Dil Dil India Posted July 11, 2019 Posted July 11, 2019 2 hours ago, Shaz1 said: Nice wet dream your having there sir. Do yourself a favor and dry up. Cause reality will hit you like a truck. You guys know all about trucks and hitting with trucks......lol
Ranvir Posted July 11, 2019 Posted July 11, 2019 The 1999 South Africa side was the best to never win the World Cup.
CG Posted July 11, 2019 Posted July 11, 2019 Yes this is the strongest side to not win a world cup.India had 4 bowlers avg around 25 in era where 30 is norm,Batting lineup if including shikar one of best.Pandya ,Jadeja as all-rounders. Mariyam 1
Real McCoy Posted July 11, 2019 Posted July 11, 2019 Nope. Not even close. We had talent in this team but they were either too raw or over cooked. Mix it with less talented players and those who choke in the big stage, then you have India 2019 squad. So you have a mishmash of a team that is bound to fail at some point. I suppose WI in 1983 WC was the strongest to not win a WC followed by 1999 SA
Mariyam Posted July 12, 2019 Author Posted July 12, 2019 (edited) On 7/11/2019 at 10:51 PM, Real McCoy said: Nope. Not even close. We had talent in this team but they were either too raw or over cooked. Mix it with less talented players and those who choke in the big stage, then you have India 2019 squad. So you have a mishmash of a team that is bound to fail at some point. I suppose WI in 1983 WC was the strongest to not win a WC followed by 1999 SA We topped the group. We won the Pak, Bangladesh and SL games at a canter. WI and South Africa we brushed aside. We smacked Australia for 360 odd. We dominated the group stages completely. Except for the Afghanistan game which was close, for the others the result was never in doubt, including the game we lost to England. Yes, our top order had a paralytic stroke in the semifinals, but that doesn't change the fact that we totally dominated the group stages. Edited July 12, 2019 by Mariyam
Sujithmb13 Posted July 13, 2019 Posted July 13, 2019 No way,Windies 83, Pakistan and South Africa 1999,NZ 1992 , India 2003 are better than this team Jimmy Cliff 1
Pollack Posted July 13, 2019 Posted July 13, 2019 10 hours ago, Mariyam said: We topped the group. We won the Pak, Bangladesh and SL games at a canter. WI and South Africa we brushed aside. We smacked Australia for 360 odd. We dominated the group stages completely. Except for the Afghanistan game which was close, for the others the result was never in doubt, including the game we lost to England. Yes, our top order had a paralytic stroke in the semifinals, but that doesn't change the fact that we totally dominated the group stages. Pak, SL, Bangladesh, Afghanistan are mediocre sides. Winning against them at this moment is a bare minimum. South Africa strangely played very bad. The only good team we defeated is Australia.
Vijy Posted July 13, 2019 Posted July 13, 2019 With our completely absent middle order, this was one of the weaker Ind teams to make the SF. Bowling was top throughout, but the batting... less said about it, the better. And our batters also proved that they are mental midgets (and possibly FTBs) against Bolt and co.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now