Jump to content

What happened to Shreyas Iyer?


Gollum

Recommended Posts

I think Iyer looks the part so far in ODI. We need to back him for number 4 in both T20 and ODI

Batting and fielding averages
  Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 4s 6s Ct St
ODIs 9 7 0 346 88 49.42 327 105.81 0 4 30 9 3 0
T20Is 10 9 2 150 30 21.42 128 117.18 0 0 14 4 2 0

 

His SR is low for T20 so far, but he can get comfortable with enough backing I think. 

 

Link to comment

I hope Daredevils still keep shreyas as the  captain. He is 24 and is getting exposed to captaincy and is learning fast. If everything goes well he will be In the peak of his prime in 6 years as batsmen peak around then. Kohli,Rohit and Rahane,Pujara (in tests) will be the wrong side of 30s which means Shreyas can take over as the captain in all 3 formats.

 

He also needs to be in the scheme of things in tests as well

Edited by maniac
Link to comment
On 11/8/2019 at 12:26 PM, Gollum said:

Perfectly suited for shorter formats, dunno about tests but no reason the kid can't develop into a white ball great. Love the tempo he maintains right from the start of an innings, similar to Raina in that regard and boy does he murder spin !!!! Great body language as well, blunder to not have invested time in him before the WC. Future captaincy material I reckon. 

Someone should be held accountable for giving chances to the likes of DK and Rayudu ahead of iyer last year. 

Link to comment
On 11/8/2019 at 4:42 PM, rtmohanlal said:

yes .... claiming DK to be the  solution to  that spot which is the highlight of the lot

He even said rahane is right for no.4 when he made runs in SA and never played him again in ODI. We had players but kohli messed up our no.4 issue with his lack of patience. Any other good captain wud have identified 3-4 players and wud have given then 20-25 games to find the answer. He gave 2-3 gamea at most to any youngster n moved on

Link to comment
6 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

He even said rahane is right for no.4 when he made runs in SA and never played him again in ODI. We had players but kohli messed up our no.4 issue with his lack of patience. Any other good captain wud have identified 3-4 players and wud have given then 20-25 games to find the answer. He gave 2-3 gamea at most to any youngster n moved on

well said .... Rahane is a good example w.r.t  what all you said & a bit more, i mean a good example of  poor  team management .  Rahane is now  31y 157d old. He made his debut in ODIs at 23 y & 3m , perfect time for debuting. But after 43 inns he averaged a mere 28.88 with str: 77.33 which is far off from adequate  for a slot in the team. But instead of dropping him then and there itself  they persisted with him. Result.... Rahane thru experience improved a lot to avg: 41.95 @ 79.59  in next  44 inns. And then they dropped him. So basically when he needed to be dropped they persisted with him and when he needed to be persisted  they dropped him.

 

All in all  87 inns wasted on a batsman  who could avg: only 35.26 @78.63  when there were so many   highly talented youngsters

waiting for their chances.Just soo strange are the ways of this TM.

Edited by rtmohanlal
Link to comment
8 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

He even said rahane is right for no.4 when he made runs in SA and never played him again in ODI. We had players but kohli messed up our no.4 issue with his lack of patience. Any other good captain wud have identified 3-4 players and wud have given then 20-25 games to find the answer. He gave 2-3 gamea at most to any youngster n moved on

      That's where  the Coach's role becomes important. Right now players are given chances as per captain's whims it seems . The very idea that Virat

      does not have no idea who are the potential best fits for middle Order is such a sorry state of affairs . Cannot make out how a world class batsman

      cannot figure out that when looks at potential players .

      A good coach would have finalized with captain what he is looking for players say for # 4 & 5 and if that moron has not enough idea , can drill the          that point to him . Then take those requirements to selectors with their list of 3-4 players for 4 & 5 positions to selectors .

        That would have solved all this problem in those 4 years by persisting with those 3-4 players .   

       

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...