express bowling Posted August 19, 2018 Author Share Posted August 19, 2018 Need to wrap it up now. Can't let them add 50 runs or more. Suhaan and Mosher 1 1 Link to comment
Suhaan Posted August 19, 2018 Share Posted August 19, 2018 9 minutes ago, R!TTER said: He isn't any worse than Shami, in these conditions. Unless you have evidence to prove that? You dont need to be smart to look beyond Umesh.. but still if you are looking for evidence search using the keyword "bowling average" of the two express bowling 1 Link to comment
R!TTER Posted August 19, 2018 Share Posted August 19, 2018 Just now, Suhaan said: You dont need to be smart to look beyond Umesh.. but still if you are looking for evidence search using the keyword "bowling average" of the two Do yourself a favor and start searching for avg in these conditions, I'm not gonna do that for you. Link to comment
express bowling Posted August 19, 2018 Author Share Posted August 19, 2018 Bumrah almost gets Anderson with a rising short ball at the ribs. Mosher 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted August 19, 2018 Share Posted August 19, 2018 25 minutes ago, Pollack said: Man, you just debate for the sake of it. 6-8m is good length and 7m-8m is considered back/short of a good length. Most balls in the pitch map are closer to 8m in-between 7m bad 8m. Only few are between 6m and 7m. Please just don't argue just for the sake of it. He has bowled short of a good length. If 6-8 is good length then how is 7-8 meter is back of length? Back of length is just over 8 meter. Back of length means back of good length. Link to comment
express bowling Posted August 19, 2018 Author Share Posted August 19, 2018 Bumrah gets Butler with a short ball. His 2nd wicket. England all out for 161. Mosher and Suhaan 1 1 Link to comment
Suhaan Posted August 19, 2018 Share Posted August 19, 2018 5 minutes ago, R!TTER said: Do yourself a favor and start searching for avg in these conditions, I'm not gonna do that for you. You cant do it,anyway Link to comment
express bowling Posted August 19, 2018 Author Share Posted August 19, 2018 All wickets taken by fast bowlers Pandya 5 Bumrah 2 Ishant 2 Shami 1 Mosher, Adi BB, SandeepMotta and 2 others 1 4 Link to comment
Pollack Posted August 19, 2018 Share Posted August 19, 2018 1 minute ago, rkt.india said: If 6-8 is good length then how is 7-8 meter is back of length? Back of length is just over 8 meter. Back of length means back of good length. Short of a good length is 7m to 8m which is also called back of a length. Over 8m is short. I am sorry this is how it is. You can have your own version. Link to comment
Suhaan Posted August 19, 2018 Share Posted August 19, 2018 (edited) Bumrah's return has done a world of good to our attack,no wonder we should consider him as the leader of the pack across formats Edited August 19, 2018 by Suhaan raki05 and express bowling 1 1 Link to comment
R!TTER Posted August 19, 2018 Share Posted August 19, 2018 Just now, Suhaan said: You cant do it,anyway I don't need to, but apparently a lot of posters here need explanation on what's being said or the context under which something has been posted. If you're so eager to butt in someone else's debate - do your homework, I'm not doing it for you. Link to comment
express bowling Posted August 19, 2018 Author Share Posted August 19, 2018 (edited) 3rd test 1st innings ... some genuine fast bowling from 3 of our 4 pacers Bumrah Fastest 145 k Average 140 k Pandya Fastest 145 k Average 138 k Shami Fastest 144 k Average 139 k Ishant Fastest 141 k Average 135 k From : BCCI.tv Edited August 19, 2018 by express bowling S_pace, Adi BB, Vilander and 4 others 2 5 Link to comment
Pollack Posted August 19, 2018 Share Posted August 19, 2018 9 minutes ago, rkt.india said: If 6-8 is good length then how is 7-8 meter is back of length? Back of length is just over 8 meter. Back of length means back of good length. Back of length = Back of a good length = Back end of a good length = short of a good length = Short end of a good length. speedheat 1 Link to comment
Suhaan Posted August 19, 2018 Share Posted August 19, 2018 9 minutes ago, R!TTER said: I don't need to, but apparently a lot of posters here need explanation on what's being said or the context under which something has been posted. If you're so eager to butt in someone else's debate - do your homework, I'm not doing it for you. Ok where did you find written where it says a third poster cannot have his /her opinion when there is already a debate in progress?....I didn't find any before I joined ICF.. express bowling 1 Link to comment
GautiMaan Posted August 19, 2018 Share Posted August 19, 2018 10 minutes ago, express bowling said: 3rd test 1st innings Bumrah Fastest 145 k Average 140 k Pandya Fastest 145 k Average 138 k Shami Fastest 144 k Average 139 k Ishant Fastest 141 k Average 135 k From : BCCI.tv It would be interesting to compare this to the last test,where we had only 3 seamers I'm pretty sure when there are four of them to share the load,the intensity of each one goes up.It is also why the 4 bowler theory never worked for us in the past overseas Vilander, express bowling, Adi BB and 1 other 4 Link to comment
express bowling Posted August 19, 2018 Author Share Posted August 19, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, GautiMaan said: It would be interesting to compare this to the last test,where we had only 3 seamers Shami and Ishant have bowled similar speeds but Pandya has bowled much quicker in this game. Quote I'm pretty sure when there are four of them to share the load,the intensity of each one goes up.It is also why the 4 bowler theory never worked for us in the past overseas Very true. The intensity is much higher when we have 4 fast bowlers bowling out of Asia and sharing the workload. Edited August 19, 2018 by express bowling Vilander, Suhaan and Mosher 1 2 Link to comment
express bowling Posted August 19, 2018 Author Share Posted August 19, 2018 The English medium pacers going at 7 runs per over in their first 4 overs. Mosher and Suhaan 1 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted August 19, 2018 Share Posted August 19, 2018 41 minutes ago, Pollack said: Short of a good length is 7m to 8m which is also called back of a length. Over 8m is short. I am sorry this is how it is. You can have your own version. 6-8 is good length, anything shorter than that is short of good length. Short is around meter. Link to comment
speedheat Posted August 19, 2018 Share Posted August 19, 2018 38 minutes ago, Pollack said: Back of length = Back of a good length = Back end of a good length = short of a good length = Short end of a good length. This could help! 6-8m is good length.. express bowling 1 Link to comment
tweaker Posted August 19, 2018 Share Posted August 19, 2018 (edited) Duplicate post Edited August 19, 2018 by tweaker Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now