Gautam Gambhir: "It is disgusting to see that Rayudu is being judged more on his IPL form and less on his overall skill sets."

[vvvslaxman]

How many people he supplies biriyani to?

[Ankit_sharma03]

4 hours ago, jusarrived said:

Please don’t even try to put hacks like Sharma and Dhawan in the same league of tendulkar and Dravid . 

Sharma n dhawan are better ODi cricket then dravid 

 

Lets say even if they are not in their leagues, so if those guys go through phases where run dries up then why not these guys 

4 hours ago, jusarrived said:

Dhawan is inconsistent and Sharma is a proven FTB .

Dhawan is most consistent in world tournameny and thats next

sharma FTB- england will have pattas and thats next 

4 hours ago, jusarrived said:

If Rayudus technique is suspect , it’s the same for Dhawan and Sharma who have been found wanting against swing , bounce or spin on multiple ocassions .

Rohit is one of the best players of pace n bounce

Dhawan is miles ahead- he has runs in eng, aus, sa

 

Rayudu is incapable of playing against pace n bounce, aussies found him out in india. Eng bowlers who were kind of trundles made him dance in 2015 series in aus 

4 hours ago, jusarrived said:

Yes both are better than Rayudu , but not by a big margin and considering we have been struggling to find a good middle order bat and in comparison there are a half a dozen batsmen who can open currently , I would say Rayudus case is stronger than these two one dimensional hacks who can only open .

Better .....miles ahead miles 

 

4 hours ago, jusarrived said:

KL and DK are just potential, there is nothing to show they are good fit for ODI no4 .

how many chances have KL got at 4 remind me

4 hours ago, jusarrived said:

Sahankar , I don’t buy the hype . He’s extremely lucky to have played for India . I haven’t seen much of his bowling , but he’s not more than a 30 avg bat and looks inferior to Rayudu as a pure batsmen 

same shankar loooked better then kohli against aus in that innings where he got run out unfortunately 

[Ankit_sharma03]

2 hours ago, zen said:

Rayudu has nothing to complain with numbers like below: 

 

View overall figures [change view]

Primary team India

Start of match date between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Dec 2019

Batting position between 1 and 6

Qualifications innings batted greater than or equal to 5

Ordered by batting strike rate (descending)

Page 1 of 1

Showing 1 - 6 of 6

First Previous

Next  Last

Return to query menu Cleared query menu

 

Overall figures

Player	Mat	Inns	NO	Runs	HS	Ave	BF	SR	100	50	0	4s	6s
V Kohli	11	11	0	611	123	55.54	648	94.29	3	1	0	57	5
KM Jadhav	10	8	3	256	81*	51.20	281	91.10	0	2	0	27	3
S Dhawan	13	13	1	420	143	35.00	475	88.42	1	2	2	52	4
RG Sharma	13	13	0	556	133	42.76	701	79.31	1	4	1	44	16
MS Dhoni	8	7	4	327	87*	109.00	417	78.41	0	4	0	22	6
AT Rayudu	10	10	2	247	90	30.87	328	75.30	0	1	2	24	6

@jusarrived- as u can see rayudu cant even compete with these guys when they are out of form, forget when they are in form. Rayudu best is worse then their bad form

[zen]

14 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

@jusarrived- as u can see rayudu cant even compete with these guys when they are out of form, forget when they are in form. Rayudu best is worse then their bad form

Competes with Rohit, who may not be out of form but past his best, though whose SR is pretty bad for an opener .... if we swap their positions, who knows Rayudu could have slightly better numbers .... In short, both needed to pull their socks up to be in the squad and not be a liability for team Ind 

Edited April 21, 2019 by zen

[Ankit_sharma03]

3 minutes ago, zen said:

Competes with Rohit, who may not be out of form but past his best, though whose SR is pretty bad for an opener .... if we swap their positions, who knows Rayudu could have slightly better numbers .... In short, both needed to pull their socks up to be in the squad and not be a liability for team Ind 

no one is past his prime in rohit's age , neither he looks out of form .....sometimes runs just dont come 

Rayudu against Aus n Sa pacers 

 

u knw the basic diff between both- rohit has extra time to play pace , rayudu is always beaten for pace

[zen]

Just now, Ankit_sharma03 said:

no one is past his prime in rohit's age , neither he looks out of form .....sometimes runs just dont come 

Rayudu against Aus n Sa pacers 

 

u knw the basic diff between both- rohit has extra time to play pace , rayudu is always beaten for pace

At the moment, Rohit, Rayudu and Shankar, they are all bad 

[Lannister]

WTH! Everyone want him out of the team as he didn't earn his place based on the merit. Stop talking sh!t Gambhir. 

[Ankit_sharma03]

1 hour ago, zen said:

At the moment, Rohit, Rayudu and Shankar, they are all bad 

u cnt pick on moment as its today, u never knw who will work tomm and obv u will trust guys who have quality more then someone who doesnt

[kubrickian]

2 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Sharma n dhawan are better ODi cricket then dravid 

 

Lets say even if they are not in their leagues, so if those guys go through phases where run dries up then why not these guys 

Dhawan is most consistent in world tournameny and thats next

sharma FTB- england will have pattas and thats next 

Rohit is one of the best players of pace n bounce

Dhawan is miles ahead- he has runs in eng, aus, sa

 

Rayudu is incapable of playing against pace n bounce, aussies found him out in india. Eng bowlers who were kind of trundles made him dance in 2015 series in aus 

Better .....miles ahead miles 

 

how many chances have KL got at 4 remind me

same shankar loooked better then kohli against aus in that innings where he got run out unfortunately 

He scored runs in England and NZ. He was out of form against Aus in India, not because he cant play pace. In any case, its much more easier to play pace in India than in Eng and NZ where he has scored runs.

 

KL and Vijay have never proved they are good enough to be in the side. So if its a competition between these guys, I would rather select someone who has actually scored runs over a period of time than someone who has "potential" which only exists in their supporter's imagination.

Edited April 21, 2019 by kubrickian

[Ankit_sharma03]

17 minutes ago, kubrickian said:

He scored runs in England and NZ. He was out of form against Aus in India, not because he cant play pace. In any case, its much more easier to play pace in India than in Eng and NZ where he has scored runs.

please go n watch him struggle in India only against pace

 

against a eng side that was dismissed in 6 mnths

against nz when conditions were easy n in his 90 they were playing a bowler short

 

these things wnt happen in wc

17 minutes ago, kubrickian said:

KL and Vijay have never proved they are good enough to be in the side. So if its a competition between these guys, I would rather select someone who has actually scored runs over a period of time than someone who has "potential" which only exists in their supporter's imagination.

how much have they played???

[vvvslaxman]

We have Rayudu Fans 

 

[Ankit_sharma03]

Do these Ex-cricketer even watch cricket

 

this guy is a terrible fielder

and now look at his running today- there was 2 and he had no intent

 

Does gambhir understand how important running n fielding is in LOI, till date he says rayudu non selection was a blunder