Jump to content

Time for Jimmy to hang up his boots


gakgupta

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, sensible-indian said:

Average was 35 before he got 4 lower order wickets. Might as well go back to that by the end of the series...who knows.

 

I am an Anderson fan myself but this stat is as deceiving as his average of 14 in last UAE tour.

 

Barring the 5fer in Adelaide, Anderson has been impactless this Ashes.

He got the wickets of Smith and Marsh??

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Artie said:

He got the wickets of Smith and Marsh??

Yes...after they had done all the damage. Then lower order wickets. I should have phrased it better.

 

At the end, his average for this match is 25.


What's his impact for the match? Zip. Nil. Nada. Zero.

 

Anderson being a very economical bowler will have stats that show him up as much better than what he really is. All he has been doing this Ashes is being economical.

Edited by sensible-indian
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Gollum said:

Haters should note that no Indian pacer is capable of getting such numbers in Australia. So much disrespect to this ATG. 

anderson is a very fine bowler but he is not an ATG. has done little of note in several countries. let's not bandy that ATG tag too much. his record is quite akin to several classical eng pacers like fraser, mulally and caddick who exploited seam/swing conditions effectively. I will say that cloudy is much better than them, and has been an excellent player for eng.

 

for me, andie's biggest stumbling block is not his Asia record but how he did in Aus, NZ and SA where he averages 36, 36 and 40 respectively. this shows that he didn't do well in a lot of countries where pacers are expected to do well. it is quite akin to zaheer who avgd 28 in eng, 35 in oz, 28 in NZ and 36 in SA. I would not call either him or zak an ATG.

Edited by Vijy
Posted
13 hours ago, Trichromatic said:

12 wickets at an avg of 25.83 in this Ashes so far. 

 

few wickets when it was pretty much english condition..

and few lucky wickets yesterday 

Posted
8 hours ago, velu said:

 

few wickets when it was pretty much english condition..

and few lucky wickets yesterday 

It's just good on papers, but that's how his bowling has been. Earlier he wasnt good even on papers.

Posted
21 hours ago, velu said:

 

few wickets when it was pretty much english condition..

and few lucky wickets yesterday 

this 4-fer had a couple of meaningless wickets.

Posted

Its too much to ask him to run through sides on aussie roads...but he has done well for a 35 yr old. Atleast better than woakes & broad.

He respect and admire his amazing skills with the ball, he is magical at times.

Last time only Mcgrath bowled better for a 35 yr old & 120 odd tests veteran.

Posted
54 minutes ago, SUMO said:

Its too much to ask him to run through sides on aussie roads...but he has done well for a 35 yr old. Atleast better than woakes & broad.

He respect and admire his amazing skills with the ball, he is magical at times.

Last time only Mcgrath bowled better for a 35 yr old & 120 odd tests veteran.

walsh was another. akram (even without bottlecaps) was solid >35 too.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Vijy said:

walsh was another. akram (even without bottlecaps) was solid >35 too.

Yeah but those two were before glenn.

Posted
1 minute ago, SUMO said:

Yeah but those two were before glenn.

yes, cricket has changed a lot in these 10 yrs. hard to imagine test pace bowlers operating at an optimal level when they are past 35 now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...