adi B Posted June 25, 2013 Posted June 25, 2013 Aahh.. the same kind of hatred over any tamilian... tired of this kind of sh*t... But one thing that can't be explained is how he epicly failed when he selected the sqaud that was the No.1 Test side and won the World Cup. u sir have to change ur "nazariya"
maniac Posted June 25, 2013 Posted June 25, 2013 somebody called him an indian 'legend" here :haha: Dude don't know if you were around watching cricket in the 80's and 90's but he was a crowd puller....He was our very own Boom Boom :giggle: Played crucial role in 83 WC final and 85 World Championship, Captained India and succesfully drew in Pakistan of all places. So yes he is an Indian Legend
vvvslaxman Posted June 25, 2013 Posted June 25, 2013 Dude don't know if you were around watching cricket in the 80's and 90's but he was a crowd puller....He was our very own Boom Boom :giggle: Played crucial role in 83 WC final and 85 World Championship, Captained India and succesfully drew in Pakistan of all places. So yes he is an Indian Legend Richie Benaud's favorite player Cheeka was.. Don't think we can look at his averages and conclude he is an average player. The audacity with which he took on some of the pacers of his era was really special. The first even Loin Basher :cantstop: > Asantha De Mel will never forget him. http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/averages/batting_bowling_by_team.html?id=564;team=6;type=series
fineleg Posted June 25, 2013 Posted June 25, 2013 As a batsman, he was very unorthodox but daring batsman. He was certainly well regarded for his daring and unorthodox strokeplay during 1980s or part of 90s. Opposition captains including Aussies, Paks, Eng, WI used to fret over field placements for K. Srikkanth since he used to smash bowlers in unique (and ungainly) strokeplay. Much like how Greatbatch did later, and MSD sometimes does today. Sehwag is today and we have others. Not comparing Sehwag stats, but that type of brash play back then was a rarity. Explosive and Unpredictable batsman [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AE4HNu1n1wI]Krishnamachari SRIKKANTH 60 & Sachin TENDULKAR 57* Vs WI at MCG B&H WSC 1992 - YouTube[/ame] [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVO89pl1lP4]Kris Srikkanth 116 vs Australia 3rd test SCG 1985/86 - YouTube[/ame]
vvvslaxman Posted June 25, 2013 Posted June 25, 2013 As a batsman, he was very unorthodox but daring batsman. He was certainly well regarded for his daring and unorthodox strokeplay during 1980s or part of 90s. Opposition captains including Aussies, Paks, Eng, WI used to fret over field placements for K. Srikkanth since he used to smash bowlers in unique (and ungainly) strokeplay. Much like how Greatbatch did later, and MSD sometimes does today. Sehwag is today and we have others. Not comparing Sehwag stats, but that type of brash play back then was a rarity. Krishnamachari SRIKKANTH 60 & Sachin TENDULKAR 57* Vs WI at MCG B&H WSC 1992 - YouTube Yup.. no bouncer restrictions as well.
fineleg Posted June 25, 2013 Posted June 25, 2013 Yup.. no bouncer restrictions as well. Yes, He deserves criticism for some stupid stuff he does today, but that does not take away from his achievement as an unorthodox successful opener for India.
MCcricket Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 He averages only 29 in both formats and that is very very poor, Patil, Vishwanath, Amarnath were good players in the era and he was poor or maybe he had a jack to be in the team for that long.
vvvslaxman Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 He averages only 29 in both formats and that is very very poor' date=' Patil, Vishwanath, Amarnath were good players in the era and he was poor or maybe he had a jack to be in the team for that long.[/quote'] Opening in that era was a different cup of tea. Among all the tried ones to partner Sunny, Srikkanth was the best until the fateful Pakistan series where he developed a mental block after he was knocked down by Akram. Sidhu took over from there. Shastri was just a temporary option. Sunny many times told Srikkanth made his job much easier in the 80s. Also he was a good fielder and could roll his arm over when needed.
jalebi_bhai Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 I think his retarded demeanor nowadays makes people take him less seriously than they should......he is definitely one of India's batting greats......needs to down the moron gimmick though......
vvvslaxman Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 I think his retarded demeanor nowadays makes people take him less seriously than they should......he is definitely one of India's batting greats......needs to down the moron gimmick though...... Srikkanth was given commentary opportunity much like how Shastri, Arunlal, L Siva were given. But he was horrible much like Bishen Singh bedi. He lacks humility that is the problem.
bulbul Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 I think his retarded demeanor nowadays makes people take him less seriously than they should......he is definitely one of India's batting greats......needs to down the moron gimmick though...... He is good not great.
Asim Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 toFIXXkpgMo & when he used to 'perform' in field... LEGEND :cantstop:
jalebi_bhai Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 Srikkanth was given commentary opportunity much like how Shastri' date=' Arunlal, L Siva were given. But he was horrible much like Bishen Singh bedi. He lacks humility that is the problem.[/quote'] I agree......tends to act way too OTT..... He stepped up for us in some big tournaments......was one of our earliest impact players......easily in the top 15 ODI batsmen we have ever produced.....I'd consider him a great.....again......don't judge him purely on stats......
yoda Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 He is Jackass, top 15 ODI player of all time, took India to it's darkest days, selected Indian team which won the WC/selected team which went to #1 ranking in tests, can't stand him, one of the best...sounds like a dickens novel - it was the best of times, it was the worst of times
Sean Bradley Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 Aahh.. the same kind of hatred over any tamilian... tired of this kind of sh*t... But one thing that can't be explained is how he epicly failed when he selected the sqaud that was the No.1 Test side and won the World Cup. So we have our own version of "everybody hates us" here, and yes, to ans your question, Tamil Nadu has never been a recognized source of talent for Indian Cricket, It was Mumbai earlier, Its Delhi & neighboring smalls towns written all over now, R Ashwin is the only Tamil cric who has it to make it big.
Rocky Balboa Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 Srikkanth was given commentary opportunity much like how Shastri' date=' Arunlal, L Siva were given. But he was horrible much like Bishen Singh bedi. He lacks humility that is the problem.[/quote'] he pissed of saurav and called him 14th man during 2003 world cup. One Tamil friend told me that he made fun of sourav ganguly on Tamil channels. I think he infamously said that sourav was waiting like a dog to pounce on anything outside off side and he has no game on leg side. :hysterical:
FischerTal Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 boss just stop it okay just stop :giggle: thats all i remember of him
StatsRock Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 I have long been a trenchant critic of Srikkanth as a Test opener. However recently a friend showed me the stats as to how terrible we are in producing opening bats that I am now much more lenient to Srikkanth's career figures. Here is the performance of opening bats from 1980 to 2000. Who among this list would you have chosen to replace Srikkanth in the period 1985-1992? http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?batting_positionmax1=2;batting_positionval1=batting_position;class=1;filter=advanced;orderby=batting_average;qualmin1=5;qualval1=matches;size=100;spanmax1=31+Dec+1999;spanmin1=1+Jan+1980;spanval1=span;team=6;template=results;type=batting The only contemporaries are Gaekwad, Arun Lal and Raman and they all sucked even worse than Srikkanth(29.88) Gaekwad 28.90 Arun Lal 26.03 Raman 24.69 Most Indian fans would reckon Mongia, Laxman and Jadeja to be better bats from Srikkanth but they too sucked when opening. Mongia 27.29 Jadeja 29.33 Laxman 24.63 The truth is that the 1980s saw Indian domestics see regularly scores of 650-750 with #8s and #9s scoring hundreds. Just check the Duleep Trophy scores if you have a doubt. The likes of Carlton Saldanha, Lalchand Rajput scored big time against Bharat 'Dennis' Arun, Raju 'Curtley' Kulkarni, Rajinder 'Jeff' Ghai, etc. Saldanha's name was thrown about so freely in the 80s as the guy whose career was being blocked by Srikkanth. But this is what Saldanha came up with when given a chance against visiting teams: v Aus 1986 : 21 (McDermott/Davis/Gilbert/S Waugh) out of 208 v SL 1986 : 70 (Labrooy/De Mel/Anurasiri). Heck, even B.Arun hit 107 here v Pak 1987: 1 (Akram/Zakir Khan/Tauseef) out of 281. Pak scored 674-5. Other than Manjrekar(128), rest of the Ranji Bradmans crapped against this pop-gun Pak attack. v WI 1987: 6 (Patterson/Davis/Walsh) 73-7 in response to WI 550. Srikkanth atleast had 2 50s on a greentop v Patterson/Walsh, 50s against Imran/Akram, 3 50s against Hadlee, 4 50+s against McDermott/Reid/Hughes, 1 against Botham/Dilley. I am not sure if the Lambas/Saldanhas/Arun Lals are equally capable.
Rocky Balboa Posted June 26, 2013 Posted June 26, 2013 @statsrock, good analysis. You should post more....
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now