CSK Fan Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 players who are not picked for playing is always better than the current players .. #wheelchairlogic No one put Pankaj over Aaron or Yadav so dunno what you are talking about
GautiMaan Posted August 7, 2014 Author Posted August 7, 2014 players who are not picked for playing is always better than the current players .. #wheelchairlogic How are Aaron and Ashwin doing well then? sub hundred score and cook 50 if we had persisted with same side.
jusarrived Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 No one put Pankaj over Aaron or Yadav so dunno what you are talking about you forgot Ishant . I have read here that Dhoni runined his career by not picking him early
CSK Fan Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 you forgot Ishant . I have read here that Dhoni runined his career by not picking him early He should be given equal chances as Ishant to judge. Give him 60 tests and he will take a 5-fer too
velu Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 No one put Pankaj over Aaron or Yadav so dunno what you are talking about my statement sounds like a generic one to me ..
velu Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 you forgot Ishant . I have read here that Dhoni runined his career by not picking him early that god he picked shami .. otherwise the same wheelchair walas will be whining abt dhoni not picking shami ..
maniac Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 Once again It is obvious to see-You just know when you look at a player if he has the tools to make it or not. Again it is not Phaaaast bowling fanaticsm. You look at Bhuvi who is a 125-130 K bowler but you still know he has the skills to cut it at the international level. Pankaj Singh is just too ordinary and it is very very obvious.
velu Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 ^^^ but after pankajs 1st innings in the last test , many were saying he bowled really well but unlucky ..
vishalvirsingh Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 Pankaj is ideal to play for rajasthan. .. Sorry not for India.
maniac Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 ^^^ but after pankajs 1st innings in the last test , many were saying he bowled really well but unlucky .. No they were just cheering for him for all his efforts in domestics....I get it...You need a payoff for your consistent hardwork but the sad fact that he is just not international material
Crookbond Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 No they were just cheering for him for all his efforts in domestics....I get it...You need a payoff for your consistent hardwork but the sad fact that he is just not international material The commentators on CI, Sky Sports and Star Sports definitely are't cheer leaders.
Lord Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 ^^^ but after pankajs 1st innings in the last test , many were saying he bowled really well but unlucky .. he should have got 2 atleast there on first day.both when batsmen were new
maniac Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 The commentators on CI' date=' Sky Sports and Star Sports definitely are't cheer leaders.[/quote'] Cmon man,Did you see the game,Lets not even compare with Broad,Anderson,but the Guy was huffing-Puffing after every over,Most unthreatening bowler on either sides,. Bowling 1 or 2 peaches and create chances is not a big deal,Even Parttimers over long spells will create chances or bowl such deliveries,You assess their ability to bowl threatening spells or at-least a minimum of one threatening over. Don't see it in him.
asterix Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 Is saley ko shyte karney ke liye yehi series mila tha? :wall:
ThePhenomenal1 Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 Hmmm .. hmmmm I have backed him. He looked good before! Had all the tools. But no wicket taking ability. Has not been able to get a single wicket. Maybe he just needs the 1 wicket to set him off. We shall see.
Crookbond Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 Cmon man,Did you see the game,Lets not even compare with Broad,Anderson,but the Guy was huffing-Puffing after every over,Most unthreatening bowler on either sides,. Bowling 1 or 2 peaches and create chances is not a big deal,Even Parttimers over long spells will create chances or bowl such deliveries,You assess their ability to bowl threatening spells or at-least a minimum of one threatening over. Don't see it in him. Pankaj Singh did more than that.
Utalk Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 New pace sensation must be Indian response to Melcom Sami.
Lord Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 he bowled better than Shami last match which is why he was retained.Here too created 2-3 chances.Hopefully gets his rewards soon
Lord Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 New pace sensation must be Indian response to Melcom Sami. is that Lords scorecard in your av :P
sensible-indian Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 I never understood this deal with Pankaj so I started paying real close attention to his overs. A typical over would like this: Outside off - no threat - well left Beautiful delivery - a bit of oohs - not out Outside off - no threat - well left Wide ball - Cut for 4 Above decent delivery - gets some praise from commies - well left - not out Full length - Driven for 4 8 runs. Variations of this is happening every over.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now