maniac Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 Just now, sandeep said: If you are so sure - If India wins this test from here, are you willing to change your sig till the next test to say " I am a phattu who doesn't have faith in the Indian teams' ability to fight against the odds, and my 'cricketing acumen' is stained just like my phattu chaddi" Why shoot the messenger...as a fan I want India to win and I will celebrate...just laying in the facts and evidence...doesn't look likely...it is what it is. Fact-I want a pay raise and will be happy if I get 1....evidence for all to see-browing ICF at work. Based on evidence-not happening....but want-Hell yeah need a pay raise
sandeep Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 1 minute ago, maniac said: Why shoot the messenger...as a fan I want India to win and I will celebrate...just laying in the facts and evidence...doesn't look likely...it is what it is. Fact-I want a pay raise and will be happy if I get 1....evidence for all to see-browing ICF at work. Based on evidence-not happening....but want-Hell yeah need a pay raise WTF are you on about? How is the current situation that different than Mohali? We ended up winning it didnt we? What "fact" or "evidence" do you have other than your phattu-ness?
maniac Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 2 minutes ago, sandeep said: WTF are you on about? How is the current situation that different than Mohali? We ended up winning it didnt we? What "fact" or "evidence" do you have other than your phattu-ness? No assistance to 125-130+ bowling...England have 3 bowlers who can hit 140+ and an ATG bowler Spin there is some odd bounce and zip which negates good spinners from the average ones. Pitch not to different from what England had at Lords against Pak earlier this year India have a rookie and out of form batting line up bar 2 players. Your passion is inspirational my friend....glassy eyes right now...but Cricket is a passion to all...for the players it is an art....for administrators it is commerce but if you use acumen and analyze it...above all it is a science. Yes that saying is copyrighted...proud to have come up with it
sandeep Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 8 minutes ago, maniac said: No assistance to 125-130+ bowling...England have 3 bowlers who can hit 140+ and an ATG bowler Spin there is some odd bounce and zip which negates good spinners from the average ones. Pitch not to different from what England had at Lords against Pak earlier this year India have a rookie and out of form batting line up bar 2 players. Your passion is inspirational my friend....glassy eyes right now...but Cricket is a passion to all...for the players it is an art....for administrators it is commerce but if you use acumen and analyze it...above all it is a science. Yes that saying is copyrighted...proud to have come up with it When India toured Pakistan in 2004, they had Akhtar who was well above 140, while Irfan and Balaji were well under 140. Who got more wickets and which team won the series? Speedgun numbers mean f@ck-all, cricket is a team sport. And yeah, England have a slight edge that can possibly turn into a big one if they get to 450+ but to sit here and claim that its all done is symptomatic of a phattu. And its easy to make tall claims of science, and then walk it back by saying don't take my posts literally. That is not "acumen" its shamelessness. GoldenSun 1
maniac Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 (edited) 9 minutes ago, sandeep said: When India toured Pakistan in 2004, they had Akhtar who was well above 140, while Irfan and Balaji were well under 140. Who got more wickets and which team won the series? Speedgun numbers mean f@ck-all, cricket is a team sport. And yeah, England have a slight edge that can possibly turn into a big one if they get to 450+ but to sit here and claim that its all done is symptomatic of a phattu. And its easy to make tall claims of science, and then walk it back by saying don't take my posts literally. That is not "acumen" its shamelessness. And what was the 2004 Top order...who were the first 5 batsmen? Leave alone batting....how was the slip catching of that Top 5 to the current team? Quote England have a slight edge so it has started sooner than it usually does. I recognize this pattern.. I say Ben Stokes is a future ATG..initially it is who? then it becomes Ben Stokes is worse than Hardik Pandya....then it is Ben Stokes is ok,nothing great...then it is Ben Stokes is good but you are hyping him and then we all settle down to captain obvious,we all knew Ben Stokes was great all along lol History repeats way too often here. Edited December 9, 2016 by maniac
sandeep Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 Just be ready to update your signature once India wins this test. Rasgulla 1
maniac Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 (edited) 4 minutes ago, sandeep said: Just be ready to update your signature once India wins this test. What the hell you are making it seem like I want India to lose this test...all I am saying is things look bleak.....fast bowling looks toothless,Pitch looks pretty bland...it was Ashwin's skill that got us those wickets....Losing the toss was a nail in the coffin and we let Jenny on the block score a 100 and England still have 4 players capable of making test 100's still to bat. It is a uphill task..if India pull this one,it is a steal but everything points towards an uphill task. What phattu and Bravado....are we the one's playing in the middle. It is totally analyzing the situation......You are brave right...why don't you go ahead and bet $100 real $ on an Indian win against my phattu all the money in my ICF account -ICF ruppees Edited December 9, 2016 by maniac
sandeep Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 So Phattu backtracks from "this game is gone" to "things look bleak". A couple of England wickets fall and all of a sudden, stay tuned for another late breaking acumen diarrhea. Rasgulla 1
Cricketics Posted December 9, 2016 Author Posted December 9, 2016 17 hours ago, Cricketics said: Mine England bowled out for 415 India 125-2 Vijay 65* Ladies and Gentlemen, your winner is:-
kruiser Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 17 hours ago, Viper said: Not even 2 of what ya said is happening.. 17 hours ago, maniac said: Ok this is the way it is going to go down....take this to the bank England will have a lower-order resistance tomorrow.....get up to 457. India will wobble at the top...lose 3 early wickets.....Kohli and Nair to the rescue. Nair will give papa kumble tears of joy by making a maiden 50....Kohli will get to 80 before he will have a rush of blood and throw it away with a rare rash shot...Nair will be gone immediately. India 160/5....Ashwin will be out for a duck...law of averages catching up with him....164/7. Jadeja will play a surprisingly sedate innings.....England will knock Jayant cheaply 170/8......now Jadeja will start whacking...will get a couple of boundaries even a 6...but will be caught midwicket-181/9......Yadav 2 will now start whacking get some slogs in....India 198 Allout England will not enforce follow on. 259 lead....Bhuvi will get cook....Jennings will be out in the 20's....England 35/2. Stokes will come in early and Stokes and Root will turn the heat on with some T20 style hitting....England 253/3 with Stokes out in the 90's England declare-512 ahead. Vijay and Pujara will shut shop and it will look likely that India will pull out a draw...when Ball the bowler will start reversing the ball and him,Jimmy and Stokes will run through us....India 169 Allout The End Salute the great Cricketing Acumen!!! Lagta hai sara constipation yahin nikal gaya... Rasgulla and Cricketics 2
maniac Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 (edited) 5 hours ago, Cricketics said: Ladies and Gentlemen, your winner is:- Wrrrrong......You predicted a total of 415+125=540 runs I predicted 457+88=545 runs Total runs scored=400+146=546 runs I missed by 1 run and you by 7. So I win Edited December 9, 2016 by maniac Jimmy Cliff 1
maniac Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 1 hour ago, kruiser said: Salute the great Cricketing Acumen!!! Lagta hai sara constipation yahin nikal gaya... Look at the total runs scored...add up what I said and how many runs where made
kruiser Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 5 minutes ago, maniac said: Look at the total runs scored...add up what I said and how many runs where made Your only prediction for India was that we will lose 3 wickets. Did you just pull 88 out of your gyan-hole? Cricketics 1
maniac Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 Just now, kruiser said: Your only prediction for India was that we will lose 3 wickets. Did you just pull 88 out of your gyan-hole? Hey look at the context.... I said England will have lower order resistance and make 400-Check India will have a top order wobble-Lost Rahul early-Check Said wicket was bland-check-so far no real demons I saisd Ashwin will pick up 6 wickets-Check Not too bad on just plain acumen eh?
Cricketics Posted December 9, 2016 Author Posted December 9, 2016 1 hour ago, maniac said: Wrrrrong......You predicted a total of 415+125=540 runs I predicted 457+88=545 runs Total runs scored=400+147=546 runs I missed by 1 run and you by 7. So I win That isnlike saying aHillary won the election. -'Sir move on. YOU LOST. I WON I WON. YOU. LOST
fineleg Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 (edited) 13 hours ago, maniac said: Fact-I want a pay raise and will be happy if I get 1....evidence for all to see-browing ICF at work. Can I haz that job? *envious* Edited December 9, 2016 by fineleg
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now