Texy Posted August 2, 2015 Share Posted August 2, 2015 3Mf1eksUtzY Wow who's this journalist. Felt good watching this video. :hatsoff: Talking about Shruti Seth. Here is one more imbecilic tweet of her. https://scontent-hkg3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/11800595_928065160593928_3654266266591186807_n.jpg?oh=3f660bf8c997e2f1fec096b292a4d406&oe=56400757 Isn't Shruti Seth married to a Muslim. Just another dumb bimbo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seedhi Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Disappointing but expected reaction. When a particular community is being targeted or perceived to be targeted, such reactions are inevitable and have the potential to become more dangerous if the root causes are not addressed. State assemblies pass resolutions and come out in support of other terrorists, but no state assembly does that for Muslim terrorists. The reaction if Jammu and Kashmir assembly had done a similar thing for Afzal Guru as was done by TN and Punjab is imaginable. Going by recent executions, the rarest of rare doctrine seems reserved for Muslim terrorists. No Hindu has been brought to the book for the '84 riots against Sikhs. None of the BJP, RSS, and VHP leaders responsible for the '92 demolition of Babri Masjid have been punished. On the contrary, the likes of Advani and Uma Bharti have slyly had the charge of criminal conspiracy dropped. Why are these cases nowhere near resolution 23 years later?Because there is ZERO evidence. The Liberian Commission produced a report which was completely devoid of any evidence for its conclusions. As for the 1984 riots, you can blame the secular Congress for inaction on prosecuting the crimes. Which Shiv Sena leader has been punished for the Bombay riots despite the Srikrishna report implicating several, including Bal Thackeray who was given a state funeral?Again, there is zero evidence which will hold in the court. None of the cases against Hindu terrorists involved in Ajmer, Malegaon etc. are going anywhere. Witnesses regularly turn hostile, while there are numerous cases of innocent Muslims being framed and languishing in jail for years before being exonerated - some signed off on by our current PM.Again, because of lack of evidence. The secular Congress was in power for more than 5 years since 2008 both in the Centre and in Maharashtra, and yet these cases have not moved forward, and the accused have been languishing in jail without even the trial starting. By design or chance, it's near impossible to deny that the current judicial system is working in a biased manner.How many Kashmiri muslims were prosecuted for the massacre and ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Pandits in 1989-90? People who are well known to have directed the massacres are walking free in Kashmir. It is time to fix it before too late. All this talk of economic growth and modernization will mean nothing if in parallel the country ends up alienating 15% of its population.How about fixing the Constitution to have uniform laws and rights for all citizens regardless of religion? But the bizarro "secularism" practiced in India regards the Uniform Civil Code as un-secular. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedFever Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Disappointing but expected reaction. When a particular community is being targeted or perceived to be targeted, such reactions are inevitable and have the potential to become more dangerous if the root causes are not addressed. State assemblies pass resolutions and come out in support of other terrorists, but no state assembly does that for Muslim terrorists. The reaction if Jammu and Kashmir assembly had done a similar thing for Afzal Guru as was done by TN and Punjab is imaginable. Going by recent executions, the rarest of rare doctrine seems reserved for Muslim terrorists. No Hindu has been brought to the book for the '84 riots against Sikhs. None of the BJP, RSS, and VHP leaders responsible for the '92 demolition of Babri Masjid have been punished. . Notice how conveniently this guy omits the word Congress leaders and replaces it with Hindus for the 84 riots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoda-esque Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Notice how conveniently this guy omits the word Congress leaders and replaces it with Hindus for the 84 riots. Ekach shabda ..YZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gattaca Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Disappointing but expected reaction. When a particular community is being targeted or perceived to be targeted, such reactions are inevitable and have the potential to become more dangerous if the root causes are not addressed. State assemblies pass resolutions and come out in support of other terrorists, but no state assembly does that for Muslim terrorists. The reaction if Jammu and Kashmir assembly had done a similar thing for Afzal Guru as was done by TN and Punjab is imaginable. Going by recent executions, the rarest of rare doctrine seems reserved for Muslim terrorists. No Hindu has been brought to the book for the '84 riots against Sikhs. None of the BJP, RSS, and VHP leaders responsible for the '92 demolition of Babri Masjid have been punished. On the contrary, the likes of Advani and Uma Bharti have slyly had the charge of criminal conspiracy dropped. Why are these cases nowhere near resolution 23 years later? Which Shiv Sena leader has been punished for the Bombay riots despite the Srikrishna report implicating several, including Bal Thackeray who was given a state funeral? The few high profile Hindu convictions that did happen in the '02 riots are currently out on bail, while Afzal Guru's last remains were not returned to the family and Yakub Memon was not allowed to meet his mother as his last wish. None of the cases against Hindu terrorists involved in Ajmer, Malegaon etc. are going anywhere. Witnesses regularly turn hostile, while there are numerous cases of innocent Muslims being framed and languishing in jail for years before being exonerated - some signed off on by our current PM. By design or chance, it's near impossible to deny that the current judicial system is working in a biased manner. It is time to fix it before too late. All this talk of economic growth and modernization will mean nothing if in parallel the country ends up alienating 15% of its population. I dont see any questions asked about godhra which was the trigger for gujarat riots. you can pick and choose the cases you like. But turning this in to Hindu vs Muslim is not good. Afzal and kasab were hanged during congress period. Were they anti Muslim as well ? Are we going to say Kasab shouldn't have been hanged ? When BJP does that it is Hindu vs Muslim. Stop following owasi he is corrupting people's minds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedFever Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Ekach shabda ..YZ haha :haha: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mishra Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Ekach shabda ..YZ Dont you know Hindu Terror is biiggest threat India is facing since Independence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
someone Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 This was done simply to save a terrorist in disguise of death penalty abolition campaign. Had that succeeded, some time later, these group would have demanded him to be pardoned and ultimately, be released from jail. So, his execution has finished this case once for all instead of him being a liability and vote bank issue for a lifetime. A religion is used as evidence for their innocence and basically, to play the victim card. So if one are from a particular religion, that's an automatic innocent certificate. The reactions that now Hindus "deserves" the same thing is a very violent thinking. It's not just about getting special treatment but also about them being the controller and judge . One user wrote a good point that all this development, modernization is nothing when 15% of population are terrorists sympathizers. That's enough to bring down a country. We ought to address the root cause and call a spade a spade. Europe is a good example of what happens when you start ignoring the root cause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diga Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 they have special laws.. yet they want no laws applicable to them. they carved out a country ... yet they want more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
someone Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 they talk secularism, yet don't practice it. Women don't have equal and basic rights. They need to first solve their own women rights in their religion . So, unsurprising not to see any women in those pictures. And then they want Sharia law once in majority... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diga Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Isn't Shruti Seth married to a Muslim. Just another dumb bimbo. am sure there are reasons to oppose death penalty, but thats one of the dumbest...are our so called p-secs/left intelligentsia/MSM opposed to BJP only because of this? :giggle: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amiret Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Notice how conveniently this guy omits the word Congress leaders and replaces it with Hindus for the 84 riots. Sajjan Kumar , HKL Bhagat , Kamal Nath , Dharam Das Shastri , Arjun Singh , Lalit Maken , Jagdish Tytler . Just because they belonged to Cong does not mean they stopped being Hindus . You seem to have convinced yourself that religion played no part in the brutal Slaughter of Sikhs , despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. The Congressis and the tens of thousands they incited to riot,r*pe and murder belonged to the majority religion.. Socio- Economic Studies done by the Sikh community AND Evidence produced before the nanavati Commission have shown that a vast majority of those participating in the brutal Genocide belonged to 1 Specific Religion and to certain castes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seedhi Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Sajjan Kumar , HKL Bhagat , Kamal Nath , Dharam Das Shastri , Arjun Singh , Lalit Maken , Jagdish Tytler . Just because they belonged to Cong does not mean they stopped being Hindus . You seem to have convinced yourself that religion played no part in the brutal Slaughter of Sikhs , despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. The Congressis and the tens of thousands they incited to riot,r*pe and murder belonged to the majority religion.. Socio- Economic Studies done by the Sikh community AND Evidence produced before the nanavati Commission have shown that a vast majority of those participating in the brutal Genocide belonged to 1 Specific Religion and to certain castes.That is most probably a function of the membership profile of the Congress at that time. Doesn't prove that religion had much to do with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dial_100 Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 All other cases are because of some political indifferences and they do not have on going motive to disintegrate the country. Our judiciary punishes all irrespective of religion. People like Asaram and god knows how many are behind bars. Having said that capital punishment is extremely rare in India. Rather than blaming majority, why cant this particular minority introspect and help us fix the problem. As a country, this separatist approach based on religion will disintegrate our country and that's why such very rare cases are chosen for capital punishment. It is difficult for this community to think beyond religion and that is the harsh reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dial_100 Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Ekach shabda ..YZ :hysterical: :hysterical: lai bhari Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texan Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Disappointing but expected reaction. When a particular community is being targeted or perceived to be targeted, such reactions are inevitable and have the potential to become more dangerous if the root causes are not addressed. State assemblies pass resolutions and come out in support of other terrorists, but no state assembly does that for Muslim terrorists. The reaction if Jammu and Kashmir assembly had done a similar thing for Afzal Guru as was done by TN and Punjab is imaginable. Going by recent executions, the rarest of rare doctrine seems reserved for Muslim terrorists. No Hindu has been brought to the book for the '84 riots against Sikhs. None of the BJP, RSS, and VHP leaders responsible for the '92 demolition of Babri Masjid have been punished. On the contrary, the likes of Advani and Uma Bharti have slyly had the charge of criminal conspiracy dropped. Why are these cases nowhere near resolution 23 years later? Which Shiv Sena leader has been punished for the Bombay riots despite the Srikrishna report implicating several, including Bal Thackeray who was given a state funeral? The few high profile Hindu convictions that did happen in the '02 riots are currently out on bail, while Afzal Guru's last remains were not returned to the family and Yakub Memon was not allowed to meet his mother as his last wish. None of the cases against Hindu terrorists involved in Ajmer, Malegaon etc. are going anywhere. Witnesses regularly turn hostile, while there are numerous cases of innocent Muslims being framed and languishing in jail for years before being exonerated - some signed off on by our current PM. By design or chance, it's near impossible to deny that the current judicial system is working in a biased manner. It is time to fix it before too late. All this talk of economic growth and modernization will mean nothing if in parallel the country ends up alienating 15% of its population. How did these terrorists suddenly acquire a religion again? What happened to - "Hey, these are not Muslims, they don't represent Islam...blah blah blah"? When they commit crimes, they don't seem to belong to any religion, but when they are punished for their crimes, they acquire their religion back again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adi B Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 How did these terrorists suddenly acquire a religion again? What happened to - "Hey, these are not Muslims, they don't represent Islam...blah blah blah"? When they commit crimes, they don't seem to belong to any religion, but when they are punished for their crimes, they acquire their religion back again? True Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shivaji bhonsle Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Sajjan Kumar , HKL Bhagat , Kamal Nath , Dharam Das Shastri , Arjun Singh , Lalit Maken , Jagdish Tytler . Just because they belonged to Cong does not mean they stopped being Hindus . You seem to have convinced yourself that religion played no part in the brutal Slaughter of Sikhs , despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. The Congressis and the tens of thousands they incited to riot,r*pe and murder belonged to the majority religion.. Socio- Economic Studies done by the Sikh community AND Evidence produced before the nanavati Commission have shown that a vast majority of those participating in the brutal Genocide belonged to 1 Specific Religion and to certain castes. . Its not a Hindu - Sikh riots. I live in Delhi. I have Sikh friends who tell me that the widows colony was attacked by Muslims, and valmiki people. Sikhs hate Congress for the riots, not Hindus. Rubbish as usual form you. Go ask any Sikh. You will get the answer whether they blame Congress or Hindus for the riots..!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zep1706 Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 How did these terrorists suddenly acquire a religion again? What happened to - "Hey, these are not Muslims, they don't represent Islam...blah blah blah"? When they commit crimes, they don't seem to belong to any religion, but when they are punished for their crimes, they acquire their religion back again? Ha ha it is quite ironic, isn't it? We are often told that a terrorist has no religion, can't be a Muslim etc. but when a terrorist gets convicted and hanged he suddenly becomes a shaheed. :haha: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amiret Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 . Its not a Hindu - Sikh riots. I live in Delhi. I have Sikh friends who tell me that the widows colony was attacked by Muslims, and valmiki people. Sikhs hate Congress for the riots, not Hindus. Rubbish as usual form you. Go ask any Sikh. You will get the answer whether they blame Congress or Hindus for the riots..!! Congress is not a religion and No Sikh is confused about the RELIGIOUS Identity of majority of the perpetrators of the 1984 genocide. Your imaginary conversations with your Sikh "friends" is a sad testimony to the self-delusion perpertuated by shameless historical revisionism of the Saffron brigade . For every true story of Atal Bihar Vajpayee and his RSS volunteers rescuing Sikhs ; there are 3000 other stories of members of the majority religion engaging in Riot , R**E and Murder. Many of those Crimes against humanity have been chronicled in the reports of the Nanawati commission , People's Union for Civil Liberties....etc . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts