Trichromatic Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 August 1982 Botham was ranked 3rd in batting and 8th bowling. Probably only time when an all-rounder was in top 10 in both batting and bowling? tweaker 1
Jimmy Cliff Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 11 Jan 1911 Aubrey Faulkner ranked no. 1 batsman (803) and no. 4 bowler (624). 3 March 1914 Aubrey Faulkner ranked no. 3 batsman (689) and no. 1 bowler (578). 12 Feb 1964 Garry Sobers ranked no.1 batsman (894) and no. 4 bowler (676).
Jimmy Cliff Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 12th Feb, 1952 Keith Miller ranked no. 9 batsman (681) and no. 3 bowler (841). Imran (highest batting rank no. 12) and Kapil (highest batting rank no. 21) never achieved this. Malcolm Merlyn 1
Jimmy Cliff Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 30 December 1913 Wilfred Rhodes ranked no. 4 batsman (646) and no. 5 bowler (478). Warwick Armstrong ranked no. 5 batsman (621) and no. 4 bowler (493).
Jimmy Cliff Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 14 July 1884 George Ulyett ranked no. 1 batsman (560) and no. 8 bowler (314). Allan Steel ranked no. 2 batsman (537) and no. 5 bowler (408).
Jimmy Cliff Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 Some other players to achieve this: W.G Grace, Harry Trott, William Bruce, George Giffen, Monty Noble, Frank Woolley and Charles Macartney.
Vilander Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 Cricket Rankings at best are guideline, when we go back to periods when it never existed it becomes dodgy. express bowling 1
putrevus Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 Botham at his best was the best allrounder of the four Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rightarmfast Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 14 hours ago, putrevus said: Botham at his best was the best allrounder of the four Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk No, he wasnt. He was nowhere near Imran Khan. As a matter of fact, he was the worst of all the 4. AuxiliA and express bowling 1 1
putrevus Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 2 minutes ago, Rightarmfast said: No, he wasnt. He was nowhere near Imran Khan. As a matter of fact, he was the worst of all the 4. Imran never was an allrounder, for majority of his career he was tailender who could bat and at end of his career he became prodder who could stone wall and build innings where as Beefy could walk into England team as batsman alone for majority of his career. As an allrounder Imran is no match for Beefy in his prime. Unlike Imran who needed home umpiring to be great bowler, Beefy in prime single handedly could win match on his own even in India by scoring a 100 and then taking 13 wickets on top of it he is an all time great slip fielder. He is the only all rounder to feature in all time top 100 in batting and all time top 100 in bowling. He has infact 9th best ranking in bowling. He just became fat and lazy as he became older but at his peak there is no better all rounder than him in the history of the game.
Sooda Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 Imran took 199 wickets in 50 away tests; Bothams figures are inflated by playing some teams weakened by Packer defections early in his career Rightarmfast 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now