Jump to content

So we didn’t lose in any format on an overseas tour without the next “Kapil Dev”


maniac

Recommended Posts

Pandya since that Australian tour 

 

16, 30, 8, 10, 8, 3*, 14, 9, 0, 21, 21

 

Can we stop hyping this guy like he is like an indispensable choice as a batsman. Yes his bowling will be handy. But his batting is nothing to write home about.  For exactly one year he did something. Then he regressed.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Khota said:

Gill is being rushed. I would always pick an experienced player withi similar stats over Gill. Oh I like Gill too but there is a time for everything.

their is nothing permanent with age n all

shaw made his debut who is same age as gill.Sachin n many debut at early age

Which exp player

Rahane :hysterical:

Rayudu- who i clealry said will struggle the minute he ll step in aus but u didnt beileve 

Raina :hysterical:

Vihari- not the kind of batsman we need in LOI

 

Who is left

Link to comment
47 minutes ago, putrevus said:


Proper batsman doesn’t have 105 as highest score and 5 FC hundreds at age of 27 and 2 list A hundreds.

Proper batsman do have a Fc avg around 50 and he does

What the prob with high score he bats low so its diff to score 100s

 

ur telling me that this guy is not a proper batsman ......just look at him

 

Quote

Pandya doesn’t command anything, he is just a bits and pieces player who has shown no improvement.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ohh he does he commands a place as hitter or jadeja was not a problem as 5th bowler . Every team needs a hitter like pandya at 7 and goes for it 

Edited by Ankit_sharma03
Link to comment

Pandya is in a league of his own, which is players with the ability to hit 100s, score at a high SR and bowl at 140+ :dance:

 

Ind gets a steady supply of good batsmen and spinners from time to time. It is rare to find players such as Pandya, along with quick bowlers like Bumrah 

 

Edited by zen
Link to comment
5 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

What's the use of bowling at 140+? Aaron bowls at 150, should he replace Shami?

Pandya is being selected for the AR’s role .... And Shami bowls quick too :dance: .... If Aaron is in form, I would pick him over trundlers, who I try not to support 

Edited by zen
Link to comment
51 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

their is nothing permanent with age n all

shaw made his debut who is same age as gill.Sachin n many debut at early age

Which exp player

Rahane :hysterical:

Rayudu- who i clealry said will struggle the minute he ll step in aus but u didnt beileve 

Raina :hysterical:

Vihari- not the kind of batsman we need in LOI

 

Who is left

I will clearly pick any of the above 4 before Gill for this world cup. Gill is too young to be playing the WC. It makes no sense to rush him. Sachin was an exception but noone should be rushed the way he was.

Link to comment
33 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

What's the use of bowling at 140+? Aaron bowls at 150, should he replace Shami?

Just because you can hurl something down the pitch at 140 kmph does not make someone a bowler. There is quiet a bit more to it. His supporters show their blind ignorance when they quote his speed. Since Aaron bowls at 150 he should be ahead of everyone. Lee was a better bowler than McGrath and aaron is better than Steyn. Makes perfect sense.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Khota said:

I will clearly pick any of the above 4 before Gill for this world cup. Gill is too young to be playing the WC. It makes no sense to rush him. Sachin was an exception but noone should be rushed the way he was.

why wud u pick rahane, raina, rayudu whose  failure rate is high to a guy who is unknown he might do well or not, but those guys cant do well for sure now 

 

Link to comment
Let me repeat for the umpteenth time. This is a age of specialist with players who excel is specific skillset. There is no such thing as allrounders as it is just not possible to develope those. India has done fine without Pandya. He has a bright future if he focusses on bowling.

He has to improve his bowling especially since he will be bowling as third seamer.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
4 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

Pandya since that Australian tour 

 

16, 30, 8, 10, 8, 3*, 14, 9, 0, 21, 21

 

Can we stop hyping this guy like he is like an indispensable choice as a batsman. Yes his bowling will be handy. But his batting is nothing to write home about.  For exactly one year he did something. Then he regressed.

Pandya is overhyped bits and pieces player who has shown no improvement even after playing for couple of years. People were comparing this guy with Kapil Dev. Kapil in his first 12 months went from being night watchmen to no6 batsmen and 100 wickets in his first 25 tests. Kapil could walk into team as a bowler alone, his batting was plus.

 

Kapil Dev had ability like noone else, he had uncanny knack of rising to occassion when his other batsmen failed.He is reason why Second tied test happened, he could score 129 with single hand against rampaging Donald when none of top could pass double digit score.

 

People talk about his stats with bat but he was bit like Viv Richards who never cared about stats but was more interested in getting the job done.He is 100 times better with batsman than that overrated Imran Khan.

 

Has Pandya shown that improvement, answer is no. They are better off without these players but guys like these are so enticing to any team management that even worthless guys like Binny get to become test cricketers.Mitchell Marsh is another guy .

 

Angelo Mathews started that way but he improved his batting and has become main stay.Pandya has shown no evolvement.

Edited by putrevus
Link to comment
1 hour ago, putrevus said:

 

Kapil Dev had ability like noone else, he had uncanny knack of rising to occassion when his other batsmen failed.He is reason why Second tied test happened, he could score 129 with single hand against rampaging Donald when none of top could pass double digit score.

 

People talk about his stats with bat but he was bit like Viv Richards who never cared about stats but was more interested in getting the job done.He is 100 times better with batsman than that overrated Imran Khan.

Pandya vs Kapil is nothing but joke. I am hoping Pandya to do at best Moein Ali in terms of Odi performance. He is still far far behind Ali bhai

He should be nowhere near test team unless it England or English like conditions 

Edited by mishra
Link to comment
6 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

Pandya since that Australian tour 

 

16, 30, 8, 10, 8, 3*, 14, 9, 0, 21, 21

 

Can we stop hyping this guy like he is like an indispensable choice as a batsman. Yes his bowling will be handy. But his batting is nothing to write home about.  For exactly one year he did something. Then he regressed.

No, in era of 2 new balls, its bits and piece like players are needed at 6, 7, 8. Ones who have pottential to score a fifty but have decent SR.

Pandya is one of such players. I do not have access to Indian domestic league but if there are similar, we should choose any based on performance and quality.

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, mishra said:

No, in era of 2 new balls, its bits and piece like players are needed at 6, 7, 8. Ones who have pottential to score a fifty but have decent SR.

Pandya is one of such players. I do not have access to Indian domestic league but if there are similar, we should choose any based on performance and quality.

has to be a lot more consistent and reliable. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...