Jump to content

BCCI Must Withdraw From ICC CT or Be Ready To Be Treated As A Slave Dog Of The White Boards


Recommended Posts

Posted

No idea what he even does now, something to do with the ICC by the looks of it. Tbh I'm more concerned about matters closer to home, Graves, Harrison and their cronies ruining the domestic game, than anything in the international circuit

Posted
Brits are applying the old divide and rule policy. They want us to fight each other while they stay in the backseat and enjoy. All these started with Big3. Big3 broke the strong alliance BCCI had with smaller boards. Its high time BCCI realizes their mistake and act cleverly to slowly gain back the trust of the other boards. 
Regarding BCB, do you really think England toured us in the midst of all security threats for no reason? Guess what? Australia is coming too. Why do you think they are giving Papon so much importance and kept him in the ICC committe? Its all part of the plan which started with Big3. They are playing a double game. Now, its upto BCCI how they handle the situation. If BCCI want its power back in ICC it has to gain back the trust of BCB, CSA, WICB etc.
Posted (edited)

@Malcolm Merlyn Is this basically BCCI's Brexit if it were to happen? :biggrin: From a very limited knowledge I see a few similarities. Organisation is unhappy with how things are run and how they are treated in a massive organisation, decides to go it's own way rather than pushing for reform while staying in. The only difference is that the outcome wouldn't be so catastrophic for the BCCI if it left as it will be for the UK

Edited by YCCC
Posted

Oh and I hope the English lads enjoy their one and only season in the IPL. The FTECB will ban them again from next season. Then they'll be forced to play in the new English **** Franchise League. Oh no actually they won't because it will take place at the same time as England international cricket! (That's one of the many examples of how **** it will be)

 

FTECB

Posted (edited)

 

 

17 minutes ago, Stumped said:

The BBL rarely has the Australian test players playing.

I know, but the ECB's marketing spin department has already gone into overdrive over the chance to see "Stokes v Root" when they've already said in the proposals that internationals will be on at the same time. Don't you go sticking up for the ECB and their dastardly plan!

 

BBL is a great league but the ECB are delusional if they think they can copy it here. We simply don't have the weather or the interest in the game for it to work. Cricket fans young and old are already attached to their counties, as shown by the increase year on year on attendances for T20 Blast matches. We also have higher average attendances for first class cricket than most, possibly all countries. The FTECB are forcing a competition on us that the majority of people with an interest in cricket in this country do not want, and I really hope it fails massively.

 

Edited by YCCC
Posted
8 hours ago, YCCC said:

Don't have a clue what all this is about, and don't particularly care, but just came to say FTECB (work out for yourself what the first two letters stand for). They are power crazy in their at attempts to change the domestic game over here and throw away 150 years of tradition. They need to be brought down to earth.

 

Always find the contrast between English and Indian fans amusing in their contrasting views on the national cricket board. You lot back them like you would the players, most of us true fans over here support the players but can't stand the ECB tossers and their despotic regime!

Indian fans do not support BCCI usually, but when its a question of national interest in a cricketing sense obviously people will band together.

Posted
14 hours ago, YCCC said:

Don't have a clue what all this is about, and don't particularly care, but just came to say FTECB (work out for yourself what the first two letters stand for). They are power crazy in their at attempts to change the domestic game over here and throw away 150 years of tradition. They need to be brought down to earth.

 

Always find the contrast between English and Indian fans amusing in their contrasting views on the national cricket board. You lot back them like you would the players, most of us true fans over here support the players but can't stand the ECB tossers and their despotic regime!

Not entirely true - Indian cricket fans have no love for the incompetent babus of the BCCI.  

 

But in this scenario, they are representing Indian Cricket, which has just been at the receiving end of a mafiaesque Game of Thrones Red Wedding type political ambush at the ICC.  Of course people are going to be upset about that.  

Posted

The standards for being an admin here aren't very high :yousuck:

 

Not only was the opening post a tad bit racist but it was also completely idiotic considering financially the extra money went to the associates and government wise new format takes away power from the big three which include England and Australia.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Iconoclast said:

The standards for being an admin here aren't very high :yousuck:

 

Not only was the opening post a tad bit racist but it was also completely idiotic considering financially the extra money went to the associates and government wise new format takes away power from the big three which include England and Australia.

 

 

 

Racist in what sense?

 

BCCI is to look after the welfare of India not anyone else.

Posted
2 hours ago, Iconoclast said:

The standards for being an admin here aren't very high :yousuck:

 

Not only was the opening post a tad bit racist but it was also completely idiotic considering financially the extra money went to the associates and government wise new format takes away power from the big three which include England and Australia.

 

 

so calling someone white is racist.

Posted
11 hours ago, gattaca said:

so calling someone white is racist.

if you accept calling someone black is racist, and if you claim calling someone white isnt then you are racist. but calling some one white is not racist, so it calling someone black.

Posted
1 hour ago, Vilander said:

if you accept calling someone black is racist, and if you claim calling someone white isnt then you are racist. but calling some one white is not racist, so it calling someone black.

Calling the actual derogatory term is racist. But not the actual color. If someone calls me a brown guy I dont feel that is racist.

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, gattaca said:

Calling the actual derogatory term is racist. But not the actual color. If someone calls me a brown guy I dont feel that is racist.

 

agreed.

Posted
1 hour ago, Austin 3:!6 said:

Rumours flying that BCCI decided to pull out of Champions trophy.

 

Can anyone confirm?

 

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Where are these flying?

Posted
7 hours ago, gattaca said:

Calling the actual derogatory term is racist. But not the actual color. If someone calls me a brown guy I dont feel that is racist.

 

Context matters.   And Malcolm's rhetoric here is at a minimum, questionable.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...