Jump to content

KL Rahul injury status?


gakgupta

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know it's weird to start a thread for knowing the injury status.....

I searched everywhere, i couldn't find the article on this...so i thought i will start one...

How bad is that tear? How long does it take to heal? will he be fit before the next series?

Posted

I know it's weird to start a thread for knowing the injury status.....

I searched everywhere, i couldn't find the article on this...so i thought i will start one...

How bad is that tear? How long does it take to heal? will he be fit before the next series?

Posted

But ya it's surprising that he got injured so soon...I have a theory why certain players/athletes get injured eventhough they look fit..but i don't want to stir shit up...

Anyways, hoping he recovers on time for the next series. 

Posted
11 hours ago, Viper said:

2 months bhe nahi tik paya INTL cricket me. Gar me raho..

Way to encourage a young player who improved his game tremendously in the recent past and did well in almost every chance given to him, without wasting the team's and team supporters' time unlike a few others, giving a solid option to solve one of Indian team's problem areas ie. the opening slot in all formats.

 

But then, all of the above may not matter to you as it doesn't suit your agenda.

 

Posted

Most exciting non established talent in the world right now.

 

i am not wrong too often with identifying talent and with Rahul I will admit I was marginally wrong.

 

knew the kid had talent always to have a decent career,but thought he was missing that 'it' factor that would propel him to the world beater level but wrong on that front.

 

has it in him to make a big name on the world stage.

 

Yes approved and signed off on him

Posted
13 minutes ago, maniac said:

Most exciting non established talent in the world right now.

 

i am not wrong too often with identifying talent and with Rahul I will admit I was marginally wrong.

 

knew the kid had talent always to have a decent career,but thought he was missing that 'it' factor that would propel him to the world beater level but wrong on that front.

 

has it in him to make a big name on the world stage.

 

Yes approved and signed off on him

 

*cough* Rayudu *cough*

*cough* Sharma *cough*

*cough* Another Sharma *cough*

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, maniac said:

Most exciting non established talent in the world right now.

 

i am not wrong too often with identifying talent and with Rahul I will admit I was marginally wrong.

 

knew the kid had talent always to have a decent career,but thought he was missing that 'it' factor that would propel him to the world beater level but wrong on that front.

 

has it in him to make a big name on the world stage.

 

Yes approved and signed off on him

I beg you, please don't  :pray:

Posted
3 minutes ago, philcric said:

 

*cough* Rayudu *cough*

*cough* Sharma *cough*

*cough* Another Sharma *cough*

 

Oh boy I need to go on again but that's ok why to shy away from accomplishments 

 

here we go

An upcoming young all rounder was identified before he accomplished anything then went on to score one of the fastest test 200s, loads of 5 wicket hauls in tests and clutch 100s-Ben Stokes

 

a young leg spinner whose was classified as a hack became the worlds premier batsman and the much desired captaincy of the baggy green-Steve Smith

 

A guy who has 2 Loi 200s World record holder for most 6s in an innings,world record holder for the highest Odi score, man of the match in wc knockouts, clutch knock in t20 wcs....right now one of the the finest Loi batsman in the world-Rohit Sharma

 

A guy on the Lords honor board, Man of the match in ICC knockouts, 2 Mos one of them against a an ATG Aussie side and the other in a overseas series-Ishant Sharma

 

A batsman who averages 50 in Odis and one of the fastest to 1000 runs-A.Rayudu

 

guess what Rahul is the closest I come to jumping on the bandwagon even though he has not done much yet but I feel it and I see big things..it is still risky as there is a chance I can fall flat for the first time...take this one to the bank....this one is a keeper...he is good...real good

Posted
2 hours ago, maniac said:

 

An upcoming young all rounder was identified before he accomplished anything then went on to score one of the fastest test 200s, loads of 5 wicket hauls in tests and clutch 100s     -Ben Stokes

 

 

Ben Stokes has two  5 wicket hauls in  44 test innings with an average of  37.6 bowling half the time in swing-friendly England.

 

He has only  3 centuries from 25 tests at an average of 33.2

 

He surely has potential but has not been that consistent so far although he has played 25 tests.

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, maniac said:

Oh boy I need to go on again but that's ok why to shy away from accomplishments 

 

here we go

An upcoming young all rounder was identified before he accomplished anything then went on to score one of the fastest test 200s, loads of 5 wicket hauls in tests and clutch 100s-Ben Stokes

 

a young leg spinner whose was classified as a hack became the worlds premier batsman and the much desired captaincy of the baggy green-Steve Smith

 

A guy who has 2 Loi 200s World record holder for most 6s in an innings,world record holder for the highest Odi score, man of the match in wc knockouts, clutch knock in t20 wcs....right now one of the the finest Loi batsman in the world-Rohit Sharma

 

A guy on the Lords honor board, Man of the match in ICC knockouts, 2 Mos one of them against a an ATG Aussie side and the other in a overseas series-Ishant Sharma

 

A batsman who averages 50 in Odis and one of the fastest to 1000 runs-A.Rayudu

 

guess what Rahul is the closest I come to jumping on the bandwagon even though he has not done much yet but I feel it and I see big things..it is still risky as there is a chance I can fall flat for the first time...take this one to the bank....this one is a keeper...he is good...real good

Dude, my response was to this line of yours below ..

Quote

i am not wrong too often with identifying talent ..

That is true for almost every decent cricket fan. I mean anybody who watches cricket properly can kind of judge the players after their first few games and most times the players careers turn out that way. But they don't go on trumpeting 'I told you so' and 'Cricket Acumen 101' BS. It's juvenile.

 

You also don't agree when you get it wrong. Unreasonable excuses, bizarre/tangential arguments, trolling ... that's what you resort to.

 

Ben Stokes - Almost everyone (including Aussie commentators) thought he had great potential after watching his 1st game. 

 

Steven Smith - I'll give this to you (if you show us a post of yours backing him as a batsman before be became successful). I don't think many thought he would be a successful batter.

 

Rohit Sharma (Tests) - So far he has failed. And didn't show enough signs that he'd be a very good test batsman. But you won't accept. You give bizarre excuses. You want the team to keep playing him, and when he gets a half-decent score you want to gloat 'I told you so'. 

 

Ishant Sharma - He is a good bowler only in your head. He's an average bowler at best, most on this forum or other cricket followers would say the same, but you won't accept. 70 tests for around 200 wickets, less than 3 wickets per match, average almost 37, economy 3.3, SR 66. Pathetic numbers which ever way you look at it. But hey those things don't matter much when the guy got his name on Lords Honours Board.

 

Rayudu - Average batsman. Many not outs, played a lot against weak oppositions, both not his fault but the high average has to to be taken in context. Low SR. Can't even get into our LOI team, which is struggling a bit in the middle order. But you won't accept that. "One of the fastest to 1000 ODI runs" ... again, in your head. There are 40+ batsmen who scored 1000 runs in less number of innings that Rayudu. Even if it's about time, Rayudu took almost 3 years to get to 1000 runs, 50+ batsmen got there in lesser time. 

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/records/283174.html

 

Quote

guess what Rahul is the closest I come to jumping on the bandwagon even though he has not done much yet but I feel it and I see big things..it is still risky as there is a chance I can fall flat for the first time...

It's so apparent to almost *everyone* that Rahul has the potential to become a very good player in all formats. It's possible that he may not end up as a very good player, but there is a high chance he would. And if/when he does become a v good player, you'd add it to your 'accomplishments', gloat about your 'cricket acumen'. As I said before, utterly juvenile.

"even though he has not done much yet" ... In what world are you living? He played astoundingly well in almost every innings across all formats in the last 6 months !! 

"there is a chance I can fall flat for the first time.." ... :laugh: :laugh: Delusional.

Posted
3 hours ago, maniac said:

A batsman who averages 50 in Odis and one of the fastest to 1000 runs-A.Rayudu

Putting this as a separate post, it may have got lost in the long post above. Boy oh boy this deserves its own spotlight.

 

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/records/283174.html

 

At least 40 batsmen have scored 1000 runs in lesser number of innings than Rayudu.

 

At least 50 batsmen have scored 1000 runs in lesser number of days than Rayudu.

 

Posted
4 hours ago, maniac said:

Most exciting non established talent in the world right now.

 

i am not wrong too often with identifying talent and with Rahul I will admit I was marginally wrong.

 

knew the kid had talent always to have a decent career,but thought he was missing that 'it' factor that would propel him to the world beater level but wrong on that front.

 

has it in him to make a big name on the world stage.

 

Yes approved and signed off on him

I still think he doesnt have the "it" or "ex" factor. 

Posted
1 hour ago, philcric said:

Putting this as a separate post, it may have got lost in the long post above. Boy oh boy this deserves its own spotlight.

 

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/records/283174.html

 

At least 40 batsmen have scored 1000 runs in lesser number of innings than Rayudu.

 

At least 50 batsmen have scored 1000 runs in lesser number of days than Rayudu.

 

Another example is of  Vinod kambli, he has 1000 runs and avg above all our gr8s like sachin, gavaskar, dravid, sehwag, laxman....in test. 

True avgs are misleading many times. 

Posted
6 hours ago, philcric said:

Putting this as a separate post, it may have got lost in the long post above. Boy oh boy this deserves its own spotlight.

 

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/records/283174.html

 

At least 40 batsmen have scored 1000 runs in lesser number of innings than Rayudu.

 

At least 50 batsmen have scored 1000 runs in lesser number of days than Rayudu.

 

http://www.thehindu.com/sport/cricket/indias-tour-of-zimbabwe-ambati-rayudu-joint-thirdfastest-to-reach-1000-runs/article8723889.ece

 

BOOM

Posted
5 hours ago, gakgupta said:

I still think he doesnt have the "it" or "ex" factor. 

Why do you think that?

 

100's in all formats....overseas 100's......also becoming a consistent IPL performer....so pretty much doing everything right to showcase his "it" factor

Posted
15 hours ago, maniac said:

Why do you think that?

 

100's in all formats....overseas 100's......also becoming a consistent IPL performer....so pretty much doing everything right to showcase his "it" factor

Well its kind of hard to explain....

I think, too much of kohli's attitude has been rubbed on him and it could be that he is in temporary trans.In other words, he is mimicing. It is not his natural attitude. May not stay for ever.............

If he is doing what he has done for little longer period of time, then we can take it for granted

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...