Jump to content

Lack of wicket taking bowlers.


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Vilander said:

again thats trundler love, but lets live in LOI for now, tests will come around soon.

Again the foolhardy phaast love, hating on the bowler with a bouquet of test 5-fers, the guy who was your lead bowler in the last England tour.  Won you a test match on the dead track in West Indies, won a test match at kolkata, but still considered a trundler.  

Posted
6 minutes ago, sandeep said:

Ghanta contention.  Bhuvi is comfortably ahead of Yadav as a test match bowler - unless we are playing on a dead track with zero assistance for pacers.  

What? In swinging conditions sure Bhuvi is comfortably ahead. Not so on Aussie/SA pitches and subcontinental flat tracks. So how is Bhuvi comfortably ahead of Umesh in tests??? 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Vilander said:

Forget the thread about wickets and Umesh's historically superior strike-rates over Bhuv, obviously recent LOI's have seen Bhuv bowl better. But its BD next game, Umesh does have an edge on them so he might actually play next game ahead of Ashwin.  

There's no way VK is playing 2 spinners against toygers.  Question is whether Yadav comes back or does Shami.  

Posted
Just now, sandeep said:

Again the foolhardy phaast love, hating on the bowler with a bouquet of test 5-fers, the guy who was your lead bowler in the last England tour.  Won you a test match on the dead track in West Indies, won a test match at kolkata, but still considered a trundler.  

dude its horses for courses, swinging pitch Bhuvi comes in, all others yadav stays. simple.

Posted
Just now, Mosher said:

What? In swinging conditions sure Bhuvi is comfortably ahead. Not so on Aussie/SA pitches and subcontinental flat tracks. So how is Bhuvi comfortably ahead of Umesh in tests??? 

Read my post.  In its entirety.   

Posted
Just now, sandeep said:

There's no way VK is playing 2 spinners against toygers.  Question is whether Yadav comes back or does Shami.  

its Yadav/Bhuv , i would love to see Shami and Yadav. But it will be Yadav, remember the practice game Yadav had 3 early strikes. But shami got Muzzfzfh#$@?wtf?re , Bhuv got Sakib/Mamudhulla.

Posted
Just now, Vilander said:

its Yadav/Bhuv , i would love to see Shami and Yadav. But it will be Yadav, remember the practice game Yadav had 3 early strikes. But shami got Muzzfzfh#$@?wtf?re , Bhuv got Sakib/Mamudhulla.

Bhuvi and Bumrah are undroppable.  They own the last 10 overs.  Against any opposition.  Its Yadav/Shami.  And based on Yadav's 'performance' in the SL game, I'm hoping a fit Shami is playing.

Posted
2 minutes ago, sandeep said:

Bhuvi and Bumrah are undroppable.  They own the last 10 overs.  Against any opposition.  Its Yadav/Shami.  And based on Yadav's 'performance' in the SL game, I'm hoping a fit Shami is playing.

Again Jadeja and Pandya were main culprits against SL.

Shami has not played LOI's in i do not know how many months/years, odds of him being brought back for a ICC semi is pretty low, its going to be Yadav i am hoping its the one with control not the one who bowls fast filth.

Posted
Just now, CG said:

Bhuvi has improved because he worked on increasing his pace ,he bowls 135-145km/h hardly trundler.In modern odi cricket there is no place for medium Pacers.

Not a trundler in LOI's yes, he is fast medium. Tests are different one needs to be on the filed whole day and bowl.

Posted
9 minutes ago, sandeep said:

Bhuvi and Bumrah are undroppable.  They own the last 10 overs.  Against any opposition.  Its Yadav/Shami.  And based on Yadav's 'performance' in the SL game, I'm hoping a fit Shami is playing.

Against B'desh I would keep shwin as B'desh has a lot of left handers in their lineup and Ashwin's off spin will come in handy. Plus Edgbaston supports spin and there have been plenty of matches played so spinners should be a factor compared to a pacer :agree: 

Posted

Bhuvi and Bumrah contain with new ball ,Yadav Shami are aggressive options who can pick wickets ,Yadav has been a force in Icc tournaments be in world cup or champions trophy latest time.I would pick Yadav over Shami too huge a risk if Shami breaks down.


Also Yadav is best fielder of the Pacers and easily among India top outfielders.
Posted
22 minutes ago, CG said:

Bhuvi and Bumrah contain with new ball ,Yadav Shami are aggressive options who can pick wickets ,Yadav has been a force in Icc tournaments be in world cup or champions trophy latest time.I would pick Yadav over Shami too huge a risk if Shami breaks down.


Also Yadav is best fielder of the Pacers and easily among India top outfielders.

Yadav is the best fielder, agreed.  But if Sham is proven fit, and has bowled the equivalent of 10 overs even in net without breaking down, I would be tempted to go with him.

Posted
2 hours ago, sandeep said:

Yadav is the best fielder, agreed.  But if Sham is proven fit, and has bowled the equivalent of 10 overs even in net without breaking down, I would be tempted to go with him.

Shami may not be 100% fit but he will still bowl his spell of 10 overs at a high level. He has never broken down in the middle of the match and bowled through injury in WC 2015 at a high level.

Posted
12 hours ago, sandeep said:

Ghanta contention.  Bhuvi is comfortably ahead of Yadav as a test match bowler - unless we are playing on a dead track with zero assistance for pacers.  

Even Yadav will do well if there is some assistance for pacers. Example first test in WI.

Posted (edited)
On Monday, June 12, 2017 at 8:36 PM, sandeep said:

Ghanta contention.  Bhuvi is comfortably ahead of Yadav as a test match bowler - unless we are playing on a dead track with zero assistance for pacers.  

In the last one year, after both have improved,  Umesh and Bhuvi have played together in only 3 tests. And that is the best way to truly compare as pitch conditions and opposition quality are the same.

 

Umesh bowled much better than Bhuvi in the Dharamshala test vs Australia on a bouncy seaming  track. He also bowled better than Bhuvi against Bangladesh on a flat track. In the Mumbai test vs England, both looked ineffective.

 

In these 3 tests, Umesh has picked up 8 wickets and Bhuvi has picked up 4.

 

So, Umesh still looks better than Bhuvi in test matches unless we are playing in swing friendly conditions like some venues in England.

 

 

Edited by express bowling
Posted
3 minutes ago, express bowling said:

In the last one year, after both have improved,  Umesh and Bhuvi have played together in only 3 tests. And that is the best way to truly compare as pitch conditions and opposition quality are the same.

 

Umesh bowled much better than Bhuvi in the Dharamshala test vs Australia on a bouncy seaming  track. He also bowled better than Bhuvi against Bangladesh on a flat track. In the Mumbai test vs England, both looked ineffective.

 

In these 3 tests, Umesh has picked up 8 wickets and Bhuvi has picked up 4.

 

So, Umesh still looks better than Bhuvi in test matches unless we are playing in swing friendly conditions like some venues in England.

 

 

What about in West Indies?   Did they both play at Kolkata?

Posted
5 minutes ago, express bowling said:

In the last one year, after both have improved,  Umesh and Bhuvi have played together in only 3 tests. And that is the best way to truly compare as pitch conditions and opposition quality are the same.

 

Umesh bowled much better than Bhuvi in the Dharamshala test vs Australia on a bouncy seaming  track. He also bowled better than Bhuvi against Bangladesh on a flat track. In the Mumbai test vs England, both looked ineffective.

 

In these 3 tests, Umesh has picked up 8 wickets and Bhuvi has picked up 4.

 

So, Umesh still looks better than Bhuvi in test matches unless we are playing in swing friendly conditions like some venues in England.

 

 

Umesh has got a continuous run throughout the year now while Bhuvi has been in and out. Yadav supporters made a big deal about this when Yadav was not doing well. Yadav got continous support and has done well. If Bhuvi gets the same he will outshine any bowler in the world. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, sandeep said:

What about in West Indies?   Did they both play at Kolkata?

No....Bhuvi replaced Umesh in Gros Islet and Port of Spain in the West Indies.

 

Umesh did not play the Kolkata test either... it was Shami and Bhuvi there

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...