Jump to content

Cricket does not need fielders


zen

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

BTW if anyone remeber the genius that has created original thread have defended parthiv patel keeping saying it wasnt his mistake on Sa tour and also thigh slapper dropped catches in 1st test in SA

 

So @zen ur sarcasm is someone reality 

Edited by Ankit_sharma03
Posted
25 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

BTW if anyone remeber the genius that has created original thread have defended parthiv patel keeping saying it wasnt his mistake on Sa tour and also thigh slapper dropped catches in 1st test in SA

 

So @zen ur sarcasm is someone reality 

 

Rich coming from supporter of Murali and Shankar.

Posted
30 minutes ago, zen said:

In the season of dumb threads: Cricket does not need fielders :nod:

 

Think about it in this way -> What is the purpose of fielders? To take catches, create run outs and stop runs. I challenge you to find one game where the opposition has not scored runs. If teams are scoring runs w/ fielders dropping catches and missing/not creating runout, they have failed. This fact highlights that with or without fielders teams continue to score runs, rendering fielders useless. Therefore, it is safe to say that cricket does not need fielders (only ball fetchers).  

 

giphy.gif

 

Logic is not your strong suite.

 

Your troll attempt: Grade 3/10.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Khota said:

 

Logic is not your strong suite.

 

Your troll attempt: Grade 3/10.

 

This is a serious thread. Show me one game where the other team has not scored runs :orderorder: 

Posted
7 minutes ago, zen said:

 

This is a serious thread. Show me one game where the other team has not scored runs :orderorder: 

 

Troll attempt 2/10. Final grade Fail.

 

Now go sit down.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

 

fir wo Rohit the chanaya ki manohar kahaaniyan kyun likhta hai 


Chanakya also read vedas and other books and became smart enough to write his own thesis. Rohit has made the best use of coaches and analysts due to his own intellect to use them.

 

Computer se kaam le ne ke liye data bhi samajhna zaroori hai

Posted
3 minutes ago, maniac said:


Chanakya also read vedas and other books and became smart enough to write his own thesis. Rohit has made the best use of coaches and analysts due to his own intellect to use them.

 

Computer se kaam le ne ke liye data bhi samajhna zaroori hai

 

.

 

Wo data ko mand budhi balak jaisa follow karna bhi har baar zaruri nahin hota 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

 

 

That catch is pointless as Finch scored 35 :no: .... Fielders failed to do their job as Aus scored runs 

Posted (edited)

ICC, please take note:

 

  • No sportsman can do two or more things 
  • A cricketer has only 8 hours per day so needs to focus on one thing
  • Data shows that despite fielders, teams score runs (in fact no team in the history of cricket has been on zero)
  • Therefore, to improve cricket and allow players to either do batting or bowling, cricket does not need fielders (most useless role in cricket) 
  • That is ICF's strong stand :hitler:

 

Edited by zen

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...