Jump to content

Has Shastry and Gavaskar ever involved in fixing?


Recommended Posts

Posted
What about all the proof given by evidences in Qayyum report and by bookies through the years ? Despite this' date=' PCB didnt want to take action against these players. Doesnt mean they were not guilty.[/quote'] bro read my post# 29.
Posted
Malik and Rehman were small fishes like Mongia' date=' Ajay Sharma, Prabhakar, and others etc. Azhar and Jadeja were far big fishes at that time.[/quote'] bro, Salim malik was the big fish too. check his stats and records in CI. and fixer is a fixer. no matter big or small. as i said innocent until proven guilty.
Posted

But But Wasim is Indian,because he love IPL & India more than Pak..... J/k On topic, those were just allegations,Wasim & co are innocent untill proven guilty.

Posted
But But Wasim is Indian,because he love IPL & India more than Pak..... J/k On topic, those were just allegations,Wasim & co are innocent untill proven guilty.
so is Azhar and Jadeja then.
Posted

If wasim and waqar and the others did not fix pakistan would have never lost a match in the 90s,, waqar and wasim both would have averaged 18-19 if they did not fix.

Posted
If wasim and waqar and the others did not fix pakistan would have never lost a match in the 90s' date=', waqar and wasim both would have averaged 18-19 if they did not fix.[/quote'] if azhar ,jadeja ,mongia/prabhakar & co had not fixed the matches Pak would have won even lesser matches & Waqar/Wasim would have averaged in low 30's :--D :finger:
Posted
bro, do you know where is justice kayyum now ? :hmmm: he is in self-imposed exile becoz of solid corruption cases on him. so his report means nothing now.
A judge having a charge of corruption does not mean that every former verdict of his means nothing. In that case, if a police officer is charged of some crime today, you would have release every criminal whose case was handled by the police officer.
Posted

I believe most Indian and Pakistani cricketers till the late '90s were heavily involved in fixing. It's near impossible to prove it now but it is what it is. They used to get peanuts compared to the players from other countries and there was easy money to be made without much risk at that time. They just took advantage of the situation.

Posted
i think i need to copy my post again for you brother. as i said his report means nothing now. Simple.
Being accused of corruption does not invalidate your previous works.
Posted
If wasim and waqar and the others did not fix pakistan would have never lost a match in the 90s' date=', waqar and wasim both would have averaged 18-19 if they did not fix.[/quote'] Err no, Pakistan would still have lost plenty of matches because Paki batsmen are FTBs. As for Waqar averaging 19...:haha::haha::haha::haha: The guy couldnt average under 25 against any decent batting lineup...ever. against Australia, England, South Africa, India- all the batting stalwart nations of that time, Waqar = Srinath. He looked like a demon against minnows like New Zealand, Bangladesh,Zimbabwe and a very depleted WI batting lineup.
Posted
A judge having a charge of corruption does not mean that every former verdict of his means nothing. In that case, if a police officer is charged of some crime today, you would have release every criminal whose case was handled by the police officer.
Being accused of corruption does not invalidate your previous works.
Brothers, what i didnt tell u in detail is that he is involved in some serious cases. he is not only involved in corruption charges but also involved giving false judgments which recently SC takes notice. Intelligence Bureau (IB), have some solid cases against him. becoz his judgments on 10 to 12 cases which includes "justice Qayyum report" is doubtful and without any solid proves and cannot prove guilty anyone in SC. becoz of that few months ago Salim Malik file appeal to HC against false verdict on him. so according to Intelligence Bureau (IB), this report means nothing included 10 to 12 cases.
Posted
Err no, Pakistan would still have lost plenty of matches because Paki batsmen are FTBs. As for Waqar averaging 19...:haha::haha::haha::haha: The guy couldnt average under 25 against any decent batting lineup...ever. against Australia, England, South Africa, India- all the batting stalwart nations of that time, Waqar = Srinath. He looked like a demon against minnows like New Zealand, Bangladesh,Zimbabwe and a very depleted WI batting lineup.
False check his stats before 1999. Anyway who cares match fixing is rampant in cricket, if there was no match fixing pakistan would never lose.
Posted
False check his stats before 1999. Anyway who cares match fixing is rampant in cricket, if there was no match fixing pakistan would never lose.
:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Pakistan would probably not be playing cricket if there was no match fixing :finger:
Posted
False check his stats before 1999. Anyway who cares match fixing is rampant in cricket, if there was no match fixing pakistan would never lose.
Pakistan would lose to teams like Australia & South Africa quite easily in the 90s because they were far better teams. As fo Waqar's stats before 1999, he still qualifies as a minnow basher who had mediocre stats agianst the better batting lineups.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...