Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 hours ago, Temujin Khaghan said:

Actually most of them are from low class backgrounds.  many Indian women found it hard to support gavaskar kapil and srinath etc... When dravid Dhoni kohli came in they were like thank God now it's easy to support. If there was one girl in Indian women team who looked like shraddha kapoor at least they would get a lot of popularity.

so do you want to say that women support their team only if there are good looking male players ? I don't think that is the case with majority women but only with few women and shame on them for that.

Also gavaskar and kapil dev were not bad looking. They were decent looking. Much better than some of the players from other countries like rashid latif, miandad, waqar, Lehman, healy,nasser hussian, darren gough, etc.

Posted
Or the women that play cricket are generally not very hot or pretty.

 

Just look at the subcontinent womens team, none will make your heads turn.  I know their job is to play and not look pretty, but it makes me wonder that India does have many extremely hot and pretty women but none of them is a sportswoman? why?

 

Completely agree with you paaji

Posted

^^ What's do good looking about the Australian cricketer apart from skillful photography?  

 

And if they were to have a professional photo shoot with the Indian cricketer, she would look at least as good as the Aussie.

 

White skin/ blonde hair  is not = better looking.

Posted
^^ What's do good looking about the Australian cricketer apart from skillful photography?  

 

And if they were to have a professional photo shoot with the Indian cricketer, she would look at least as good as the Aussie.

 

White skin/ blonde hair  is not = better looking.

 

 

white skin n blonde hair doesnt automatically mean better looking.

 

but in those two particular cases you can give the indian woman best mua in the world she will still look uglier.

 

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted
Only one bottom right is worth a look rest are not, Aussie chicks aren't pretty mostly contrary to perception some British babes are hot though.

 

on avg aussie chicks are hotter than Brits.

 

the sun n good weather radiates them

 

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted
so do you want to say that women support their team only if there are good looking male players ? I don't think that is the case with majority women but only with few women and shame on them for that.

Also gavaskar and kapil dev were not bad looking. They were decent looking. Much better than some of the players from other countries like rashid latif, miandad, waqar, Lehman, healy,nasser hussian, darren gough, etc.

 

 

waqar in his younger days was a handsome lad also had an aura about him.

 

Same with miandad.

 

Kapil was ok looking but gavaskar isnt.

 

lets be honest why u think eugenie bouchard n sharapova have more fans than anyone.

 

its not just down to their skill..

 

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

The problem in India is that the really pretty, fair and good bodied girls belong to the upper middle class and the urban elite families. (Disclaimer- I am NOT hating, i am stating a demographic fact). they have no struggles in life therefore their main focus is on studies, beauty and socialising. They do not have the time or need to go into competitive sport for a living.

 

There most female athletes in india are from low class/caste backgrounds who need sport to make a living and get government jobs. They could be better looking if they took care themselves in terms of appearance and make up but unfortunately they dont make enough money anyway to do that and their focus is purely on training, maybe thats why aesthetically they might not be pleasing to the eye for the rest of the world.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Tendu_10 said:

.....

 

but in those two particular cases you can give the indian woman best mua in the world she will still look uglier.

 

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

 

 

That's a matter of opinion, I disagree.  But  your opinion is as good as mine.

 

What's not opinion is that I can also make a comparison and generalize it.  Fior eg

 

Indian cricketer

 

 

07c4b142ab43546a9b5fe56ce373cd9e.jpg

 

 

Aussie cricketer:

 

429590983B05477BA2B3972722CB713D.ashx

 

 

Posted
That's a matter of opinion, I disagree.  But  your opinion is as good as mine.

 

What's not opinion is that I can also make a comparison and generalize it.  Fior eg

 

Indian cricketer

 

 

07c4b142ab43546a9b5fe56ce373cd9e.jpg

 

 

Aussie cricketer:

 

429590983B05477BA2B3972722CB713D.ashx

 

 

 

i still find aussie more attractive.

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Tendu_10 said:

 

 

its true bhai southies n lower caste generally are not nice looking n dont also put effort into makeup beauty like northie girls do.

apart from few brahmin girls in south.

 

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

 

 

im half southie too so watch your tone if i was you

Posted
im half southie too so watch your tone if i was you

 

sorry if i offend u bro. just my personal opinion.

 

i dont hate southies or anything.

 

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Tendu_10 said:

 

 

waqar in his younger days was a handsome lad also had an aura about him.

 

Same with miandad.

 

Kapil was ok looking but gavaskar isnt.

 

lets be honest why u think eugenie bouchard n sharapova have more fans than anyone.

 

its not just down to their skill..

 

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

 

 

You are wrong here. Waqar and minadad were not even close to handsome. You must be joking. Gavaskar was decent looking. His only drawback was his height. Even tendulkar is decent looking but he has the same drawback.

I thought that it is generally only men who watch female matches for their looks. Women generally do not do it. Also in most sports the percentage of males is much more than females.

Posted
1 hour ago, LordPrabhzy said:

The problem in India is that the really pretty, fair and good bodied girls belong to the upper middle class and the urban elite families. (Disclaimer- I am NOT hating, i am stating a demographic fact). they have no struggles in life therefore their main focus is on studies, beauty and socialising. They do not have the time or need to go into competitive sport for a living.

 

There most female athletes in india are from low class/caste backgrounds who need sport to make a living and get government jobs. They could be better looking if they took care themselves in terms of appearance and make up but unfortunately they dont make enough money anyway to do that and their focus is purely on training, maybe thats why aesthetically they might not be pleasing to the eye for the rest of the world.

that also applies to men in sports other than cricket.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, NameGoesHere said:

That's a matter of opinion, I disagree.  But  your opinion is as good as mine.

 

What's not opinion is that I can also make a comparison and generalize it.  Fior eg

 

Indian cricketer

 

 

07c4b142ab43546a9b5fe56ce373cd9e.jpg

 

 

Aussie cricketer:

 

429590983B05477BA2B3972722CB713D.ashx

 

 

We are talking about overall numbers. They have much much more hot and beautiful ones than us and some of those hot ones are real bombshells.

Also white skin, blonde hair and green/blue eyes suit women and not men. So they look attractive. It looks gayish on men.

Edited by chaman jhinga
Posted

Our Indian girls go nuts everytime they see Mitchell starc, Glenn Maxwell etc... It's a fact. You can't force them to support rahane and bumrah over those two. Patriotism would mean nothing when it comes down to lust the same way you guys are madly in love with elles Perry than jhulan goswami... Many Indian women used to openly support imran khan over gavaskar and kapil... 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...