,s were over 140kph
Rana adil is 140+ but not 157, he is as quick as any bowler in pak apart from sami maybe.
Posted
Bond at his prime touched 160K. He is one of the 5-6 fast bowlers to have done that and those are all express bowlers Thomson' date=' Lee, Akhtar, and Tait. He slowed down due to injuries but he was express at his best, quicker than any right now. Even in his last test series against Pak, he clocked 151 as quick as any you would see and he was supposed to be slowed down by then due to injuries.[/quote'] Bond never touched 160k.if he did show me a video of that or an article.His fastest was around 96MPH in 2003 WC.
Posted

Among pacers who have played sufficient test matches, I think only Thomson, Akhtar and Lee were consistently express. All the others were either occasionally express ( generally fast ) or could not play sufficient tests.

Posted
Holding and Roberts were express.Roberts was timed at 159.6ks at Perth and Holding was quicker than him according to most batsmen.
Question is -- what were their general speeds like ? ( not the occasional faster spell ) From the numerous videos available of their bowling , they looked fast, not express. Even the wicket keeper did not stand as deep as Thommo etc. Obviously, it would be difficult to say anything with certainty as speed guns were rarely used.
Posted

Guys This is regards speed and perforance of Indian fast bowlers in IPL U guys r talking about Great fast bowlers ....that's Cool but focus on Indian Upcoming fast bowlers+ Where are Rahul Shukla and Jasprit bumrah.....why there Teams R not picking them They have performed very well

Posted

most 160+ speeds are bogus, i think only lee and tait acheived them in real life. Akthar was probably speed gun error as he was mostly 135-150 otherwise, and Thommo and his grand mom both probably reached 200 kph also..

Posted
Holding and Roberts were express.Roberts was timed at 159.6ks at Perth and Holding was quicker than him according to most batsmen.
Roberts was barely clocking 135 in fast bowlers competition. Don't know why people exaggerate them.
Posted
Roberts was barely clocking 135 in fast bowlers competition. Don't know why people exaggerate them.
Andy roberts was considered as quite fast at that time ,.Several sites mention his name as fastest bowler .135 is a pace which even vinay and Bhuvenshwar Kumar can bowl. There are two possibilities that either the batsmen of that time were mediocre who used to fear 135 kmph or he was genuinly quick
Posted
Andy roberts was considered as quite fast at that time ,.Several sites mention his name as fastest bowler .135 is a pace which even vinay and Bhuvenshwar Kumar can bowl. There are two possibilities that either the batsmen of that time were mediocre who used to fear 135 kmph or he was genuinly quick
Yaar. There were no speed guns at that time during matches. From naked eyes, even 135-140K looks quite quick. Batsmen now have also gotten better in terms of facing genuine pace. He must be quicker that that at his peak, but dont think Roberts was an express bowler. There have been only 3-4 express bowlers in history Thomson, Akhtar, Lee, Tait. Some say Frank Tyson was an express bowler too.
×
×
  • Create New...