Steyn doesn't have an inswinger?

[Zanjeer]

Well, our batsmen left well whenever he bowled around 4th 5th stumps, why can't he slip in an in swinger? Can't believe such a world class bowler doesn't have an in swinger. Lol...☺

[King Tendulkar]

True that

[panther]

Why couldn't he reverse the ball back in?

[Old guy]

He keeps things simple ..its just one bad match maybe having in swinger would be better but if its not natural it won't be really effective as people can read it easily

[King Tendulkar]

He does not even need inswinger. Just one that goes staright on but cant do it. Suprising outswingers galore work against team like paks but when up against superior indians he needs more

[Cricketics]

Even if he doesn't have it, still the best in the world. Just goes on to show how good he is and how hard it is to face him even though his line can be predictable to the batsman. It's a whole different game when the batsman is standing in front of him and judging him on a tv screen. CLASS BOWLER. Even today troubled Pujara and Kohli both a bit and was bowling with great passion even though he might be giving away some runs. That's the attitude you want to have from your main bowler.

[Brainfade]

Philander says: "Don't be fooled. I think this wicket is pretty slow and they've obviously had time to adjust and get in," he said. "If it had to be a quicker wicket like we had in the ODI game it would be a totally different ball game." Sure. Wouldn't our heads explode if we got bundled out for 150 and one of our guys says "Don't be fooled. I think this wicket is really fast and bouncy, and their bowlers adjusted well. If it had been a flatter wicket like we had at the Chinnaswamy, it would be totally different ball game." Suck it up and bowl, Vernon. Added in edit: Oops, didn't see the other thread dedicated to bashing Vernon's excuses :)

[Lord]

He has it but BCCI banned it from this series:--D QYAH-fj0_ac

[Pagalpanti]

I remember him setting up Bell beautifully. But for some reason he doesn't bowl a lot of in-swinging deliveries. ^ You beat me to it.

[SLICKR392]

Was watching few vids. There is one to Trott as well. Very rarely bowls them.

[KeyboardWarrior]

i knew it .... its not surprise at all.

[Lord]

Was watching few vids. There is one to Trott as well. Very rarely bowls them.

I think he must have bowled it today too but because they played solidly we dont notice. its not as if he was bowling all outswingers,surely not

[zep1706]

I remember he bowled a few in Nagpur a few years ago. It was just one of those days.

[youngindia]

I remember he bowled a few in Nagpur a few years ago

one to Vijay and a few others by reverse

[rkt.india]

I remember him setting up Bell beautifully. But for some reason he doesn't bowl a lot of in-swinging deliveries. ^ You beat me to it.

He certainly did but our batsmen handled well. He does not have a big inswing like Anderson though.

[vvvslaxman]

This guy is goat material. Despite being one he is bound to have off days. We cannot start questioning his weaknesses based on one test. Great bowler. He will come back harder.

[Old guy]

This guy is goat material. Despite being one he is bound to have off days. We cannot start questioning his weaknesses based on one test. Great bowler. He will come back harder.

Yeah...he might blow us away in next test but these things happen just need to play with correct technique to give us maximum chance One thing I know is Pakistan would have edged the ball and probably got 5 down in first session yesterday itself while we fought hard and are lucky that best 2 batsmen we have came good ..still think rest will struggle

[Deleted_User_1]

This guy is goat material. Despite being one he is bound to have off days. We cannot start questioning his weaknesses based on one test. Great bowler. He will come back harder.

+1 Every one, even god, has bad days!

[Gunner]

With an outswinger that good, you don't need an inswinger.

[Sidhoni]

Ofcourse he doesn't.