Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am personally a fan of Javed Akhtar Sahib.

He is an intellectual and must be an inspiration for the Muslims to leave Islam. 

 

3 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

Fatwa pel diya jaayega Is taquiyya par

 

2 hours ago, diga said:

Still dont think he is an atheist.. he is an islamist 

 

Please don't mind, but your standard of being an "Atheist" seems to be ONLY to criticise Islam. While any one who criticises Hinduism too, then you doubt his atheism. 

 

While my standard is totally opposite. For me, if any atheist is only criticising Islam, but don't criticise other religions, then that person is neither a true atheist, nor a true human being. And an example is Tarek Fateh. He is deadly against Islam and Pakistan, but still I am unable to consider him a true atheist, or true secularist or even true human being. 

 

 

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Alam_dar said:

I am personally a fan of Javed Akhtar Sahib.

He is an intellectual and must be an inspiration for the Muslims to leave Islam. 

 


 

intellect who thinks Moghuls period was the golden period for India where everybody prospered and Alauddin Khilji saved India by blocking invasion of Mongols of India that we should all be grateful to him.

 

Quote

 

Please don't mind, but your standard of being an "Atheist" seems to be ONLY to criticise Islam. While any one who criticises Hinduism too, then you doubt his atheism. 


 

let Muslim atheists (if there is such species) worry about reforming Islam which still stuck in 700 AD while all other religions have reformed and have changed course based on modern times. They are afraid to raise voice against Islam, while focusing all their valor against soft targets of other religions. Other religions will take care of themselves while Islam is stuck in 700 CE with killing exMuslims and Atheists and throwing gays from tall buildings.one I s free to believe and switch among all other religions while Islam has only one way entry.

Quote

While my standard is totally opposite. For me, if any atheist is only criticising Islam, but don't criticise other religions, then that person is neither a true atheist, nor a true human being. And an example is Tarek Fateh. He is deadly against Islam and Pakistan, but still I am unable to consider him a true atheist, or true secularist or even true human being. 

 

 

Islam is the only religion in need of reform, others are doing fine.

Edited by coffee_rules
Posted
16 hours ago, diga said:

Still dont think he is an atheist.. he is an islamist 

He is an artist. he works for whoever pays him.

 

By calling him an atheist or islamist, you're giving him too much credit.

Posted

It's noise pollution from all loudspeakers that should be haram, it's already illegal but compliance & enforcement are so amazing in India. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Manny_Pacquiao said:

Remember when sonu nigam said the same thing, and was widely condemned? LOL

The issue with Sonu Nigham and Javed Akhtar is different is different from my point of view.

 

Sonu Nigham was intended to target only the Muslims and Islam and Azan. This is not looked as a favourable action in the eyes of the secular community. Actually, this one sided targeting is resisted with strong opposition while it goes directly against the true secular values. 

 

The issue of Javed Akhtar is different. He is not only against Azan, but he opposes and criticises all the religions for such noisy activities as he made it clear in his tweet. There should be no bells in the Churches and also the Mandirs then and everybody should be limited to their places of worship and should not be allowed to disturb the others. 

 

In Muslim community itself, there was strong reaction against Sonu Nigham, but the message by Javed Akhtar is taken seriously by the moderate Muslims at least, while the blind Mullah/Sharia followers are off course going to kill Javed Akhtar too. 

 

If I am not mistaken, then it was found that Sonu Nigham house is situated in a place where comes no voice of Azaan. This thing also made case of Sonu Nigham weaker. 

Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

The issue with Sonu Nigham and Javed Akhtar is different is different from my point of view.

 

Sonu Nigham was intended to target only the Muslims and Islam and Azan. This is not looked as a favourable action in the eyes of the secular community. Actually, this one sided targeting is resisted with strong opposition while it goes directly against the true secular values. 

 

The issue of Javed Akhtar is different. He is not only against Azan, but he opposes and criticises all the religions for such noisy activities as he made it clear in his tweet. There should be no bells in the Churches and also the Mandirs then and everybody should be limited to their places of worship and should not be allowed to disturb the others. 

 

In Muslim community itself, there was strong reaction against Sonu Nigham, but the message by Javed Akhtar is taken seriously by the moderate Muslims at least, while the blind Mullah/Sharia followers are off course going to kill Javed Akhtar too. 

 

If I am not mistaken, then it was found that Sonu Nigham house is situated in a place where comes no voice of Azaan. This thing also made case of Sonu Nigham weaker. 

Mandir ghanti is not put on loudspeakers, bhajans and kirtans are during festival times, as compared to 5 times each day, 365.24 days every year. yeah right, all are same. 

Edited by coffee_rules
Posted
21 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

The issue with Sonu Nigham and Javed Akhtar is different is different from my point of view.

 

Sonu Nigham was intended to target only the Muslims and Islam and Azan. This is not looked as a favourable action in the eyes of the secular community. Actually, this one sided targeting is resisted with strong opposition while it goes directly against the true secular values. 

 

The issue of Javed Akhtar is different. He is not only against Azan, but he opposes and criticises all the religions for such noisy activities as he made it clear in his tweet. There should be no bells in the Churches and also the Mandirs then and everybody should be limited to their places of worship and should not be allowed to disturb the others. 

 

In Muslim community itself, there was strong reaction against Sonu Nigham, but the message by Javed Akhtar is taken seriously by the moderate Muslims at least, while the blind Mullah/Sharia followers are off course going to kill Javed Akhtar too. 

 

If I am not mistaken, then it was found that Sonu Nigham house is situated in a place where comes no voice of Azaan. This thing also made case of Sonu Nigham weaker. 

 

Which is why secularism is hypocritical. You're creating a false equivalence between azaan and bells in mandirs.

 

I don't mind bells in mandirs. I absolutely hate the islamic call to prayer. Firstly, because I don't agree with the message - "there is only one god but allah" - and the loud blaring of the loudspeaker annoys the f*** out of me. And it has no place in a predominantly hindu nation.

 

Javed akhtar has no authority on any of these issues, he should stick to entertainment.

Posted
32 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

The issue with Sonu Nigham and Javed Akhtar is different is different from my point of view.

 

Sonu Nigham was intended to target only the Muslims and Islam and Azan. This is not looked as a favourable action in the eyes of the secular community. Actually, this one sided targeting is resisted with strong opposition while it goes directly against the true secular values. 

Wrong, he mentioned all. Since I can't embed tweets

Shatak Aaj Tak: Sonu Nigam Goes On A Twitter Rant About Azaan And ...

 

https://silverscreen.in/movies/news/sonu-nigam-on-the-azaan-row-i-mentioned-temple-and-gurudwara-too/

 

https://www.hindustantimes.com/music/sonu-nigam-tweets-more-clarification-mentioned-temples-gurudwaras-too/story-o2aWLK29RVvamFqCKNXYeN.html

32 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

If I am not mistaken, then it was found that Sonu Nigham house is situated in a place where comes no voice of Azaan. This thing also made case of Sonu Nigham weaker. 

You are mistaken, there were 2 mosques near his house blazing azan, captured on video. Islamists incl BBC Urdu ones spread fake news there, which was busted immediately. He has 2-3 houses, so they went to his vacant house and reported. 

 

Now proceed. 

Posted (edited)

Azan is bigotry in itself. Why do Muslims do it in Hindu areas? Why do they proclaim that only their path is correct? In Germany they are looking to ban it arguing that it is hate speech, as if the migrants will let them lol.  

 

ALLAH is Most Great. ALLAH is Most Great.

ALLAH is Most Great. ALLAH is Most Great.

I testify that there is no god except ALLAH.

I testify that there is no god except ALLAH.

I testify that Muhammad is the Messenger of ALLAH.

I testify that Muhammad is the Messenger of ALLAH.

 

As a dharmic I hate this message. And I don't really respect the Prophet. How can people find equivalence of temple bells with this nuisance 5x365? Why do Muslims torture us before sunrise every *ing day despite court order? Can't they do that part at least without loudspeaker? Rest of the day anyway we are dealing with other noises and it gets drowned out. Sorry this BS is an act of aggression and exhibition of Muslim street power. 

Edited by Gollum
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Gollum said:

Azan is bigotry in itself. Why do Muslims do it in Hindu areas? Why do they proclaim that only their path is correct? In Germany they are looking to ban it arguing that it is hate speech, as if the migrants will let them lol.  

 

ALLAH is Most Great. ALLAH is Most Great.

ALLAH is Most Great. ALLAH is Most Great.

I testify that there is no god except ALLAH.

I testify that there is no god except ALLAH.

I testify that Muhammad is the Messenger of ALLAH.

I testify that Muhammad is the Messenger of ALLAH.

 

As a dharmic I hate this message. And I have zero respect for the Prophet. How can people find equivalence of temple bells with this nuisance 5x365? Why do Muslims torture us before sunrise every *ing day despite court order? Can't they do that part at least without loudspeaker? Sorry this BS is an act of aggression and exhibition of Muslim street power. 

 

 

The azaan isn't simply offensive to 'dharmics', it should be offensive to secularists as well. "There is only one god but allah", is a very UN-SECULAR MESSAGE.

 

Would a true secularist defend un-secular behaviour? i don't think so.

Edited by Manny_Pacquiao
Posted
2 hours ago, Gollum said:

Wrong, he mentioned all. Since I can't embed tweets

Shatak Aaj Tak: Sonu Nigam Goes On A Twitter Rant About Azaan And ...

 

https://silverscreen.in/movies/news/sonu-nigam-on-the-azaan-row-i-mentioned-temple-and-gurudwara-too/

 

https://www.hindustantimes.com/music/sonu-nigam-tweets-more-clarification-mentioned-temples-gurudwaras-too/story-o2aWLK29RVvamFqCKNXYeN.html

You are mistaken, there were 2 mosques near his house blazing azan, captured on video. Islamists incl BBC Urdu ones spread fake news there, which was busted immediately. He has 2-3 houses, so they went to his vacant house and reported. 

 

Now proceed. 

Thanks. 

I don't see any problem in Sonu's tweets.

In my opinion, he is correct in criticising Azaan here. 

Also thanks for clearing the issue about his house. 

 

PS:

Do you agree with Sonu when he says he is against use of any electricity in any temple and gurdwara too for getting loud enough for other people outside the temples and gurdwaras?

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Manny_Pacquiao said:

 

Which is why secularism is hypocritical. You're creating a false equivalence between azaan and bells in mandirs.

 

I don't mind bells in mandirs. I absolutely hate the islamic call to prayer. Firstly, because I don't agree with the message - "there is only one god but allah" - and the loud blaring of the loudspeaker annoys the f*** out of me. And it has no place in a predominantly hindu nation.

 

Javed akhtar has no authority on any of these issues, he should stick to entertainment.

I don't agree with you that Secularism is hypocritical, but the issue is this that you are following the Muslim path where they make special rules for Muslims in name of Muslim majority and Islamic Republic. You are doing the same in name of Hindu Majority and the Hindu Rashtra. 

 

Same thing Gandhi did about the slaughter of the cow, which was again a hypocritical thing and against the Secular values. 

×
×
  • Create New...