Shivaji bhonsle Posted July 14, 2015 Posted July 14, 2015 Can players play for other franchicies? I mean the likes of Raina, Faf, Dhoni, Nehra, Bravo, Watson, Rahane etc. are top players in T20's. Why should they suffer for deeds of others? Players can play for other franchises.
Austin 3:!6 Posted July 14, 2015 Posted July 14, 2015 Players can play for other franchises. Great. Eager to see MS Dhoni playing for KKR. Always wanted him to play for KKR. He is from East Zone after all. If he would have played under ShahRukh Khan since the inception of IPL, all these scandals would not have come. MSD might not have been a power maniac now either.
G_B_ Posted July 14, 2015 Posted July 14, 2015 @mods: merge this thread too http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?t=327420 done
Malcolm Merlyn Posted July 14, 2015 Author Posted July 14, 2015 This is binding but i guess both will move the supreme court challenging this.In case they lose i guess they will sell the franchise and leave.
Precambrian Posted July 14, 2015 Posted July 14, 2015 Guys, CSK and RR can still compete provided these owners relinquish their stakes Maama will simbly transfer the shares to some of his benamis.
bowl_out Posted July 14, 2015 Posted July 14, 2015 India Cements and Jaipur IPL franchisee suspended for 2 years, not CSK and RR... Excerpt from Cricinfo: The teams themselves are not suspended. it is just the owners who cannot run a team for the next two years. So perhaps if CSK and RR are bought out by other entities, they might be able to play. That hinges on the India Cements and Jaipur IPL Ltd's willingness to relinquish their ownership Can the owners transfer the franchisee to a benami and continue to have the teams play under their dotted ownership?
Malcolm Merlyn Posted July 14, 2015 Author Posted July 14, 2015 India Cements and Jaipur IPL franchisee suspended for 2 years, not CSK and RR... Excerpt from Cricinfo: The teams themselves are not suspended. it is just the owners who cannot run a team for the next two years. So perhaps if CSK and RR are bought out by other entities, they might be able to play. That hinges on the India Cements and Jaipur IPL Ltd's willingness to relinquish their ownership Can the owners transfer the franchisee to a benami and continue to have the teams play under their dotted ownership? Benami under the eyes of supreme court.Lol
zakk Posted July 14, 2015 Posted July 14, 2015 Benami under the eyes of supreme court.Lol means chances nahi hai kya :hmmm:
bowl_out Posted July 14, 2015 Posted July 14, 2015 Benami under the eyes of supreme court.Lol Or some 'X' company that IC have indirect control over
zep1706 Posted July 14, 2015 Posted July 14, 2015 so this is like a non binding opinion or? Final and binding AFAIK.
Detonator Posted July 14, 2015 Posted July 14, 2015 why ban for 2 yrs.. should have permanently banned.. this way the players won't be affected in long term
Malcolm Merlyn Posted July 14, 2015 Author Posted July 14, 2015 means chances nahi hai kya :hmmm: Or some 'X' company that IC have indirect control over With SC monitoring this they cant do any hanky panky or else join Sahara in Tihar jail.
gattaca Posted July 14, 2015 Posted July 14, 2015 Best news of the day. This way dhoni is cutoff from his umbilical cord. No more csk players in Odis.
sscomp32 Posted July 14, 2015 Posted July 14, 2015 Best news of the day. This way dhoni is cutoff from his umbilical cord. No more csk players in Odis. No Raina in ODIs? :blink: ICF is sometimes hilarious
cowboysfan Posted July 14, 2015 Posted July 14, 2015 people should stop watching this sham. this has caused terrible damage to talent production in india.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now