Jump to content

After West Bengal , It is Bengaluru riots over a FB post


coffee_rules

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, speedheat said:

CommieIslamist biased fact checking. What if it was a two year old post? Becomes derogatory. As per Naveen’s own admission reported in local newspapers, he says he was defending Hindus honor by responding to abuses online. They don’t report these in English newspapers.

 

EfhSo09UMAADJuR?format=jpg&name=900x900

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

CommieIslamist biased fact checking. What if it was a two year old post? Becomes derogatory. As per Naveen’s own admission reported in local newspapers, he says he was defending Hindus honor by responding to abuses online. They don’t report these in English newspapers.

 

EfhSo09UMAADJuR?format=jpg&name=900x900

He is defending himself in above statement. I don't think he is truthful.

Please read his fathers statement, he was provoking people since August 5th.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, speedheat said:

Not justifying their actions but  how would you feel if somebody makes  derogatory post on Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj or Maharana Pratap?

How many riots do you hear due to derogatory posts on Ram , Sita, Durga done  on a daily basis? Even on the case of 2 years ago from Bashir that altLeft has fact checked, did anybody go on the streets to protest or destroy public property?

Edited by coffee_rules
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jokes apart, she didn’t claim the kids to have the same biological father. It is plausible .

 

But look at how the victim card is played and our media highlighting the economic realities of rioters who were paid by either SDPI or Congress itself.

Edited by coffee_rules
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...