Asim Posted October 29, 2013 Posted October 29, 2013 RSS joint general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale said on Saturday that Hindu families should adopt a three-child norm to prevent "demographic imbalance" in society. Addressing the media during the ongoing RSS national executive here, Hosabale said a "demographic shift" has been taking place due to conversion, decline in birth rate and largescale infiltration from Bangladeshis. Bigger Hindu families would prevent minorities from gaining the upper hand in terms of population in certain parts of the country, he said. Stating that family planning should not be made applicable to any particular community he said "demographic balance" is necessary for balanced development. The growth rate of children in the age group of 0-6 years was 15 per cent among Hindus and 18 per cent among Muslim , claimed Hosabale, adding that "elite Hindus" should seriously review family planning. "We do not have enough youth to join the Armed Forces due to the present one-child norm,'' he said. http://www.indianexpress.com/news/to-prevent-population-imbalance-hindus-must-hav.../1187738/
Detonator Posted October 29, 2013 Posted October 29, 2013 :hysterical: although getting more children is a weapon for minorities for many years. race to become majority minority :giggle:
diga Posted October 29, 2013 Posted October 29, 2013 Instead, why cant we have everyone follow family planning ?
Detonator Posted October 29, 2013 Posted October 29, 2013 Instead' date=' why cant we have everyone follow family planning ?[/quote'] We should follow reservations on that. Idea for Family planning age cutoff: Hindu FC - 30 yrs Hindu BC - 30 yrs 1 month Hindu MBC - 30 yrs 11 months Christians/Muslims - 52 yrs SC/ST - 61 yrs Minorities need to get more children to look after themselves as there is no one to look after themselves.
Prakat Posted October 29, 2013 Posted October 29, 2013 Free-floating hate speech from Detonator. Amazing how warped his "reality" is.
randomGuy Posted October 29, 2013 Posted October 29, 2013 Instead' date=' why cant we have everyone follow family planning ?[/quote'] Regarding Muslim fertility, We should study Bangladesh's case if the fertility rate they officially show is indeed correct.
coffee_rules Posted October 29, 2013 Posted October 29, 2013 I feel "elite" Hindus rather "adopt" the third child rather than give birth or through surrogacy.
Detonator Posted October 29, 2013 Posted October 29, 2013 Free-floating hate speech from Detonator. Amazing how warped his "reality" is. reality is pretty un-realistic sometimes.
Crookbond Posted October 29, 2013 Posted October 29, 2013 reality is pretty un-realistic sometimes. Sounds straight from Rahul Gandhi's speech!
Detonator Posted October 29, 2013 Posted October 29, 2013 Sounds straight from Rahul Gandhi's speech! :hysterical: he inspires millions :hatsoff:
Ghost Buster Posted October 29, 2013 Posted October 29, 2013 I have decided not to burden this country more. So no marriage no kids, hope someothers follow my footsteps.
AGHORI Posted October 29, 2013 Posted October 29, 2013 Look at our sex ratio,how can we produce kids without enough women.There are more chances us becoming homosexuals
randomGuy Posted October 29, 2013 Posted October 29, 2013 I feel "elite" Hindus rather "adopt" the third child rather than give birth or through surrogacy. Population growth rate aside, Adoption is a very good and a noble option. This way, a poor child will get a good upbringing. In my workplace, both my manager and manager's manager had adopted a child (at different times). One of them had 1 biological child and the other didn't have biological child. Fertility rates in 2001 Think there's some error, TFR for India was 3+ in 2001 and ~2.57 in 2011 census.
diga Posted October 29, 2013 Posted October 29, 2013 Think there's some error, TFR for India was 3+ in 2001 and ~2.57 in 2011 census. you are right... Google data comparing fertility rates of Ind/Pak/Bangladesh/China/US from 1955 to 2011 ps: BTW, thats a nice google tool
Recommended Posts