Jump to content

Did you ever think that a pacer will manage to take 600 test wickets?


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, maniac said:

Why should he retire? He is playing because he still has a place in the side. 
 

The point is that If he had retired with 500 wkts for e.g. instead of 600 his status would not change among key bowlers .... It is not as if because he picked up 600 wkts, the world change for him .... And he can play as long as he likes 

 

Quote

 

The wickets are byproduct of his longevity, you seem to be stuck on that part.

 

How about his longevity is a result of his performances.

 

 

Good players are relatively more consistent (which is why they are good) and therefore gain the benefits of longevity in one way or another.  For e.g. Sobers played for 20 years. FC for 22 years. Hadlee played till 39-40. 

 

 

Quote

As far as Anderson goes yes he is not in the top tier for all the caveats but still he on my book is definitely the top 10 fast bowler of all time based on his records. Broad I will put him in the top 15.

 

Nope

Edited by zen
Posted
18 minutes ago, zen said:

The point is that If he had retired with 500 wkts for e.g. instead of 600 his status would not change among key bowlers .... It is not as if because he picked up 600 wkts, the world change for him .... And he can play as long as he likes 

 

 

Good players are relatively more consistent (which is why they are good) and therefore gain the benefits of longevity in one way or another.  For e.g. Sobers played for 20 years. FC for 22 years. Hadlee played till 39-40. 

 

 

 

Nope

Ok Please list the fast bowlers you rate over Anderson and then we will dig deeper into it :winky:

Posted

McGrath

Ambrose

Wasim

Marshall

Hadlee

Walsh

Steyn

Waqar??? Imran??? Botham??? Kapil??? (Debatable)

 

I am going through other names right now and don’t know if anyone can be outright ahead of Anderson. 

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, maniac said:

McGrath

Ambrose

Wasim

Marshall

Hadlee

Walsh

Steyn

Waqar??? Imran??? Botham??? Kapil??? (Debatable)

 

I am going through other names right now and don’t know if anyone can be outright ahead of Anderson. 

:lol:  ..... May be the below would help (a chart I made some time back from selected post 1970 bowlers. Likes of Barnes, who are not on this recent bowlers list, can be added as well):

 

1210867316_TestBowlersAvgSR_081920.thumb.png.79a558de6b6c30df2840fda2022e51bf.png

Edited by zen
Posted
On 8/26/2020 at 3:52 PM, maniac said:

McGrath

Ambrose

Wasim

Marshall

Hadlee

Walsh

Steyn

Waqar??? Imran??? Botham??? Kapil??? (Debatable)

 

I am going through other names right now and don’t know if anyone can be outright ahead of Anderson. 

all of them.

 

Posted

If Kapil an all rounder bowling mostly in Indian conditions, at a time when all nations had biased home umpires can take 434 wickets, then I don't think it is impossible why a specialist bowler will fail to take 600. Not many specialist bowlers will cross that mark but rare ones who have one more many factors working for them like great fitness, bowling skills, sustainable career can definitely make it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...