SLICKR392 Posted February 2, 2013 Posted February 2, 2013 We have been a pathetic batting line up . I don't mind the comments on ICF but you should have headed over to CI's Pak experts mocking NZ's performance and bragging about how Pak line up would make SA sweat. You can see them below the Day 2 reports.
Vivek.S.123 Posted February 2, 2013 Posted February 2, 2013 Are talking about that classy inform batting side that toured over two years ago or the clowns who were made to look average by a no body in Junaid khan on Indian pitches. SIr Jadeja made England batting look clueless :giggle:
Haarkarjeetgaye Posted February 3, 2013 Posted February 3, 2013 dont know how much but 50 will be enough enough to rub it in and remind our friendly neighbours of 65 / 71 and 99
Trichromatic Posted February 3, 2013 Posted February 3, 2013 Come on guys, be honest. How many runs our batsmen would have scored against this South African bowling attack? I would say 250+... This team struggled to score 200 on home tracks against England. On a flat pitch of Kolkata, I saw them losing 6 wickets in an hour. This team couldn't score against Finn, Anderson and Monty on HOME tracks. Lost matches by innings away and hardly managed to save inning defeat in India.
Trichromatic Posted February 3, 2013 Posted February 3, 2013 India's scores against England and Australia recently No code has to be inserted here. 23 Innings Scores below 200 - 6 Scores below 250 - 10 Scores below 300 - 17 Opposition scores in 20 innings 700+ 1 600+ 3 500+ 7 400+ 10 Score below 200 - 1 Score below 300 - 3
Marut Posted February 3, 2013 Posted February 3, 2013 This team struggled to score 200 on home tracks against England. On a flat pitch of Kolkata, I saw them losing 6 wickets in an hour. This team couldn't score against Finn, Anderson and Monty on HOME tracks. Lost matches by innings away and hardly managed to save inning defeat in India. But then they scored 300 in England and 400 in Australia. And they did score 500 against England at home. It all depends on the form for a particular match. The overall skills of the team are not high. but this Indian team can cross 200 more often than not, regardless of the bowling or match conditions. And they will struggle to get 400 or 500 like they did in the past, regardless of the conditions.
gs Posted February 3, 2013 Posted February 3, 2013 Hope they score more than 66 and 100. The current batting line up gives me major 90s flashback. At least we were tigers on home pitches back then.
JaFanatic Posted February 3, 2013 Posted February 3, 2013 lol at the paki trolls trying to mock us:hysterical:
Lord Posted February 3, 2013 Posted February 3, 2013 was tht type or intentional ? :cantstop: intentional:giggle:
India-KXIP fan Posted February 3, 2013 Posted February 3, 2013 SA got out to poor shots and gave wickets away against Hafeez. Pak bowlers were mediocre in this game too. In our last test series, Zaheer, Sree, Ishant bowled alright but Harbhajan Singh bowled superbly. Fixed Anyway about 350
Iconoclast Posted February 3, 2013 Posted February 3, 2013 India would have scored zero runs ... RSA would have batted all 5 days and Amla would have been 1000 not out :P
KeyboardWarrior Posted February 3, 2013 Posted February 3, 2013 India would have scored zero runs ... RSA would have batted all 5 days and Amla would have been 1000 not out :P :hysterical:
Marut Posted February 4, 2013 Posted February 4, 2013 India would have scored zero runs ... RSA would have batted all 5 days and Amla would have been 1000 not out :P Poor Saffers. It is still a draw.:hysterical:
Sidhoni Posted February 4, 2013 Posted February 4, 2013 Tough to say..but we will still score 49+ :haha:
vayuu1 Posted February 4, 2013 Posted February 4, 2013 form is temporary' date='cr[b']ass is permanent:orderorder:Replace ass with the ape
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now